SERVING MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL / MINNESOTA
Donate Now Sustaining Member

MinnPost thanks these major sponsors:




Sponsor of
Second Opinion



Our major advertisers


Our in-kind partners


MinnPost thanks these generous donors:

INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik

(See all donors here.)

D.C. Dispatches by Cynthia Dizikes

  • Switch to Small Text Size
  • Switch to Medium Text Size
  • Switch to Large Text Size
Email Print Submit a Comment

    Oberstar joins other lawmakers opposing Obama's allocation of transportation funds

    By Cynthia Dizikes | Published Fri, Feb 27 2009 3:56 pm

    WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Rep. Jim Oberstar, who chairs the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, joined a bipartisan group of 14 senators and representatives today in protesting a provision in President Obama’s budget outline that would seek to change how funds are allocated through the highway, transit and airport programs.

    As it stands now, the law allows the money for a transportation or infrastructure project to be obligated for a multi-year period of time.

    Under the president’s proposal, that would change to a year-by-year appropriations process.

    The administration argues that such a rule would increase transparency and best-accounting practices. Opponents say that it would impede long-term state projects with added uncertainty over funding.

    “This was a rule that was developed by accountants who don’t understand how to build roads,” said Oberstar spokesman John Schadl.

    In fact, the change has been proposed by the Office of Management and Budget several times in the past and each time has been rejected by Congress, according to Oberstar.

    “To raise this issue again, now, when we have important work to do to rebuilt our nation’s crumbling infrastructure and create family-wage jobs, is both a contradiction and an unnecessary distraction,” Oberstar said yesterday in a statement.

    Washington Bureau | Fri, Feb 27 2009 3:56 pm | Comment

    Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.

    Advertisement:

    0 Comments:

    E-mail address

    Password

     

    Forgot Password? | Register to Comment

    MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.

    We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.


    Illustration by Hugh Bennewitz

    minnpost.com/cynthiadizikes


    Cynthia Dizikes is MinnPost's Washington, D.C., correspondent and covers Minnesota's congressional delegation and reports on developments out of Washington that are important to Minnesota readers. She received her master's degree in journalism from UC Berkeley and has worked as an intern in the Los Angeles Times' Washington bureau, reporting on a variety of topics, and as a reporter for the Anniston Star in Alabama. Her work has also appeared in the San Francisco Chronicle, the Oakland Tribune, Congress Daily and on National Public Radio. She can be reached at cdizikes [at] minnpost [dot] com.

    Recently published posts by Cynthia Dizikes