SERVING MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL / MINNESOTA
Donate Now Sustaining Member


Our major sponsors




Sponsor of
Second Opinion



Our major advertisers


Our in-kind partners


MinnPost thanks these generous donors:

INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik

(See all donors here.)

Community Voices

  • Switch to Small Text Size
  • Switch to Medium Text Size
  • Switch to Large Text Size
Email Print Submit a Comment

    Double Play: An argument for expanded instant replay in baseball

    By Matthew McNeil | Monday, Sept. 28, 2009

    As the Minnesota Twins try to catch the Detroit Tigers, something unfortunate is becoming more likely by the day. If the Twins finish one or two games out of first place, Minnesota baseball fans will have a real beef with Major League Baseball's umpires.  Earlier this season, a blown call on the final play of a game negated the Twins' tying run, and a litany of bad calls in another game might not have directly affected the outcome, but then again, they gave the other team three runs in a game the Twins lost by two.

    The first game was July 20, when the Twins played at the Oakland A's. The team took national ridicule as it let the A's make up 10 runs, eventually losing 14-13, but the final out came at home plate with Michael Cuddyer safely sliding into home to tie the game, until the home plate umpire, Mike Muchlinski, blew the call. It wasn't even close. I know many have said the Twins didn't deserve to win because they let the other team come back, but that's irrelevant. Even if it was a 2-1 final, the tying run was wrongly called out on the final play of the game, and although that would have only tied the game, we'll never know what the eventual outcome should have been.

     

     

    The second game was Aug. 7, at the Detroit Tigers, a 10-8 loss that saw 3rd baseman Brendan Harris tagging Curtis Granderson in a rundown (something Granderson himself admitted). The ump called him safe, but made no vocal signal, allowing for Granderson to score as the Twins thought he was out. Later, a Detroit hit down the first base line bounced into the corner, was picked up by a fan, who then dropped the ball back onto the field, as Twins 2nd baseman Nick Punto waited for the fan interference call. When Punto realized the umpires missed that call, he quickly picked up the ball and fired it on a dime to Twins catcher Joe Mauer, who appeared to tag the second Tiger runner before his foot hit home, only to have the second run ruled safe. Granted, the fan interference call would have left the bases loaded, and there is no way to determine what would have happened later in the game, but in the end, there were three Tiger runs that were awarded, not earned.

    Umpires' mistakes are fixable
    I know smarter baseball minds will look at this only as sour grapes. I'm not saying we try to overturn those two outcomes. What's done is done, and if those two games cost us a title, so be it. There are plenty of other losses the Twins have had this year where the effort on the field was the culprit, but the mistakes umpires make are fixable with simple instant replay.

    As the major sports leagues have acknowledged the fallibility of human perception and, in turn, welcomed a level of instant replay, baseball, buoyed by umpire arrogance, has only allowed it on homerun calls. The logic is, since the homeruns are so far away, there might be a slight possibility the ball was foul or it bounced on top of the wall, rather than over it. They insist calls closer to the infield couldn't possibly be wrong regardless of the video evidence. Umpires will insist they always make the right call, but if I may clarify:  When you make a bad call in a game, you're not making the "right" call, but rather the "official" call. There is a difference.

    Instant replay is not about proving the incompetence of the umpires, but rather making sure the right call is made. To expand out instant replay in baseball, they should first create the Cuddyer Rule, where, if it's the 9th inning or in extra innings, and where a game tying or winning run could be contested, the umpires automatically watch the replay and make sure they made the right call.

    Two official reviews
    As for the rest of the game, give each manager two official reviews, where regardless if the play is overturned or not, they still have only two reviews. The review has to be called for prior to the next pitch, and the review can be for numerous aspects of a specific play. That way, not only could a team question if a fan actually touched the ball, but if the umpires determine the fan didn't, they can still review other aspects of the play that lead to scoring.

    I will concede this will make an already excruciatingly slow game even longer (how about stopping the hitters and pitchers from taking a time out every single pitch?), but let me counter point the traditionalists and clock-watchers. If the Twins lose the American League Central by two or fewer games, ask their fans whether extending games out 10 or 15 minutes, and in turn, ensuring the right team plays at least three more games in October, would be such a hassle.

    Matthew McNeil is the host of a radio show on KSTP AM 1500.

    Community Voices | Mon, Sep 28 2009 7:00 am

    Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.


    Want to add your voice?

    If you're interested in joining the discussion by writing a Community Voices article, email Susan Albright at salbright [at] minnpost [dot] com.

    4 Comments: Hide/Show Comments

    E-mail address

    Password

     

    Forgot Password? | Register to Comment

    MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.

    We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.



    Community Voices features opinion pieces from a wide variety of authors and perspectives. MinnPost welcomes submissions on current topics of broad interest in Minnesota. We suggest that they be limited to 800 words.

    If you'd like to join the discussion by writing a Community Voices article, email Susan Albright at salbright [at] minnpost [dot] com.

    Recent Community Voices