- Home
- MN/Region
- World/Nation
- Politics
- Health/Science
- Business
- Arts
- Posts
- Sports
- Community Voices
- MN Jobs

MinnPost thanks these generous donors of $25,000 or more:
MAJOR FOUNDATIONS
John S. and James L.
Knight Foundation
Blandin Foundation
McKnight Foundation
Minneapolis Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
INDIVIDUALS & FAMILY FOUNDATIONS
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Sam & Stacey Heins
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown
Foundation
(See all donors here.)
By David Brauer | Published Tue, Dec 2 2008 9:13 am
Although absentee and missing ballots may yet vault Al Franken into the U.S. Senate, it's no secret he needs to have higher-quality challenges to close his current 344-vote deficit with Norm Coleman.
Instead, Coleman's challenges are better, a new MPR analysis indicates.
The station looked at 1,000 contested ballots released by the Secretary of State — about a sixth of the current total — and determined 350 were "clearly" Coleman votes versus 330 for Franken.
If Franken was right and Coleman's challenges more frivolous, Coleman's number would be lower. (Another 100 votes went to neither man, and 206 were unclear. Franken might hope to gain in the latter pile, but that's highly unlikely.)
Bottom line: if this substantial sample holds true, Coleman's lead would likely increase after the State Canvassing Board meets. And that would greatly lengthen Franken's already-long odds of winning via absentees and missing ballots.
Update: Via Twitter, Jeff Rosenberg offers a fair caveat — we don't know how representative the 1,000-ballot sample is. The pile may contain more Franken challenges, which would inflate Coleman's "clear" numbers, even though the Republican has challenged more ballots.
My only comeback is that one-sixth is a large sample size, so the SoS pile is more likely to be representative.
Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.
3 Comments: Hide/Show Comments
Forgot Password? | Register to Comment
MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.
We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.