Skip to Content

Goldman Sachs under fire: Is Wall Street cheering or cowering?

Goldman Sachs Chairman and CEO Lloyd Blankfein testifies before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Investigations Subcommittee on Tuesday.
REUTERS/Jason Reed
Goldman Sachs Chairman and CEO Lloyd Blankfein testifies before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Investigations Subcommittee on Tuesday.

NEW YORK — Is Wall Street enjoying the roasting of Goldman Sachs by Congress? Or, do financiers see the grilling of Goldman Sachs executives as a politically motivated witch hunt, which could just as easily shift to another firm?

A little bit of both could have been happening Tuesday, as Goldman Sachs officials, including CEO Lloyd Blankfein, appeared before a Senate subcommittee and tried to explain their involvement in the subprime mortgage crisis.

Internal Goldman documents, released by the Senate, show that the firm appeared to be profiting from the collapsing housing market - even bragging about it at times. That wouldn’t be surprising.

On Wall Street, Goldman Sachs is admired to a certain extent for its ability to generate profits. The Wall Street firm is known for its trading expertise and superior market intelligence. The firm is so dominant in some areas that many sophisticated investors feel they have to deal with them.

But Goldman Sachs is also known for a certain swagger - perhaps a feeling that the firm is king of the hill, able to hire some of the best people to manage a sophisticated trading machine.

“The major view of a vast number of agents around Wall Street is that Goldman Sachs is the firm they love to hate,” says David Kotok, chairman of Cumberland Advisors, an investment manager in Vineland, N.J.

“There are several reasons: They hire very smart people, and some of them come across as very arrogant,” Mr. Kotok says. “When you are smart and people are jealous of your success or you act in an arrogant way, you become unloved.”

There is also a perception on Wall Street that Goldman Sachs puts its own interest first, says Bob Brusca, an economist at Fact & Opinion Economics in New York. “All this stuff about how clients are important to them - it’s the same way sheep are important to wolves.”

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed charges against Goldman Sachs, alleging that some of the firm’s dealings in the financial crisis were fraudulent.

To many on Wall Street, the hearing is an attempt by Congress to embarrass Goldman Sachs, thus making financial reform look better. A major financial-reform package stalled Monday night as Senate Democrats failed to get enough votes to begin debate on it.

“Goldman Sachs is the poster child. They were the most efficient at taking advantage of what happened,” says Doug Roberts of Channel Capital Research Institute in Shrewsbury, N.J. “Goldman Sachs is the easiest target.”

In documents released by Congress, Goldman Sachs executives sometimes appear to be bragging about their ability to profit as the US housing market disintegrated. However, on Monday night, Goldman CEO Lloyd Blankfein issued a statement denying that the company was trying to profit from the housing crisis.

Still, the Goldman Sachs trading desk appears to have had its own doubts about some products it was trying to sell to clients. Documents released during the Tuesday hearing included disparaging comments by the salespeople about some debt instruments Goldman was trying to get clients to buy.

One Wall Street investment adviser, who requested anonymity because he is not authorized to speak for his firm, says that Congress’s scrutiny of the Goldman Sachs trading desk reveals a dichotomy on Wall Street: Sometimes a firm has a fiduciary responsibility, and other times it acts like a broker.

“When Goldman’s acting like a broker, it’s a matter of 'buyer beware,' ” he says. “The people who got duped were smart money, not dumb money.”

Kotok expects the government to extend its gaze to other securities firms and perhaps some hedge funds.

“My sense is that when this is over, there will be more firms, more hedge funds, more civil and criminal charges, and a very aggressive SEC which is unafraid of taking on Goldman Sachs or anyone else - and wants to redeem itself in the eyes of the world in light of Bernard Madoff and others,” he says.

Related:

Goldman Sachs hearing pulls back curtain on bankers' ethics

Related Tags:

Comments (4)

what we need is a Pecora Commission such as FDR set up in 1933, and used to implement a 7 page Glass Steagall bill which successfully regulated Wall Street until Clinton took it down in 1999, at the behest of Phil Gramm, and other GOP neanderthals.

I met a financial advisor on an airplane last week who teaches Sunday school in Virginia. I told him that we do not need Wall Street parasites sucking our life blood. He agreed, and said let them all go bankrupt. So you see that the Wall street Olympians do not even have support from their own professional class anymore.

Goldman Sachs owns Obama completely, so his "reform" bill is another 1500 page do nothing bill, same as health care. As a result, the populace is enraged at Congress, and the Democrats will get slaughtered in November.

//"You want the truth? You can't handle the truth. Son, we live in a country with an investment gap. And that gap needs to be filled by men with money. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Middle Class Consumer? Goldman Sachs has a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Lehman and you curse derivatives. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what we know: that Lehman's death, while tragic, probably saved the financial system. And that Goldman's existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves pension funds. You don't want the truth. Because deep down, in places you don't talk about at parties, you want us to fill that investment gap. You need us to fill that gap. "We use words like credit default swaps, collateralized debt obligation, and securitization? We use these words as the backbone of a life spent investing in something. You use 'em as a punchline. We have neither the time nor the inclination to explain ourselves to a commoner who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very credit we provide, and then questions the manner in which we provide it! We'd rather you just said thank you and paid your taxes on time. Otherwise, we suggest you get an account and start trading. Either way, we don't give a damn what you think you're entitled to!"//

Goldman was smart, told people what they didn't want to hear, got laughed at, turned out to be right and made a bundle. How dare they!

The Abacus deal, however, is fraud.

Shades of Enron employees bragging about how they suckered little old ladies.

I want to see a documentary called "The Smartest Guys In the Room: Part II."