SERVING MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL / MINNESOTA
Donate Now Sustaining Member


Our major sponsors




Sponsor of
Second Opinion



Our major advertisers


Our in-kind partners


MinnPost thanks these generous donors:

INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik

(See all donors here.)

Community Voices

  • Switch to Small Text Size
  • Switch to Medium Text Size
  • Switch to Large Text Size
Email Print Submit a Comment

    This year will mark an official sanction of U.S. torture

    By Chuck Turchick | Tuesday, Jan. 5, 2009

    Time is running out. Sometime in 2010, we will officially become a nation that sanctions torture.

    At the time the United States ratified the Convention Against Torture (1994), we also passed a federal statute criminalizing torture and conspiracy to torture (18 U.S.C. Secs. 2340 and 2340A-B). That statute has a statute-of-limitations period of eight years, meaning no charges can be brought against an alleged perpetrator if eight years has passed since the act of torture or conspiracy to torture.
     
    Make no mistake about it, we have tortured people. As an official policy, that began in 2002. It was a policy that "legalized," authorized, ordered and committed torture. The evidence is overwhelming. This has been confirmed even by our own officials, let alone by several respected international human-rights organizations.

     

     

    For example, Maj. Gen. Antonio Taguba, the man selected by the Pentagon to compile its report on Abu Ghraib, wrote more generally in a 2008 preface to a Physicians for Human Rights report that "the Commander-in-Chief and those under him authorized a systematic regime of torture." FBI interrogator Ali Soufan reported "borderline torture" to his superiors in Washington. Judge Susan Crawford, the convening authority for the Guantanamo military commissions, said early last year, "We tortured Qahtani. His treatment met the legal definition of torture. And that's why I did not refer the case [for prosecution]." (The Washington Post, Jan. 14, 2009).

    Alberto Mora's complaints
    Well before Abu Ghraib, then-Navy General Counsel Alberto Mora complained of effects reaching the level of torture at Guantanamo. In accepting the 2006 John F. Kennedy Profile in Courage Award, speaking of treatment of detainees at "Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, and other locations," Mora said: "We know the treatment may have reached the level of torture in some instances. And there are still questions as to whether these policies were related, if at all, to the deaths of several dozen detainees in custody."
     
    As the statute of limitations begins to expire on these acts that began in 2002, we will officially become a nation that sanctions torture. That is how our actions during this period will correctly be seen in the eyes of the world for time immemorial.
     
    Not only Bush administration officials will be so labeled. Under the United Nations Convention Against Torture (CAT), President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder have an affirmative responsibility to investigate allegations where there is a "reasonable ground to believe an act of torture has been committed." (CAT, Article 12). So far, with respect to this issue, neither of them seems to recognize that we are a nation of laws. President Barack Obama is not even interested in those who tortured, let alone those who instituted, authorized and implemented this policy. His only interest is in those who committed "torture-plus," the so-called "rogue" elements who exceeded the prescribed torture limitations.
     
    No willingness in Minnesota either
    Our own U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota, B. Todd Jones, also has jurisdiction to bring charges under the Federal Torture Statute. Unfortunately, no U.S. Attorney appointed by President Obama has shown the willingness to uphold their oaths of office, as some U.S. Attorneys in the Bush Administration had the courage and integrity to do, when they rejected orders from on high.
     
    Congress is implicated as well. Members who had knowledge of the torturing at the time it was occurring may well be responsible. Clearly, Democrats as well as Republicans had such knowledge, and this may explain the bipartisan lack of enthusiasm in pursuing this issue. The current Congress has shown virtually no interest in holding accountable the formulators and the perpetrators of our policy of torture. The Senate Judiciary Committee, on which both of Minnesota's senators sit, and which oversees the Justice Department, has put no pressure on the attorney general to make such prosecutions a priority. No one other than Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., has even suggested extending the statute of limitations period. Minnesota Sens. Amy Klobuchar and Al Franken won't even say they support the prosecution of torturers. Neither of their websites even mentions the word "torture."

    Regrettably, on the issue of accountability for torture, those in power are united. This conspiracy of silence will soon make it official. If you torture or conspire to torture in the name of the United States, no consequences will follow.

    This situation is so sad. And time is of the essence.

    Chuck Turchick is a retired Minneapolis resident who is concerned about torture and torture accountability issues. 

    Community Voices | Tue, Jan 5 2010 7:00 am

    Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.


    Want to add your voice?

    If you're interested in joining the discussion by writing a Community Voices article, email Susan Albright at salbright [at] minnpost [dot] com.

    6 Comments: Hide/Show Comments

    E-mail address

    Password

     

    Forgot Password? | Register to Comment

    MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.

    We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.



    Community Voices features opinion pieces from a wide variety of authors and perspectives. MinnPost welcomes submissions on current topics of broad interest in Minnesota. We suggest that they be limited to 800 words.

    If you'd like to join the discussion by writing a Community Voices article, email Susan Albright at salbright [at] minnpost [dot] com.

    Recent Community Voices