Skip to Content

Support MinnPost

MinnPost logo 2014 Summer Member Drive

Readers like you make MinnPost possible
Become a sustaining member today

Minnesota's senators will get a good view of the Supreme Court battle royale

Justice John Paul Stevens
REUTERS/Jim Young
Justice John Paul Stevens

WASHINGTON — The looming retirement of Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, and the need to replace him before the court reconvenes in October, adds yet another major item to Congress’ and the White House’s to-do list, despite the fact that the list was probably too big to complete before members effectively check out later this year to concentrate on the midterm elections.

The court process is likely to overshadow the rest of the legislation, and already Washington is abuzz with speculation over whom President Obama might nominate to the highest bench in the land.

“I hope that President Obama will nominate a successor who shares Stevens’ values and commitment to the rule of law,” Sen. Al Franken said in a statement. Franken and Sen. Amy Klobuchar are both members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which oversees the nomination process.

Klobuchar has been mentioned by several pundits as someone with an “outside” chance at the court nomination, though the former prosecutor has given no indication that she considers herself on any short list.

In a statement, Klobuchar said she looks forward to “considering the President’s nominee to be the next Supreme Court justice and I hope we will have a productive and civil exchange about that nomination.” Reading between the lines there, one notes that Klobuchar wouldn’t be considering anything if she were the eventual nominee.

She had a somewhat stronger denial when speaking with MSNBC host Chris Matthews on his “Hardball” show Friday.

“I couldn't get it because of my past speeches, you know, all the times, remember [Sonia] Sotomayor - the 'wise Latina woman'?  You can't imagine how many times I referred to myself as a 'wise Slovenian woman,' Chris.  It's over,” Klobuchar joked.

Confirmation process

To figure out when everything will go down in the confirmation process, it’s helpful to work backward. The Supreme Court’s first oral arguments after its summer break come on the first Monday of October - this year that’s Oct. 4. Given that the nominee will want to have some time to warm up (hiring staff, finding out where the bathrooms are, etc.), Democrats would like to get someone in place by the beginning of September.

However, much of August is taken up by the annual August recess, so that pushes things back into July. The Senate needs to take its time deliberating (hearings, nominee-senator meetings, debate, things like that), and to do all that comfortably one would assume the president would need to nominate someone before Memorial Day.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor
REUTERS/Larry Downing
Justice Sonia Sotomayor

In fact, that’s just what happened last year with Sonia Sotomayor. Justice David Souter announced his retirement at the end of April, Obama nominated her by the end of May, confirmation hearings began July 13 and ended later that month. Just before the Senate left for its August recess, she was confirmed on a 68-31 vote.

Obama and his allies will have exactly three more weeks this time, though they face a much more partisan Senate. Some Republicans are already putting out the word that top candidate Elena Kagan, the current solicitor general and former dean of Harvard law school, would provoke a fight.

Most Republicans issued statements that in so many words pointed toward tough hearings and high standards for strict constructionism. However, Tennessee Republican Lamar Alexander drew a line in the sand, saying in a statement that “in truly extraordinary cases, I reserve the prerogative to vote no on confirmation or even to vote to deny an up-or-down vote.”

Larry Jacobs, a political science professor at the University of Minnesota, said it won’t be easy for Obama to get his nominee through the Senate.

“It will be World War I trench warfare, akin to health care,” Jacobs said, adding that the White House is pushing to get financial reform legislation wrapped up before the next break to “clear the decks for the Supreme Court battle royale.”

Waiting in the wings

In fact, there’s quite a bit of legislation waiting in the wings that Democrats want to pass before lawmakers’ minds get consumed by the upcoming election.

  • Jobs: Chief on Rep. Keith Ellison’s list is a comprehensive jobs package, something not unlike a bill he co-authored that he says would create 1 million new jobs through local government hiring and funding for on-the-job training programs. So far, however, the Senate has chosen to take up jobs bills in a piecemeal form, so the future for Ellison’s bill is unclear.
  • Education: The House Education and Labor Committee, led on the right by John Kline, has begun the debate on the next version of No Child Left Behind. One might think there’s no way Democrats and Republicans can reach consensus, but of all the remaining major legislation, this one probably has the best chance of bipartisan support. Kline has complimented the “approach” taken by Education Secretary Arne Duncan, adding in a recent hearing that “whether we agree on every policy or not, the open and bipartisan process has truly been a breath of fresh air.”
  • Financial Reform: A bill has already passed the House, though it’s tough to read how this one will play out. Republicans say there’s a clear path to 80 votes if Democrats are willing to play ball and compromise. Yes, you’ve heard that line before on health care, but unlike on health care the path to more GOP votes is pretty clear - scale back the scope of the proposed Consumer Finance Protection Agency.  However, many progressives feel they’ve already compromised enough this term (see: Option, public), and are unwilling to compromise much more on another piece of major legislation. That and the fact that Dems feel they can win a knock-down-drag-out fight on this one, because fighting Wall Street is seen as a votes-winner.
  • Cap-and-trade: Like financial reform, this is an issue where a stronger bill passed the House but is unlikely to pass the Senate in its present form.
  • Appropriations: Not enough attention is paid to the fight on appropriations, where Congress decides what its real priorities for the year are. Fund something and it happens. Don’t, and it won’t. Theoretically, all the work needs to be passed before the start of the federal fiscal year (Oct. 1), though it’s entirely likely it won’t be and Congress will have to resort to a continuing resolution to keep the doors of government open. Congress is almost certain to miss its non-binding deadline of having a budget passed by April 15, and whether there will be one at all this year is a source of some debate.
  • Transportation: Rep. Jim Oberstar is expected to continue his push for a multi-year reauthorization of the surface transportation bill. Included in that is the politically thorny question of exactly how to deal with road funding, as gains in fuel economy are expected to depress revenue from the federal gas tax.
  • Immigration reform: It’s no secret that Obama wants legislation on immigration reform before the end of his first two years in office. The guess here is that he won’t get it.
  • Health care: Lawmakers on the left and right will still be talking about the biggest bill passed yet this year for the remainder of the year. On the left, Ellison said he still hasn’t given up on getting a public option passed. On the right, Rep. Michele Bachmann is leading the push for repeal. Both are unlikely - the public option doesn’t have enough votes in the Senate to pass through anything other than reconciliation (if that), and the Senate has already passed its one reconciliation bill for the year. And as we’ve mentioned many times before, Republicans mathematically can’t repeal health care reform until at least 2013.

Of course, at some point, this Congress will pack its bags and head home to fight the biggest remaining battle this year - the November midterm elections.

Get MinnPost's top stories in your inbox

Related Tags:

Comments (1)

Lord! How I've come to hate U.S. politics! The just say no people (read Republicans) will be out in force.