Skip to Content

Fallout from Honduras's presidential crisis — in Washington

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The military ouster of Honduras's president in June has led to deep ideological fissures, paralysis in a legislative committee, and efforts to undermine national foreign policy.

And no, that's not a sampling of what's happening in the Honduran capital of Tegucigalpa, but rather in Washington, where a deep and cranky divide has formed between Democrats and Republicans over what most Democrats call a "coup" in America's backyard.

Honduras thus becomes another entry on a long list of Latin American countries that have served as Olive Oyls to Washington's left-right tug of wars.

"There's a time-honored history of members of Congress turning to Latin America to play out their ideological differences with each other and with the White House," says Daniel Erikson, senior associate for US policy at the Center for Inter-American Dialogue in Washington. "It's an easy place to play politics from the perspective of Congress because it's not seen as an area of vital national security interest, as Afghanistan or the Middle East or Asia would be."

The Organization of American States plans to take another stab Wednesday at resolving the three-month-old stalemate between ousted President Manuel Zelaya - now holed up in the Brazilian Embassy in Tegucigalpa - and interim president Roberto Micheletti. An OAS delegation will travel to the Honduran capital and a "call to dialogue" is anticipated, though a snap resolution of the political conflict appears unlikely.

In Washington, fallout from the Honduran crisis is piling up. Presidential diplomatic appointments are being held hostage; one Democratic senator tried to block a Republican colleague from visiting Honduras; and the State Department - suspected in parts of Latin America of actually supporting the military action against Mr. Zelaya - faces renewed questions about the US stance on Central America's most serious political crisis in at least a decade.

Washington's Honduras divide is captured in the heated battle between the Democratic chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, John Kerry of Massachusetts, and a Republican committee member, Jim DeMint of South Carolina. Senator DeMint enraged Senator Kerry by placing a hold on two nominations before the committee: that of Arturo Valenzuela to become assistant secretary of State for Western Hemisphere affairs, and that of Thomas Shannon to be ambassador to Brazil.

DeMint, like a number of conservative Republicans, says Zelaya was legitimately removed from office as he plotted a takeover in the image of Venezuela's leftist President Hugo Chávez. He faults both nominees for, "like the Obama administration, defending the unconstitutional strong-arm tactics of Zelaya."

For his part, a furious Kerry tried to foil DeMint's plans for a fact-finding trip Friday to Tegucigalpa. In the end, the Pentagon provided DeMint and his delegation with a plane.

"This is the kind of latent ideological divide that flares up in Congress when you get a crisis like this one in Honduras with elements that fit the beliefs and concerns of each side," says Mr. Erikson. The involvement of Venezuela's Mr. Chávez, who defends Zelaya against a "rightist coup" he insists was aided by the US military, "really reverberates with the US Congress," Erikson adds.

DeMint claims that, as a result of his trip, Mr. Micheletti on Monday announced his intention to lift a controversial emergency decree, made shortly after Zelaya's surreptitious return to Honduras, that limits civil liberties such as press freedoms and freedom of assembly.

But Obama administration backers say DeMint's actions undermine US foreign policy. Micheletti is playing the US congressional divide for all it's worth, these policy analysts say, adding that he may feel little incentive to compromise if he senses he has support in Washington. After some hesitation, the State Department sided with Zelaya and imposed some measures against the Micheletti government, including a revocation of some Honduran officials' visas and millions of dollars in reduced aid. The US is also threatening not to recognize the winner of presidential elections set for late November.

But the administration was also irked by Zelaya's risky, undercover return to Tegucigalpa and has refrained from imposing anything as harsh as trade sanctions.

Meanwhile, says Erikson, the sound and the fury in Congress go "well beyond Honduras to the whole question of how the US should deal with the left-leaning countries in Latin America."

Related Tags:

Comments (2)

For decades, US foreign policy in Latin America has been to help corporate interests from here and the internal wealthy elites in countries rich in natural resources to reap great wealth from their power to control those resources and the countries' labor, usually without worrying about environmental damage.

In recent years, presidents Chavez, Lula, Correa and a few others have sought to establish economies that are fair to all their citizens, that address illiteracy and lack of health care, and empower ordinary people -- at the expense of the monied elites. For their efforts, some have been excoriated as "dictators" seeking to remain in office for life, among them Zelaya.

Zelaya's "crime" was to call for a poll asking the people if they wanted to reduce the power now held by the "10 Families" that constitute the elite by changing the constitution the U.S. (John Negroponte?) "helped" Honduras to write.

In Honduras, the 10 Families and the Honduran military (trained in tough tactics at the U.S. School of the Americas in N. Carolina) carried out what was an illegal military coup, no matter what others may choose to call it.

The U.S. should join Latin America's other democracies in demanding that Micheletti step down immediately in favor of Honduras' democratically elected president.

I've followed the news from Honduras for over 15 years, primarily on-line, through English language Latin American publications. From where I sit, the current contretemps has little if anything to do with the people of Honduras and everything to do about who gets to hold the reins while business proceeds as usual. Honduras is a country at war with itself, where gangs murder one another and government officials with impunity and police/military personnel murder gang members and those suspected of gang membership with equal immunity. It is a country with no natural resources of note, little in the way of an economy, and even less in the way of health or education for its citizens. It is a nation in which a 16 year-old girl, one of the first in her family to complete her education, takes joy in having a job selling American shoes for 12 hours a day, 6 days a week. Frankly, it doesn't matter who wins this battle. The people will continue to lose.