
MinnPost thanks these major sponsors:
Sponsor of
Second Opinion
Sponsor of
Community Sketchbook
Our major advertisers
Our in-kind partners

MinnPost thanks these generous donors:
INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik
(See all donors here.)
Last month, the Star Tribune's Jim Souhan wrote a column extolling the new Twins ballpark.
"The best thing about the park? It's small," Souhan wrote. "A small footprint forced the Twins to cantilever the left field upper deck over the bleachers, so that the last row of that upper deck is now the equivalent of the first row of the Metrodome's left field upper deck."
That last line captured my imagination. You see, I'm a ballpark geek. For a while, I helped run Ballpark Tours, an outgrowth of the old "Save the Met" crew. We were so peeved about hermetically sealed baseball that we arranged trips to where the grass still grows and you don't have to see a chiropractor after sitting down the third-base line.
After countless journeys, I have strong opinions about new ballparks as places to watch a ballgame. And as much as I appreciated Souhan's sentiments, I possess a moral advantage when passing judgment: I pay for my tickets. Having been a sportswriter, I know it's easy to go gooey when you rarely fork over your own dollars. What follows is a more detailed look at the new park, with other interesting comparisons to the Dome that Twins fans know and (mostly) loathe.

Any comparison between the new park and the Dome must acknowledge these specific advantages:
Legroom: The Dome's airplane-like squeeze factor is 31 inches; the new park's minimum is 33. The priciest lower-deck seats and the club level will have a roomy 36 or 39 inches of stretch. (Premium seats will also be wider: 20-22 inches, compared to the Dome's 19 inches, which is also the new ballpark's standard. Only the new left-field seats come in narrower, at 18 inches.)
Row width: One of the Dome's major bummers; at its worst, rows are 37 seats wide, creating knee-banging journeys if you're in a middle seat, or a lot of up-and-down at the ends. The longest row in the new park is 24 seats, and most rows are considerably shorter.
Amenities: Concourses that are twice as wide, open to the field, and allow you to circle the ballpark; plentiful bathrooms (double the Dome's for two-thirds the seating capacity) and lots of bars and restaurants.
And of course, I also must acknowledge the stadium's public financing: many of you remain as angry about that as my Save the Met buddies are about the Metrodome. I sympathize; I know what it feels like when all you're left with is a boycott. Still, the new ballpark is a reality, and this is for all the fans who will step inside.
Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.
4 Comments: Hide/Show Comments
Forgot Password? | Register to Comment
MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.
We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.