Bachmann leads the way as candidates build 2012 war chests
WASHINGTON — It’s time, once again, to check on the coffers of Minnesota’s congressional candidates, now a mere 113 days until Election Day (and less than a month removed from two contested congressional primaries on Aug. 14).
Fundraising reports were due to the Federal Election Commission on Sunday, and here are some of the more interesting items we found sifting through the numbers over the weekend:
- Some of candidates have begun loaning their campaigns personal money to bolster fundraising numbers. The most egregious of these was 1st District Republican Allen Quist, who cut himself a $170,000 cut and raised only about $8,000 from outside the Quist family. Democrat Jim Graves ($150,000) and Republican Lee Byberg ($45,000) also loaned themselves sizable amounts of personal funds to get their campaigns off the ground.
- For many reasons, incumbents always have a natural fundraising advantage over their challengers, but nothing makes them happier than when the opposing party waits until mid-August to pick a candidate. With primary battles rage in their districts, Democrat Tim Walz and Republican Chip Cravaack are quietly amassing sizable war chests for a quick-and-dirty three-month fall campaign: Walz is sitting on $810,000 and holds a nearly 8-to-1 advantage over the best-funded Republican, and Cravaack has collected nearly $900,000 while the three DFLers looking to oppose him are spending themselves silly in the run-up to their primary.
- Few neutral political prognosticators expect Michele Bachmann to face much of a challenge in November, but her national prominence and Tea Party appeal still make her the top fundraiser in the state’s congressional delegation. In raising $1.9 million, she accounts for nearly one-third of all the money collected by Minnesota incumbents and challengers this quarter.
Without further ado, here’s a run-down of (rounded) fundraising totals from the last three months, as of June 30:
U.S. Senate
Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D): Raised: $950,000; On Hand: $5.5 million
Kurt Bills: Raised: $243,000
Bills won the GOP’s endorsement in the U.S. Senate race in late May, giving Republicans less than half the fundraising quarter to coalesce around their newly crowned candidate and, by extension, send him their money. In the end, his fundraising was pretty lackluster, just about one-fourth of Klobuchar’s haul.
This was technically Klobuchar’s weakest quarter this cycle, but well in line with her usual $1 million, give-or-take $100,000, showing. In her first re-election campaign, Klobuchar has a high approval rating, a sizable lead in early polling and a commanding money lead (Bills has raised about $280,000 total, but his cash-on-hand number wasn’t available over the weekend).
1st District
Rep. Tim Walz (D): Raised: $238,000; On hand: $809,000
Mike Parry: Raised: $53,000; On hand: $31,000
Allen Quist: Raised: $178,000; On hand: $165,000
As mentioned above, Quist’s fundraising total comes almost entirely from personal loans he’s made to the campaign. He’s putting that money to good use, at least, hitting the airwaves this week with the first ad in the GOP primary campaign between himself and state Sen. Mike Parry.
Parry’s fundraising numbers aren’t great, but a spokesman notes that his second quarter effort effectively doubles his fundraising total in the campaign so far (he’s been running since October). But whoever wins on Aug. 14 will have a significant fundraising hurdle ahead of them: Walz has saved up more than $800,000 for the fall campaign after his 2010 contest nearly depleted his funds.
2nd District
Rep. John Kline (R): Raised: $428,000; On hand: $1.3 million
Mike Obermueller: Raised: $250,000; On hand: $214,000
Kline remains a potent fundraiser and has a sizable cash advantage over his opponent, but that’s to be expected given his seniority in the delegation and his stature in Washington.
Obermueller, meanwhile, raised his quarter-million in just two months of work, well off Kline’s pace but still stronger than any other challenger in the state. Obermueller is the lone Minnesotan on the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee’s "Red to Blue" list of up-and-coming Democratic candidates, so decent fundraising should be in the cards from here on out.
3rd District
Rep. Erik Paulsen (R): Raised: $454,000; On hand: $1.5 million
Brian Barnes: Raised: $107,000; On hand: $56,500
Paulsen has proven a robust fundraiser and has now collected nearly $2.2 million for his second re-election campaign. That’s second most in the delegation, and no one is going to catch up with the leader (a one Michele Bachmann).
Barnes had his best fundraising quarter of the cycle so far, more than doubling his sum over the last six months of the campaign. But Paulsen still holds a staggering 27-to-1 edge.
4th District
Rep. Betty McCollum (D): Raised: $90,000; On hand: $206,000
Anthony Hernandez: Raised: $16,600; On hand: $5,000
While most lawmakers were ramping up their fundraising during the second quarter, McCollum reported her lowest three-month total since the first quarter of 2011. But McCollum is in a safe district, and, given her opponent’s fundraising numbers, not likely to need the extensive funding of other campaigns.
5th District
Rep. Keith Ellison (D): Raised: $260,000; On hand: $143,000
Chris Fields: Raised: $40,000; On hand: $34,000
Ellison is in a district as safe as McCollum’s, but he nearly tripled her fundraising number. Ellison holds only a 4-to-1 bankroll advantage over Fields (which is better than challengers in more competitive districts, like Obermueller, who trails Kline 6-to-1 in the 2nd), but the district demographics make it so that Ellison probably won’t astounding fundraising numbers to win in November.
6th District
Rep. Michele Bachmann (R): Raised: $1.9 million; On hand: $1.7 million
Jim Graves: Raised: $400,000; On hand: $404,500
Bachmann is a fundraising juggernaut, pulling in more than $1.8 million in individual contributions during her first full fundraising quarter as a U.S. representative seeking re-election. On Twitter, she reported more than 40,000 contributions, and it turns out many of those came from small donors: of the total $1.86 million in individual contributions she received, $1.2 million of them came from those giving less than $200. Between PAC contributions and miscellaneous business transactions (such as renting out office space to the Wisconsin Recall Action Fund), Bachmann raised nearly $2 million last quarter.
Since Bachmann’s fundraising prowess was obviously not at all damaged by her failed presidential bid, challenger Jim Graves’ job just quite a bit harder. After a $150,000 personal loan, he raised only about $250,000 this quarter, and finds himself $1.3 million in the hole in the cash banked department.
(While we’re at it, Bachmann’s presidential campaign is still nearly $940,000 in debt, but she’s working to pay that down, transferring $80,000 from her congressional campaign committee between April and May.)
7th District
Rep. Collin Peterson (D): Raised: $191,000; On hand: $820,000
Lee Byberg: Raised: $153,500; On hand: $119,500
For a Democrat in a red district and the ranking member on a important committee (Agriculture), Peterson is not a prolific fundraiser, evidenced by the $191,000 he raised last quarter being his best showing this cycle. Still, he has $820,000 in the bank for his November rematch with Byberg.
For his part, Byberg raised $110,000 and loaned himself $40,000, the third time in as many years he’s given himself a five-figure donation. His campaign is now $117,000 in debt.
8th District
Rep. Chip Cravaack (R): Raised: $394,000; On hand: $899,000
Rick Nolan: Raised: $128,000; On hand: $93,500
Tarryl Clark: Raised: $213,000; On hand: $259,000
Jeff Anderson: Raised: $50,000; On hand: $18,000
At the moment, Cravaack is sitting back and letting Nolan, Clark and Anderson beat themselves up and spend themselves dry ahead of their Aug. 14 primary. Cravaack raised nearly $400,000 last quarter, easily his best of the cycle, and the 8th District Republican, seen by most observers as the single most vulnerable Minnesota incumbent this cycle, finds himself with enormous cash advantages over all three of them.
Cravaack has a nearly 10-to-1 lead on the DFL-endorsed candidate Rick Nolan, who, after raising $93,000, had his best quarter of the cycle. At the moment, he has $93,500 to spend on both his primary campaign and, should he win there, the fall general election.
Clark raised $213,000, nearly $110,000 less than she raised in the first quarter, before the DFL endorsement convention. She has a 2.5-to-1 fundraising edge over Nolan in the primary. She’s raised more than $1 million for her campaign, behind only Cravaack ($1.4 million).
Jeff Anderson raised $50,000 and has an anemic $18,000 left to spend, with the DFL primary less than a month away.
Devin Henry can be reached at dhenry@minnpost.com. Follow him on Twitter: @dhenry
Related Tags:
Recent Stories
Most Commented
-
30 comments
-
26 comments
-
26 comments
-
22 comments
-
21 comments

Comments (8)
Bachmannn
The real question is:
How much of her funding comes from within Minnesota?
Within her Congressional district?
You could ask the same
about the Democrats. No difference there between the two parties.
Baloney
80% percent of Bachmann's money was from out of state. No one else was close. It does prove that she draws more crackpots nationally and that is somewhat encouraging for MN's reputation.
Have Greed, Must Lead
The inspired mission of Ms. Bachmann simply must be fueled by an excess of sponsor cash. She is one of the best glad handers on the planet, so it's no suprise that her little fists squeezing years worth of income for the normal citizen. Now to waste it on the campaign trail and, if HE permits, another glorious win for the glad hand queen.
Combat Metaphors
"Bachmann leads the way as candidates build 2012 war chests"
This is not so much a comment as a question and it is by no means singling out this story because this issue is rampant...
Are combat metaphors applied to political stories a new "journalistic" technique or have they been used for decades and I just didn't notice? It seems that we can't encounter a story about campaigning or affairs of state these days without being fed an excessive diet of words like "war, battle, attack, fight, clash" etc. or even milder words like "win, lose" (which smack at competition.)
I wonder how the government and the populace in general would approach bipartisan problem-solving if we dialed away from the hyperbole and chose words that didn't immediately inspire images of destructive conflict.
I thought Bachmann and Jim Graves were two Minnesota citizens vying for the opportunity to help govern the affairs of Minnesotans. I don't know one needed a "war chest" for that.
Again, this may be "old news" and I haven't noticed until now.
Bachmann
Has no interest in "helping govern the affairs of Minnesotans". Her interest is only to "accomplish" something for herself.
Why is that the real
Why is that the real question?
I'd be careful how you answer, you might not like what you find out about your own favorite Congressperson's campaign contributions.
War as metaphor?...
Maybe if one were to refer to Bachmann's war chest as Pandora's Box...would be more appropriate?
Or maybe too, war metaphor is in respect to "war by other means" Van Clauswitz.
Could be its a 'climatic' response; a seasonal assessment as in Dylan Thomas's
"A man may see from/ Roads he rides/ Summer and war/ on all sides."
Or 'war' is just the commonality of these sad times be it war or policy or politics?