Bill Kling revises history about public-media-expansion plan
I suppose you’ve made it in this town when Bill Kling throws a sharp elbow your way; Andy Mannix’s recent City Pages cover on the departing Minnesota Public Radio founder catalogues the not-so-exclusive club. But there’s a bigger story here than a shot thrown in our direction.
In September, on the heels of his retirement announcement, Kling floated a five-year, $25-million-per-station plan to add scores of journalists to public broadcasting newsrooms. The plan — which would be $100 million for four stations — is big, bold, and fits with Kling’s narrative of newspaper decline and public media filling the gap.
In a Q-and-A, Mannix asked Kling why the plan wasn’t yet funded:
CP: And if I'm remembering correctly, you wanted to have $5 million per city raised before you left?
BK: Oh, not before I left.
CP: Ok, I think that was in a MinnPost column.
BK: Consider the source. …
I’m 18 percent sure Kling is kidding, but the original source of the information is Ken Doctor, a former Pioneer Press managing editor who is now a finger-on-the-pulse industry analyst. Whatever you think of me or MinnPost, Kling thought enough of Doctor to include him in a “Future of News” summit a couple of years ago.
Here’s what Doctor wrote in October, after talking to Kling:
Kling and his colleagues are strategizing their plans and foundation asks — and his hope is that funding can be locked down by next June [2011], when he formally steps from his APMG post. He says his post-retirement plan is to focus on the building out of public media. If it is, hiring could commence by mid-2011.
Obviously, it’s mid-2011, and Kling concedes the funding — much less the hiring — isn’t there yet. I emailed Doctor to see if he stood by his column; he said he was “comfortable” with it, adding:
“In a subsequent talk, he noted, as he did to City Pages, that fundraising has gone slower than he wanted and timeline is delayed. What's going on, I think, is that Kling purposely set out a big goal, one that could make a difference in local reporting and one that could get noticed. The deep recession, uneasy recovery and NPR becoming a political piñata nationally have all slowed down big-money fundraising."
I can’t blame Kling for swinging for the fences to grab funders’ attention. As both Doctor and I noted, his pre-departure goal was a hope. But, perhaps out of pride, Kling is not telling the truth about his initial statements.
Ultimately, though, there’s no real deadline here — if Kling can raise the money in a couple of months or years, public media and the public will be much better off, and no one will remember the early 2011 struggles. Given his track record, it’s unwise to bet against him, even amid public broadcasting's political problems.
But if Kling, of all people, can’t raise the money, perhaps public media won’t replace many of those lost local-paper journalists. For better or worse, the local news future may depend on the competitors Kling has spent a career dismissing: newspapers slogging through digital conversion, a profusion of MinnPost-scale outlets, and reportorial bloggers.
Recent Stories
Most Commented
-
30 comments
-
27 comments
-
27 comments
-
26 comments
-
23 comments
Comments (12)
I have never had a convincing rationale explained to me, as to Minnesota taxpayers, and for that matter MPR members should finance MPR's empire building. His particular vision simply supplies no value to the typical listener.
@Hiram Foster
The reason you don't find any convincing rationale for MPR or their funding sources is because you mistakenly believe that the "free market" will fund everything that's necessary.
Unfortunately, you have failed to learn the lessons of history, which show that belief has no basis in reality. If it were up to you and your GOP brethren, there would be no safety net for the poor, hungry, or the indigent; you'd let them die, but then you'd complain about the cost to bury them.
Compassion is definitely not part of your character or DNA.
Party wise you are barking up quite the wrong tree. I have no problem with public support for what the market does not provide, classical music programming. But the market provides news and popular music programming very nicely thank you. And the management and cost structure of MPR is way out of line for a nonprofit. We shouldn't be paying such high salaries to so many, we shouldn't be subsidizing a downtown headquarters of a kind no private station can afford. And we shouldn't have allowed the diversion of valuable assets into private hands.
Financially, Kling has always pushed his operation to the edge and then depended on the public to bail him out. We must stop being Bill Kling's enablers.
"there would be no safety net for the poor, hungry, or the indigent; you'd let them die, but then you'd complain about the cost to bury them."
I am all for those things. But Bill Kling can afford to buy his own parachute.
Hiram: " the market provides news and popular music programming very nicely thank you"
I know everyone is entitled to his opinion, but you are so, so wrong.
Mr. Kling seems to have developed delusions of grandeur in his long reign at MPR. The first thing MPR needs to do is wean itself from government funding, a task which shouldn't be that hard to do given the small part we've been told it plays in MPR's total budget. (If you're a listener and don't contribute, turn off your radio/streaming audio/podcast until you do.)
Other things MPR should consider include limiting the tenure of those who come after Kling and keeping a tight lid on individual dreams of empire building.
I know everyone is entitled to his opinion, but you are so, so wrong.
Check out 'CCO, all the talk shows and of course the myriad of tv news channels. And the radio dial is full of rock stations.
Well, there's radio news and there's radio news.
I roam the dial with obsessive frequency, and yes, there's "CCO, all the talk shows ... and the radio dial is full of rock stations."
But, at the moment, no commercial station in the area plays jazz or classical music (or much acoustic), and none besides 'CCO provides much continuous news.
I'll leave aside "the myriad of tv news channels," since "news" on these channels seems a malleable concept.
"there would be no safety net for the poor, hungry, or the indigent; you'd let them die, but then you'd complain about the cost to bury them."
I am all for those things." - Hiram Foster
Hiram, tell me you don't mean what that sounds like.
That said, I must say my numerous radios were once set to MPR 24-7. Dale and Jim Ed were my heroes. I was a proud dues paying member. That ended when MPR started accepting commercials (my love affair with Gary Keillor ended about then as well, when he started pitching other things than Powdermilk Biscuits), and I found out that Kling was being paid similar to a third world despot. I now agree with those who believe that if MPR wants to be a commercial enterprise, it should live in the same world as the WCCOs and KSTPs (although I can't stomach either one).
Kling has made his bed, and now needs to lie in it.
And for public non profit station that actually delivers stuff not found elsewhere, and that is focused on serving the community, check out KFAI.
I am for safety nets for people who need them and who can't pay for them. Bill Kling, someone who has been made wealthy by his association with a nonprofit entity that seeks contributions from the public, can afford his own.
let's not forget Jazz 88!
The Current and most APM progams might as well be commercial (agreeing with Hiram here).
I've been through both NPR's headquarters in DC and MPR/APM headquarters here in St. Paul, and MPR feels like a WAY fancier place to work.
However, if commercial programming, flashy headquarters, and a big salary for Kling have document-able return on investment (like more corporate funding from corporate sponsors who pay big bucks to use MPR's flashy auditorium, more revenue from events like rock the garden, etc), which is documentably funneled into MPR's primary mission: high-quality coverage of regional journalism, then I fully support partial public funding.
MPR: please convince me :)