SERVING MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL / MINNESOTA

MinnPost thanks these major sponsors:


Sponsor of
Second Opinion



MinnPost thanks these generous donors of $25,000 or more:

MAJOR FOUNDATIONS

John S. and James L.
  Knight Foundation
Blandin Foundation
McKnight Foundation
Minneapolis Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation

INDIVIDUALS & FAMILY FOUNDATIONS
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Sam & Stacey Heins
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown
  Foundation
(See all donors here.)

MinnPost.com Job Listing of the Day!
MinnPost.com Job Listing of the Day!

Browse
Minnesota Jobs
Direct from Company Websites!

Unadvertised,
Current,
Highest-quality

Start Searching Now!

This content is made possible by the generous sponsorship support of Greater Twin Cities United Way.
  • Switch to Small Text Size
  • Switch to Medium Text Size
  • Switch to Large Text Size
Recommend to a friend Print Submit a Comment

    Don't stop at the top: Federal agencies need new talent at all levels

    By Rich Gehrman | Friday, Jan. 16, 2009

    President-elect Barack Obama has started to rebuild leadership at the top levels of government. With few exceptions his nominations for Cabinet and advisory posts have been highly respected. But this process should not end with the president's team. Federal agencies are badly in need of new talent at every level.

    Experienced managers and technicians have been leaving at an accelerated rate for years, and they are not being replaced by new recruits. Going forward, the General Accountability Office estimates that an additional one-third of senior workers will leave by the end of Obama's first term, taking with them the institutional memory needed to maintain core government systems.

    It is useful to understand how this problem developed. Most important, since Ronald Reagan first said "Government is the problem, not the solution," opinion makers of all political stripes have made government service seem a particularly bad idea. Little wonder that people who might have considered this career made other choices instead.

     

     

    Downsizing, complexity contributed to loss
    There are systemic reasons as well. First is downsizing. During the 1990s alone, 400,000 jobs were eliminated from the federal government. Staff who remained had to absorb the duties of lost colleagues.  At the same time government got more complex. Software systems became more numerous and specialized. Major new assignments were piled on — think Medicare Part D, new weapons systems, and the Transportation Safety Administration. The resulting burnout caused attrition to accelerate as staff retired early or found other work.

    It is easy to see the impact of these losses in agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration and the Securities and Exchange Commission, which can no longer protect us either from toxic toys or toxic assets. But skills are being lost in many other less visible but equally important areas.

    All this indicates an urgent need for new talent. Some elements of a solution are already emerging. Excitement about the new administration alone will certainly give a boost to recruitment efforts. Obama's proposal for a National Service Academy is also a positive, practical step. However, its projected numbers are small compared to the gap. Additional recruitment strategies are needed.  

    Lower barriers to job entry
    First, we need to make it easier for people to get their first government job. Several years ago the Brookings Institution found that over two-thirds of liberal-arts graduates are strongly interested in public service. The problem is they can't get in the door. The civil-service exam process typically takes at least six to nine months. Recent graduates usually do not have the resources to wait that long, so they take other jobs. This barrier to entry must be lowered.

    We must also create more entry-level openings. This could be done by reducing "staff augmentation," which is the practice of using contracted staff to do the same jobs as federal employees. Contracting for services makes sense in areas where the government lacks specialized skills. But using contractors to do regular government work is expensive and adds no value. 

    These issues can be addressed first by hiring entry-level professionals as temps until they pass civil-service exams.  This will get new graduates into federal jobs quickly. These staff can be trained to support managers and technicians in the most critical areas while being paid what they will receive as regular employees rather than at consulting rates.  Most of these individuals will gain civil-service status within a year, allowing the government to phase out the contract positions.

    This approach will not just have immediate benefits. Experience with internship programs indicates that many of these recruits will stay and become the next generation of senior managers and technical staff.

    Use better recruitment methods
    In the longer term, federal human-resource managers can implement better recruitment techniques, starting with ones that are already working in many state and local governments. For example, post exams online for frequently filled positions and score them within two weeks. Develop broad entry-level job descriptions to get recent graduates into the system more easily. Accept some credentials as equivalent to a civil-service exam — i.e. take a degree in accounting or project management as sufficient proof that a candidate is qualified for a particular post.

    Through these and similar strategies we can ensure that Obama's success in recruiting his leadership team can become a blueprint for the federal government as a whole.

    Rich Gehrman is a management consultant to government and higher education in program development, finance and human resources. He is a former director of Finance and Administration for the City of St. Paul.


    Want to add your voice?

    If you're interested in joining the discussion by writing a Community Voices article, email Susan Albright at salbright [at] minnpost [dot] com.

    Community Voices | Fri, Jan 16 2009 7:11 am

    Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.


    Want to add your voice?

    If you're interested in joining the discussion by writing a Community Voices article, email Susan Albright at salbright [at] minnpost [dot] com.

    1 Comments: Hide/Show Comments

    1 Comment: Hide/Show Comment

    0 Comments:

    E-mail address

    Password

     

    Forgot Password? | Register to Comment

    MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.

    We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.


    medium_GTCUnitedWay125.jpg

    Join the movement to LIVE UNITED to build pathways out of poverty and create opportunity for all. United Way stabilizes people in crisis and works to streamline systems and solutions for lasting change.


    Community Voices features opinion pieces from a wide variety of authors and perspectives. MinnPost welcomes submissions on current topics of broad interest in Minnesota. We suggest that they be limited to 800 words.

    If you'd like to join the discussion by writing a Community Voices article, email Susan Albright at salbright [at] minnpost [dot] com.

    Recent Community Voices