After 25 years, St. Paul second-graders and Muammar Gaddafi still linked by letters
Like many Americans, Jill Swanson is watching Muammar Gaddafi’s regime massacre people with disgust. But she has something other Americans don’t: a letter from the Libyan dictator.
“I was the teacher who wrote to Moammar El-Gadhafi,” Swanson says.

The name is spelled differently from MinnPost’s style rules because that’s how it was typed at the end of Gaddafi’s 1986 reply, which was otherwise in Arabic.
The letter caused a journalistic stir for two reasons. Reporters were fascinated that a bunch of St. Paul second-graders had chosen to engage a hated terrorist who actually wrote back. Copy editors were relieved the kids had gotten the Libyan leader to transliterate his name for the first time.
If a contemporary recounting from Cecil Adams’ “The Straight Dope” is to be believed, “This was the first known indication of his own feelings on the subject, and the wire services and many newspapers promptly announced they would switch.”
If they did, it didn’t stick: a Google News search reveals no media outlet spells it that way — unless they include the spelling in stories about the “112 different ways to spell Gaddafi.”
So that part of the tale proved ephemeral. But Swanson — then, as now, a second-grade teacher at Maxfield Magnet School — calls it “just the hugest learning experience for my students, and me as well.”
In the next breath, she adds, “It backfired on us.”
The story begins with a 1986 bombing of a German disco, killing two American soldiers and a Turkish woman. The U.S. said it intercepted messages from Libya to its German agents; 10 days later, President Ronald Reagan ordered the country bombed.
American planes hit Gaddafi’s home base in Tripoli and Benghazi, the “second city” that has broken free in the current crisis. Gaddafi obviously survived, but his 15-month-old daughter was killed.
“The day after the U.S. bombed Libya, we discussed it, and one of the students said we should write a letter to President Reagan and Gaddafi,” Swanson recalls. “We were following current events and writing letters. I really believe in writing letters.”
She says, “One of the most meaningful letters began, ‘Dear President Reagan, I want to know if we’re the good guys or the bad guys. Why didn’t we talk?'”
Students also put Gaddafi on the spot, according to this 1986 Associated Press story:
Jimmy Xiong had written: "Dear Col. Kadafi, I am so sorry that your little daughter died and can I ask you a favor? Could you stop bombing us, OK? And we'll stop bombing you."
"Dear Col. Kadafi, Why are you bombing the U.S.A.? Can't you think of a better way to solve the problem? Well I can . . . Write letters!" wrote Daniel Barbosa.
Reagan didn’t reply, even though Swanson enlisted Minnesota U.S. Senator Dave Durenberger to get the letters to the White House. (To be fair, Swanson says the class had written to the President earlier that year, and received a response.)
Gaddafi’s reply arrived on “white paper trimmed in green and decorated with Libyan political slogans,” the AP story noted. Swanson had to get it translated; it began:
"Dear friend. We received your kind letter in which you condemned the American barbarian aggression against our country and our people. We appreciate your deeply feelings towards us."
The letter referred to Reagan and Thatcher as “child murderers,” urged they be “toppled and tried” and memorialized the Libyan dead as "martyrs for the cause of Allah.”
Says Swanson, “The children understood Gaddafi’s letter was propaganda. He said 33 bombs hit his tent. The kids didn’t understand how 33 bombs could hit a tent and anyone survive. We had a great discussion about the difference between fact, opinion and propaganda, and how presidents might not always be what we want them to be.”
At least one newspaper editorial cautiously praised the class, but not everyone appreciated the even-handed intellectual inquiry. Beyond questioning an American president, the mere act of writing to a dictator – a terrorist linked to the death of American GIs – brought “a lot of negative mail” once national media picked up on the story, Swanson says.
“It was a front-page story in the newspaper, Newsweek and Time featured it, and we got good and bad feedback from people all over the world,” she notes.
While the harshest condemnations stung at first, “The kids were cool about it,” Swanson says. “One reporter asked a student if he knew where Libya was, and the student replied, ‘Yes, the same place it is now.’
“I think they learned a lot. They suggested something, we acted on it, and it got results.”
Now in their thirties, those students sometimes invite Swanson to weddings and graduations, “and when I stop in, I’ll sometimes hear, ‘Remember when we did this? It was a major thing for me and my family.’”
As for Gaddafi, Swanson says simply, “He’s the same tyrant he was 25 years ago, who has turned on his own people. It’s interesting, and frightening, and I believe my former students are keenly aware of it because of what happened then.”
Recent Stories
Most Commented
-
30 comments
-
27 comments
-
27 comments
-
24 comments
-
22 comments
Comments (6)
I was a military spouse at the time of the bombing, living with my husband and two children at an army caserne. I remember that day very clearly, because Qaddafi threatened to attack our European military schools and daycares in retaliation. It was a frightening time.
Readers might expect that I would react angrily to your class project, but I do not. You and your remarkable class asked the right questions of both leaders, and you conducted an incredible experiment in critical thinking, something that is sadly lacking in our educational system, and in our society.
Thank you for your courage and your dedication to your profession. Well done.
Ms. Olson,
I am not sure why you say "sadly lacking". Teaching students to think critically and objectively, questioning power respectfully and peacefully, is a description of my work that i and many, many of my colleagues would be honored with, were it offered. The tone of discussion regarding American education has changed so much during my 28 year career it's difficult to recognize. The appreciation and admiration i still receive from my students and their families seems lost now in a flurry of condemnation of my profession that i honestly do not understand.
I will take your comments as sincere criticism but watching the events unfold in Wisconsin i take umbrage at a kind of mindless cacophony that surrounds it in the political discourse.
Prophets and other critical thinkers are not popular folks. Their challenges to our belief systems threaten our very identities. Yet without encouraging and protecting them, a society cannot improve.
I believe that teachers who engage students in critical thinking are heros and should be treated as such. They must overcome major obstacles to do so. These hurdles are placed by "fact"-based curricula and testing and by threatened parents and administrators.
Moreover, most people don't realize that tenure was established to protect teachers from being fired for thinking critically. In fact, many teachers don't realize the responsibility tenure places on them to do exactly that.
Unfortunately, the students I try to prepare to be teachers are products of their own schooling. Most are not good critical thinkers themselves, so learning to teach critical thinking to their own students is beyond them. And even if they "get it," their extensive observation the schools convinces them that efforts in this direction will be unrewarded and perhaps punished.
@Terry: I agree with Michele, to some degree, but place the blame on the reliance now of having to meet standardized testing benchmarks. Kudos to any teacher today who is able to engage their class in critical thinking exercises. Sadly, the trend has been to turn our schools into factories for producing competent, but not educated, workers. I don't think it's an problem entirely new; seem to recall hearing about colleges requiring freshmen to take English their first semester because so few could write at a college level. That was 30 years ago.
Terry, I never meant criticism toward the teaching profession itself, please believe me. I hold our teachers in great esteem. And if teachers were actually in control of our educational system, I would feel so much more hopeful for our future.
I agree with Steve Sundberg about the standardized testing, and I've heard so many teachers complain about it. It's all about appearance, and how the school looks, and the state looks. And, let's not offend a parent, because the administration might end up on the nightly news.
Can you even IMAGINE a classroom writing to Bin Laden? Could you imagine the fallout? But, boy, I'd sure love to read what he had to say.
Critical thinking and creativity are things that should be encouraged and taught in schools, as advocated by Berenice Bleedorn, who died a week ago at age 99. But they are hard to "measure" and so not valued by an education system that relies heavily on standardized test to measure student learning.