- Home
- MN/Region
- World/Nation
- Politics
- Health/Science
- Business
- Arts
- Posts
- Sports
- Community Voices
- MN Jobs

Our major sponsors
Sponsor of
Second Opinion
Sponsor of
Community Voices
Sponsor of
Community Sketchbook
Our major advertisers

MinnPost thanks these generous donors:
MAJOR FOUNDATIONS
John S. and James L.
Knight Foundation
Blandin Foundation
McKnight Foundation
Minneapolis Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
INDIVIDUALS & FAMILY FOUNDATIONS
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Sam & Stacey Heins
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown
Foundation
CORPORATE LEADERSHIP CIRCLE
General Mills Foundation
Medtronic Foundation
(See all donors here.)
By David Brauer | Published Thu, Oct 30 2008 11:58 am
This morning, as expected, Sen. Norm Coleman's campaign filed an unfair campaign practices complaint against Al Franken's campaign for "falsely and knowingly" accusing Coleman if being "fourth-most corrupt senator in Washington" (or, in another ad, "in America.")
I'm going to repeat somthing I mentioned in Daily Glean this morning: While the organization that judged Coleman thusly — Citizens for Responsible Ethics in Washington — may be a "liberal front group" as the Coleman campaign alleges, the "fourth-most" ranking is accurate.
There was some dissembling on this point at this morning's press conference (video below). Coleman spokesman Mark Drake noted — accurately — that CREW doesn't list Coleman among its Top 20.
The Top 20 contains three senators: Democrat Mary Landrieu and Republicans Mitch McConnell and Ted Stevens.
However, there are four "dishonorable mentions," and Coleman is the only senator listed. Thus, it is accurate to call Coleman the "fourth most corrupt."
But is it misleading? Here, the Coleman folks are on firmer ground, though not necessarily firm enough for an upholdable campaign-practices complaint.
Remember, CREW has filed an ethics complaint about Coleman's D.C. rent deal, but there's been no ruling. It may be baseless, or not.
Coleman spokesman Mark Drake contests CREW's claims to bipartisanship, noting board members' Franken contributions and staff appearances on the Democrat's Air America radio show.
As final proof of CREW's one-sidedness, Drake contends any Democrats on CREW list are there as "window dressing." But what percentage constitutes curtains and drapes?
The Top 20 list features six Democrats, including House powers Charlie Rangel, John Murtha and William Jefferson. That's 30 percent. If you throw in the dishonorable mentions, Democrats account for 29 percent.
Too low? Perhaps. But consider an objective comparison: Sourcewatch lists 23 current or recently former congressfolk under investigation by congressional ethics committees or law enforcement.
Five of the 23 are Democrats. That's 22 percent. CREW actually lists a higher percentage of suspect Dems than the courts and committees do.
Video of the press conference, courtesy of The Uptake, below:
Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.
1 Comment: Hide/Show Comment
Forgot Password? | Register to Comment
MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.
We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.