SERVING MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL / MINNESOTA
Donate Now Sustaining Member


Our major sponsors




Sponsor of
Second Opinion



Our major advertisers


Our in-kind partners


MinnPost thanks these generous donors:

INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik

(See all donors here.)

Community Voices

  • Switch to Small Text Size
  • Switch to Medium Text Size
  • Switch to Large Text Size
Email Print Submit a Comment

    Minnesota should join the nuclear renaissance and lift its ban on new plants

    By Rolf Westgard | Friday, Sept. 10, 2010

    It was 52 years ago, in August of 1958, that the nuclear powered submarine USS Nautilus passed directly under the North Pole. Two days later, the Nautilus emerged, completing a four day 1,830-mile voyage under the Arctic ice cap.

    The Nautilus relied solely on power from its nuclear reactor, which propelled the big sub at a steady 20 knots. The design of the Nautilus pressurized water nuclear reactor, supervised by Adm. Hyman Rickover and his team, was the prototype for most of our current fleet of 104 civilian nuclear power plants.

    Whether at sea or on land, those nuclear reactors provide clean, safe power with the highest reliability and availability factor of any fuel source. U.S. nuclear plants generate 800 billion kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year, 20 percent of our electric needs.

     

     

    With its consumer bills during 1Q 2010, Xcel Energy included an insert titled "Your Electricity," which listed all of its power plant fuel sources by cost and reliability. Nuclear power led both lists as the lowest-cost and most-reliable power source for our largest utility.
       
    High capacity
    Minnesota's nuclear reactors at Prairie Island and Monticello have a capacity factor (uptime percent) of 90 percent, stopping only every 20 months or so for refueling and maintenance. By contrast, all U.S. wind farms in 2009 produced 72 billion kWh, which is 1.75 percent of total U.S. electric power at a capacity factor of about 27 percent.

    Like Minnesota, Canada's Ontario Province had a warm July. On July 8, 2010, the City of Ottawa hit 95 degrees and the province was using 25,000 megawatts (MW) of electric power. Gas and coal plants furnished 10,200 MW; nuclear 9,200 MW; and hydro 3,600 MW. Ontario's 1,100 MW of wind capacity managed just 107 MW on that day.

    Wind tends to be lowest on those hot summer days when there isn't a "breath of air," and air conditioners run hard. For July as a whole, Ontario wind averaged output at 10-20 percent of name plate capacity.

    It's probably time for the Minnesota Legislature to join the world nuclear renaissance and lift our state's ban on new nuclear power plants. Like the postman, neither snow nor rain nor heat nor other vagaries of weather stays those plants from the swift completion of their obligations.
     
    Rolf Westgard is a professional member of the Geological Society of America and American Nuclear Society. He is a guest lecturer on energy subjects for the University of Minnesota College of Continuing Education.

    Community Voices | Fri, Sep 10 2010 6:00 am

    Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.


    Want to add your voice?

    If you're interested in joining the discussion by writing a Community Voices article, email Susan Albright at salbright [at] minnpost [dot] com.

    43 Comments: Hide/Show Comments

    E-mail address

    Password

     

    Forgot Password? | Register to Comment

    MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.

    We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.



    Community Voices features opinion pieces from a wide variety of authors and perspectives. MinnPost welcomes submissions on current topics of broad interest in Minnesota. We suggest that they be limited to 800 words.

    If you'd like to join the discussion by writing a Community Voices article, email Susan Albright at salbright [at] minnpost [dot] com.

    Recent Community Voices