In foreign affairs speech, Pawlenty goes after Obama and Republicans

WASHINGTON — Tim Pawlenty called President Obama “timid and slow” in responding to the democratic movement in the Middle East on Tuesday and offered a foreign policy agenda of using the United State’s influence in the region to spur change.
Pawlenty, in a speech before the Council on Foreign Relations in New York, sought to differentiate himself at the same time from both the Obama administration and the current crop of Republican presidential candidates. While Obama has been too slow to embrace change in the Middle East, Pawlenty said, Republicans have moved away from their commitment to act as a world leader on foreign issues.
“The Middle East is changing before our eyes — but our government has not kept up,” he said. “The next president must do better. Today, in our own Republican Party, some look back and conclude our projection of strength and defense of freedom was a product of different times and different challenges. While times have changed, the nature of the challenge has not.”
In assessing Obama’s foreign policy approach, Pawlenty repeated a phrase from his presidential rival, Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann: Obama has “led from behind,” pointing to his hesitancy to address democratic uprisings in Iran, Egypt and Syria.
“I called for [Syrian President Bashar al] Assad’s departure on March 29; I call for it again today,” Pawlenty said. “We should recall our ambassador from Damascus; and I call for that again today. The leader of the United States should never leave those willing to sacrifice their lives in the cause of freedom wondering where America stands. As President, I will not.”
Budding democracies should be supported and encouraged to embrace human rights and popular rule, Pawlenty said. Hostile countries — “failed states” such as Iran and Syria — should be subject to economic sanctions and diplomatic pressure until they respect the rights of their people.
Pawlenty blamed Obama for not working harder to depose rulers such as Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak and Syria’s Assad, and he hasn’t been forceful enough in removing Libya’s Moammar Gadhafi, though he’s called for his ouster and committed American resources to supporting Libyan rebels.
“You can’t let a third-rate dictator thumb his nose at the President of the United States and the rest of the free world,” Pawlenty said.
On Israel, Pawlenty admonished Obama for saying the country’s 1967 borders should serve as a basis for negotiating a final peace with Arabs. Pawlenty outlined a peace plan in which Hamas is diminished and U.S. aid to the Palestinian government is contingent on the moderation of its leaders.
“It breaks my heart that President Obama treats Israel, our great friend, as a problem, rather than as an ally,” Pawlenty said. “We need to stand shoulder to shoulder with them.”
Pawlenty also spoke to the Republican base, highlighting American exceptionalism and saying the United States has the “moral clarity” to lead the world, based in its support for human rights, free elections and the freedoms of speech and religion.
“What is wrong is for the Republican Party to shrink from the challenges of American leadership in the world,” Pawlenty said. “America already has one political party devoted to decline, retrenchment, and withdrawal. It does not need a second one.”
Devin Henry can be reached at dhenry@minnpost.com.
More like this
- Pawlenty uses foreign policy speech to set himself apart from other GOP candidates
- Tough words, tighter sanctions for Syria, but no end to state-led violence
- Russian confidence growing in its vision for ending Syrian war
- Russia and China veto UN resolution on Syria, sparking outrage
- Should Obama call for Syria's Assad to go? And would it matter?
Recent Stories
Most Commented
-
40 comments
-
24 comments
-
22 comments
-
19 comments
-
18 comments
Comments (11)
'“failed states” such as Iran and Syria — should be subject to economic sanctions and diplomatic pressure until they respect the rights of their people.'
ROFLMAO !!!
Timmy fails again.
By *his own definition*, most of the Middle East countries are "failed states". Why? Because they do NOT "respect the rights of their people".
Is he going to 'reform' the "failed states" of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and the UAE? Of course NOT.
Conservative leadership appears to be an oxymoron in the real world.
Given that we are struggling to "win" in such obviously "failed" states as Afghanistan and Iraq (10 years and counting...) further projections of power are incredibly foolish and irresponsible.
Does anybody in the US even know these countries and politics well enough to push a specific leader or party to power? And by visibly backing one specific party or person, doesn't the backing of the US automatically decrease the credibility of that party or person (thanks again, Iraq and Afghanistan)?
We have an amazingly bad track record with that in the last half century, perhaps Mr. Pawlenty should read some modern history. Gunboat diplomacy is a dangerous relic of the past.
Social coersion in the Middle East will balance our budget and pay off our debt, too, I suppose. Good one, T-Paw.
"Charity begins at home."
Just out of curiosity, is there a large political constituency (besides the defense industry), for more Middle East military adventures?
It's difficult for me to decide who's more dangerous: TPaw or Shelley Bachmann.
Well now we know that Pawlenty knows just as little if not less about foreign affairs as he does economics.
“It breaks my heart that President Obama treats Israel, our great friend, as a problem, rather than as an ally,” Pawlenty said. “We need to stand shoulder to shoulder with them.” - Pawlenty
Guess who's looking for donors!
Checkbook a little light on funds Slapshot Tim?
Jeff Wilfahrt, Rosemount, MN
Should we trust this man to make decisions about war and peace? Should we trust him in any other regard?
" sought to differentiate himself at the same time from both the Obama administration and the current crop of Republican presidential candidates"
Any candidate who fails to differentiate himself from Bush 43 is a potential war criminal.
Whenever the latest nonsense from TPaw gets me really down and tense, I take out my copy of 'Courage to Stand", look for a time at the cover photo of big chested Tim, and I relax, knowing that he is in the ring fighting for us, making the world safe for democracy and justice.
How can anyone take the former Governor seriously, when his last 2 years of his term were spent courting the no tax conservatives at the detriment of most of Minnesota.
He travels the country exaggerating how he left the state with a balanced budget..
Don't forget, a bridge went down under his watch and many died..he has hedged that one for a long time.