
Our major sponsors
Sponsor of
Second Opinion
Sponsor of
Community Sketchbook
Our major advertisers
Our in-kind partners

MinnPost thanks these generous donors:
INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik
(See all donors here.)
The following is an editorial that appeared in The Minnesota Daily.
In his last annual State of the State address, Gov. Tim Pawlenty deployed his self-deprecating, straightforward style to urge the assembled legislators to focus on creating jobs. To that end, Pawlenty renewed his call for reductions in corporate income and capital gains taxes and credits for research and small business investment.
Though this fresh focus on jobs was welcome, Pawlenty's proposals are already stale. He has long defined cutting taxes as the answer to most problems faced by the state, in good times and bad. Meanwhile, new and unprecedented challenges continue to mount.
To pay for these tax cuts on top of a $1.2 billion budget gap, Pawlenty warned of "dramatic and painful" budget reductions; he declined to use the annual address's bully pulpit to prioritize programs that might face the ax.
Pawlenty addressed these programs Monday at a press conference and outlined his plan, which apparently includes cutting $350 million from health services, $250 million in local government aid and almost $50 million from higher education — three-quarters of which hit the University of Minnesota. Pawlenty lamented that he could not take more, citing federal stimulus rules that prohibit cutting college funding below 2006 levels.
State tax cuts and structural deficits should not be financed primarily by students, local property taxpayers and hospitals. A more sensible solution would involve targeted cuts with some additional revenues from higher earners or user fees.
The Legislature must now exercise its authority to craft a better budget that can stare down Pawlenty's veto threats.
Reprinted with permission of the Minnesota Daily.
Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.
If you're interested in joining the discussion by writing a Community Voices article, email Susan Albright at salbright [at] minnpost [dot] com.
3 Comments: Hide/Show Comments
Forgot Password? | Register to Comment
MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.
We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.