This content is made possible by the generous sponsorship support of The Minneapolis Foundation.
Identifying who’s poor in Minnesota and why
Angela Baerthel wants off of public assistance, but that’s proved difficult. She was laid off her job in 2010 and even a small business effort hasn’t worked out. “I don’t want my kids to be on welfare,’’ she says.
Renee Barron headed to college when her children started school, but a divorce and the Great Recession, threw her off balance. A recent four-year graduate of the University of Minnesota, she can’t find employment.
“We went from middle class to low income, and it’s been a struggle ever since. What I see is a lot of people who don’t have jobs,’’ says Barron.
MinnPost photo by Cynthia BoydAngela BaerthelBaerthel and Barron, whom I met Wednesday at Opportunity St. Paul, a conference convened by the Community Action Partnership of Ramsey & Washington Counties to re-energize the local war on poverty, are just the kind of people a new report from the Greater Twin Cities United Way is talking about.
The 70-page study, called “Faces of Poverty 2012,’’ is an in-depth look at the root causes of economic inequality in Minnesota — both situational poverty, such as that ignited by the recent economic crisis, and generational.
Worth noting, the study declares that between ages 20 and 75 “more than half the population (59 percent) will have experienced at least one year in poverty.” Further, two thirds will “at some point” live in a household receiving some type of welfare or cash assistance program, a grouping that includes children.
The report defines the poor – they include ex-inmates and military veterans, children, single parents and families – as well as explores the connections between poverty and race, high school graduation rates and other factors.
Beyond the data
Like the conference, which drew 350 registrants, the report is meant to be a “powerful engagement tool” to bring the issue of poverty into the societal spotlight, says Sarah Caruso, president and CEO of Greater Twin Cities United Way.
“We wanted to go beyond the data, to look at the underlying causes and types of poverty,’’ she says, and then engage the community in conversation.
To that end, starting April 16, United Way will launch four online, interactive conversations here. The first topics to be discussed are situational poverty and unemployment.
At the conference held in St. Paul — where nearly one in four residents, including almost 40 percent of its children, live in poverty — keynote speaker Gene Nichol scolded:
“We have proven steadfast in being able to ignore the poverty in our midst,’’ despite President Lyndon Johnson’s 1965 declaration of war on poverty. Nichol is director of the Center on Poverty, Work and Opportunity at the University of North Carolina.
The middle-class worker, he said, is “making less today that his daddy did,’’ though the one-percenters, the nation’s highest income earners, are buying 24 percent more high-end Gucci products and 20 percent more expensive Tiffany products than in recent times.
Some 46 million Americans, or about 15 percent, now live in “stark poverty” in this the wealthiest country in the world, he said, with the top 1 percent having more wealth than the bottom 70 percent combined. Fifty million Americans “literally do not have enough to eat,’’ he said.
Personal struggles
In work sessions, conference attendees from government, private, non-profit and public sectors and all walks of life discussed their work or their personal struggles with poverty. Some pledged to join small groups to meet during summer and into fall to recommend specific efforts to end poverty in St. Paul.
As for the United Way report, Elizabeth Peterson, who co-authored the report with Devon Meade, calls it informative and “sobering.” The agency’s director of research and planning, she blogged these key points:
- Young children are the age group most likely to be in poverty: 16.1% of Minnesota’s children under age 6 are living in poverty. That’s nearly 1 in 6.
- More than 1 in 3 of Minnesota’s African Americans and American Indians live in poverty, with poverty rates of 34.8% and 37.9% respectively.
- The most common event that pushes a household into poverty is losing a job or having wages and/or hours cut. Between 2007 and 2011, the number of long-term unemployed individuals in Minnesota (out of work for at least six months) climbed to 75,800, an increase of 335%. More than half of the long-term unemployed have been unemployed for more than a year.
- The cost of childhood poverty in the United States is about $500 billion per year—nearly 4% of the GDP.
“The biggest surprise to me was the extent of deep poverty, or extreme poverty,’’ she said, with 44 percent of the poor living at half the poverty level, which is $11,525 for a family of four persons.

Also significant, she found, was the recession’s crushing impact on populations of color. Hispanic families, for instance, on average, lost 66 percent of their personal wealth, which includes the value of a house, savings and other assets.
Such economic losses, she says, “really made the playing field, which was really unlevel, even more unlevel’’ and increased inequality and the academic achievement gap. People with money pay for education, books and tutors for their children, she says.
As for the women I met, both are hopeful. Last fall Baerthel started college. Barron has started a nonprofit she hopes one day will pay her a salary.
More like this
- Report: Child poverty rate hits 20 percent in US as families struggle
- Advocates for needy say bipartisan support emerging for increased spending
- Why Minnesota's poorest kids will stay poor
- More precise census figures reveal higher numbers of Minnesota children in poverty
- MinneMinds makes the case for more state spending on poor kids
Recent Stories
Most Commented
-
30 comments
-
26 comments
-
26 comments
-
21 comments
-
19 comments

Comments (6)
White Earth Tribe's offer to pay state's $400 million share
of the cost for a new Vikings stadium in exchange for being allowed to build a casino in the metro area was, according to today's StarTribune, virtually ignored by state government, even though it would:
(1) Save state taxpayers the $800 million or so it would cost to repay the $400 million over time
(2) Create jobs and casino income for tribal members
If 37.9% of White Earth tribal members are living in poverty and would be helped by this investment on their part (no taxpayer dollars) to make life better for them, how can the Minnesota legislature and the governor hesitate for a minute before saying Yes, Oh Yes?
The current mish-mash of increased types of gambling that may or may not provide sufficient funds to repay the $800 million should be another big reason not to dismiss this offer.
How can they say no?
Because they like the money the other tribes are giving them to stop any such proposals.
Thank you!
I liked reading the stories of Angela Baerthel and Renee Barron. They make great bookends to a very meaty article.
I note with appreciation that Greg Kaufman created a link to your article at the website of THE NATION (April 13, 2012). I am trying to educate myself about poverty, so that I can do my part to fight the prejudice and misinformation that add insult to the many injuries already suffered by the poor.
We need to go "beyond the data" - but we mustn't neglect the data, either. I thank you for both the research and the individual stories.
Thanks Eric
I'm happy to have had a voice to enlighten others! Glad you benefited from my story!
Personal Story
Thanks Cynthia for telling OUR stories, I think many people don't consider the hard work a lot of us are doing to improve our economic status, this is an eye opening article and I appreciate having a voice!
Renee
thoughts about confrence
I want to share with you Cynthia and Renee what I came away with that day after the conference.
I took the day off of school to attend actually.
I was quite disappointed and walked away with nothing gained.
It was sad to see that there was not more action then and there. I am sure peoples hearts are in the right place but I felt it was a big waste of time.
I already know the homeless numbers. I was one of those numbers and now I work hard to make sure it never happens again. We must also understand no one can plan to be homeless. It can happen to anyone.
I see a need.
Programs for families who work hard to survive. Families who have goals to get off of welfare and Section8. That do not want to live off this funding for life.
But have to,for now.
It would be nice to see a few programs geared toward these families.
Some may need help on which direction to take because we/they (caregivers) have been at home talking care of children while another parent worked for a number of years. Education should be a high priority and having money, grants and scholarships for this should be exploited. Not a hand out but a hand up and out. The middle class is now a further reach up and the gap needs to be closed.
Once or twice a year a family might need help with basic needs that food stamps can't buy and no one to help,or maybe you just got a job and were cut off from welfare. Welfare programs should be extended at least three to six months to help the family get back on their feet before cutting it off within three-six weeks. The way it is done now just keeps families in a consent circle of lifelong poverty to be passed on to the next generation.
Point being not all of us are able to keep up with the rising costs of everything now days.
I have done massive research on programs for the last five years online and books, to help with this very need but there are no programs that I have come across,unless you are in severe homelessness, addicted to drugs or have a felony.
I feel we are rewarding bad behavior. Last time I checked if you want to do drugs or drink it is a choice.
Thank you for your wonderful Article and giving hardworking families a Voice.
Angela B