SERVING MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL / MINNESOTA
Donate Now Sustaining Member


Our major sponsors




Sponsor of
Second Opinion



Our major advertisers


Our in-kind partners


MinnPost thanks these generous donors:

INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik

(See all donors here.)

Community Voices

  • Switch to Small Text Size
  • Switch to Medium Text Size
  • Switch to Large Text Size
Email Print Submit a Comment

    Pawlenty is a lame duck

    Thursday, May 28, 2009

    The following is an editorial from the Albert Lea Tribune. It was published Wednesday, May 27, and is reprinted with permission.

    Minnesota has a lame-duck governor.

    Oh, sure, Eagan's Tim Pawlenty could try to seek re-election, but he would not succeed. Not when he is going on statewide radio and calling city officials names. He went on WCCO radio last Friday and called the leaders of Albert Lea, St. Paul and Wadena "complainers."

    It was in response to mayors across the state calling on the governor to minimize cuts to local government aid. They didn't say don't cut it. They just wanted to keep the reductions reasonable considering increases in cost of living.

     

     

    The mayors surely don't call Gov. Pawlenty names. They simply disagree with him. Pawlenty, however, gets down in the mud. He wouldn't make such an uncalled-for move if he wanted to keep his job.

    No, our fair governor has national ambitions. By using his powers of unallotment and line-item veto, he is sidestepping a state budget formed in a populist and more democratic manner and going it alone.

    He wants to impress Grand Old Party bosses and get a seat at the front row at the political game in Washington, D.C.

    The legislative process requires compromises. If one branch gets too much power, there aren't compromises. Next year — or maybe in 2011 after Pawlenty is out — the Legislature needs to review Minnesota's legislative process and work out the kinks. Get rid of or at least redefine unallotment, and take a hard look at whether line-item veto really works. It was a political fad, like a hula-hoop, and our state bought it. Time to lose the hula-hoop.

    Community Voices | Thu, May 28 2009 8:00 am

    Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.


    Want to add your voice?

    If you're interested in joining the discussion by writing a Community Voices article, email Susan Albright at salbright [at] minnpost [dot] com.

    5 Comments: Hide/Show Comments

    E-mail address

    Password

     

    Forgot Password? | Register to Comment

    MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.

    We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.



    Community Voices features opinion pieces from a wide variety of authors and perspectives. MinnPost welcomes submissions on current topics of broad interest in Minnesota. We suggest that they be limited to 800 words.

    If you'd like to join the discussion by writing a Community Voices article, email Susan Albright at salbright [at] minnpost [dot] com.

    Recent Community Voices