Skip to Content

Declining suburbs: Twin Cities-area project focuses on how to revitalize communities

U.S. Census findings point to a decline in the populations of many Twin Cities suburbs.
Courtesy of 'The New Metropolis'
U.S. Census findings point to a decline in the populations of many Twin Cities suburbs.

Coming on the heels of recently released U.S. Census findings pointing to a decline in the populations of many of the Twin Cities older suburbs, an upcoming forum is sure to get people talking and thinking.

The event Wednesday, March 30, is dubbed a community engagement project and showcases a thought-provoking two-part documentary about the downward slide of all too-many of America's first suburbs as well as efforts to revitalize them.


Wide open spaces as well as the promise of new homes, parks and schools have long lured Americans from the confines of big cities to outlying suburbs, as true in the Twin Cities as in other urban centers around the country. Only now there's migration from some of the oldest, first-tier suburbs to farther flung areas. 

Some of those very same 'burbs that evolved following World War II as residents sought out their "own little piece of paradise'' according to the film, are now down-at-the-heel and experiencing declining infrastructure, boarded up homes, lost commercial tax base and population loss, as well as growing diversity.

Hosted by 1000 Friends of Minnesota and Twin Cities Public Television, "New Metropolis Minnesota: Growing Together as a Region" is intended, says Jill Mazullo, 1000 Friends spokeswoman, to "spark cross stakeholder conversations" about how public institutions can respond to changing demographics and fiscal environments in the suburbs. Or, as the organization says in an inimitably Minnesota way on their website: "We're helping Minnesota grow without wrecking the place.''

To that goal, the video "The New Metropolis" crafted by filmmaker Andrea Torrice, will help launch a community dialogue about the region's older suburbs from 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. March 30 at the Bloomington Center for the Arts. Register here.

The film — in its two parts: "A Crack in the Pavement" and "The New Neighbors'' — looks at a range of issues impacting American communities, says Torrice, who will be here from her home in Cincinnati for the showing.

Human face on policies
The intent is to encourage discussion and put a human face on the impact of public policies on land use and transportation that encourage settlement away from the urban core and first-tier suburbs. In a video snippet I previewed, officials and environmentalists lamented resulting loss of undeveloped land, reduced animal habitat, increased air pollution.

"I'm very concerned about all the communities in America, the way we are growing and the way we are becoming more unequal, both economically and in terms of racial segregation,'' Torrice said.

Two panel discussions, hosted by Terri Thao of Nexus Community Partners, follow. Reactors include Metropolitan Council Chair Susan Haigh, Richfield City Manager Steve Devich, Northwest Area Foundation vice president of programs Gary Cunningham, Eden Prairie Somali community advocate Ahmed Jama, HACER (Hispanic Advocacy and Community Empowerment through Research) Executive Director Rodolfo Gutierrez, former Minneapolis Board of Education Director Chris Stewart and others.  

For Jama, one of those responders, the event will be a way of initiating a civil conversation about such issues as equal educational opportunities for all children. Jama was involved in the explosive school boundary dispute in Eden Prairie schools, an experience he characterizes as "very hateful.''

"The New Metropolis" discussion will allow Richfield city officials to describe efforts to renew what they call their "urban hometown" city bordering Minneapolis. "Every first-ring suburb of our age has to figure out how to reinvent themselves,'' Richfield Mayor Debbie Goettel told me.

Renewal accomplishments
Among her city's recent renewal accomplishments are a new and healthier government center and a public works building with partial geo-thermal heating, safer sidewalks, a city program to buy and fix up for resell foreclosed homes, and first-time homeowner loans.

"We're a really centrally located suburb with decent, affordable housing stock, good schools and some of the best [bus] ridership in the Twin Cities,'' Goettel said proudly.    

In the first of the pair of films Minnesota merits attention for its regional planning efforts and for comments from University of Minnesota author and law professor Myron Orfield and his studies on changing cities.

Orfield's research, according to the film, has shown a connection between government policies that promote movement and the economic decline of cities and their surrounding suburbs.

The documentary and the forum will be aired on tpt sometime in May, Mazullo said.

Comments (3)

I won’t be able to attend, and that’s too bad because irony abounds.

I live a couple blocks from Brooklyn Center, founded in 1912 by Minneapolis residents hoping to escape “the plague of immigrants” then moving into the city. It may not be THE earliest example of prejudice-based migration around, but it’s likely to be on the short list. Brooklyn Center is now, according to the latest census figures, the first “minority-majority” community in the metro area.

Having lived most of my life in inner-ring suburbs in 3 different metro areas/states, decline is a familiar problem. I’d have higher hopes for the upcoming forum if it were less a case of preaching to the choir. It’s the sorts of people who are likely to find the outer-ring and exurban areas attractive that need to hear and see this message, and they’re unlikely to be in the audience in appreciable numbers. State legislators who have some influence on transportation policies come immediately to mind as people who might benefit from the discussion, but with the legislature in session, I’m going to guess that few, if any, will be in attendance. Susan Haigh’s presence as a “reactor” might be interesting, but I’m new enough to the area to be unsure about the influence the Met Council’s head might have on the relevant policies.

I think we’ll have a hard time bucking the existing system, based on local control of both transportation and zoning policies. Zoning, in particular, can be used, and has been used, as a method to enforce economic segregation by requiring minimum lot sizes that force home prices upward, prohibiting multi-family housing in the same area as single-family, etc., etc. I’d be very surprised if municipal officials in currently-affluent outer-ring areas would be willing – or able – to persuade their constituents that economic diversity might be a healthy thing.

Population is a statistic that should be taken with a "grain of salt". I still co-own my late parents house in Maplewood, an inner ring suburb that still has expansion room. The residents per house number is way down compared to my childhood. This can be a sign of relative affluence.

That said, when I bought my (homestead) house in the Longfellow neighborhood of Minneapolis in 1986 it cost 20% less than a comparable inner ring suburb house. Now the opposite is true.

The inner-ring suburb decline seems common in Europe.

I'm curious as to whether or not this decline has more to do with an aging inner-ring suburban population. I wonder if anyone has some insight?