Minnesota Democrats on board with Obama tax plan
WASHINGTON — President Obama’s opening volley in the tax cut battle that will likely be the hardest-fought of this winter’s lame duck Congress is largely in line with how Minnesota Democrats are approaching it.
Obama announced Monday he wants to extend the George W. Bush-era tax rates for those making less than $250,000 for one year. The tax cuts on high-income earners are scheduled to expire on Jan. 1, and Obama said his plan would provide an economic cushion to the middle class, while raising new revenues from wealthy Americans.
Republicans have long said, and affirmed again Monday, that they will only support an extension of the full tax cuts, including those for people making more than $1 million a year. Meanwhile, a group of congressional Democrats, including lawmakers like House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi and New York Sen. Chuck Schumer, had backed a plan that would have kept taxes low for those making up to $1 million, a significantly broader set of taxpayers than the one Obama focused on today. They backed off from that plan on Monday.
In the end, November’s elections will likely set the tone for end-of-the-year negotiations on taxes. In December 2010, Congress passed a two-year extension of the complete slate of Bush tax cuts a month after a midterm election that swept Republicans into control of the U.S. House. Congress is unlikely to take up any major tax legislation until after this fall’s elections, and that will dictate whether the taxes breaks are renewed in part (as Democrats want) or as a whole (as Republicans want).
But for now, Obama’s plan jives well with Democratic members of the Minnesota congressional delegation, many of whom have voiced support for a $250,000 plan in the past.
A tax cut for that income bracket was a main component of the budget plan introduced by Rep. Keith Ellison’s Congressional Progressive Caucus in March. On Monday, Ellison told MSNBC that he supported taxing those who make more than $250,000 and steering the savings toward either deficit reduction or reinvestments in the public sector.
“If you want to do something about deficit reduction, you’ve got to deal with serious amounts of money and that’s the way to do it,” Ellison said.
Rep. Betty McCollum,who has supported a $250,000 cut-off since at least the 2010 battle over the tax cuts, also voiced support for Obama’s plan.
“It is fundamentally irresponsible to continue borrowing billions from China to give additional tax cuts for upper-income earners,” she said in a statement. “The Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans should expire at the end of this year.”
Ellison and McCollum voted against the full extension in 2010, but Democratic Reps. Collin Peterson and Tim Walz supported the measure. Walz backed Obama’s plan on Monday, calling the proposed tax cuts “fiscally responsible.”
Rep. Collin Peterson, however, has been opposed to extending any of the Bush tax cuts since last fall’s debate over the deficit, when, in November, he said the committee tasked with establishing the parameters of a deficit reduction package should commit to ending all the tax cuts, even for those making less than $250,000.
Peterson had no immediate reaction to Obama’s plan Monday.
U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar joined her House colleagues in supporting the plan, calling it, "a balanced way" to reduce the deficit without hurting the middle class.
Devin Henry can be reached at dhenry@minnpost.com. Follow him on Twitter: @dhenry
Related Tags:
Recent Stories
Most Commented
-
34 comments
-
21 comments
-
17 comments
-
11 comments
-
10 comments

Comments (6)
Obama Gives Tax Breaks to All
"Obama announced Monday he wants to extend the George W. Bush-era tax rates for those making less than $250,000 for one year"
This is a lie. Under Obama's plan a person earning $500,000 per year would get an $8000 tax break, more than 10 times the $600 tax break someone at $50,000 around the median income would receive. The reason for that is that people making over $250,000 get all the tax breaks given to those who make up to that amount.
What is at issue is whether there should be an additional tax break for those who make over $250,000. For someone making $500,000 that would more than double their total tax break to $17,000, almost 30 times the tax break of someone making $50,000.
The result of any tax break is higher taxes on someone else. In this case, the bill will be paid by all of us at a later date. With middle income taxpayers likely picking up the bill for that hefty tax break given to the rich.
Kick can down road
Didn't we just go through this last year? The debt ceiling is next. That can will also get kicked down the road. Maybe we could elect people to do the job this year.
A record number of US citizens are giving back their passports
The biggest names lately are supporters of the Democrat party, like Denise Rich (who's husband was pardoned by Clinton) and one of the founders of Facebook. Both will save 10's of millions a year on taxes. There are no walls yet, so money and companies are still free to leave.
Insurance premiums
Tax, mandate, it's all dollars.
How many families making less than 40,000 a year who don't have medical insurance now have a few hundred dollars in their wallets at the end of each month?
Will veterans who get their medial care from the VA be required to get medical insurance? I've never once seen a mention of medical care for vets.
Targeted tax cuts
aren't fiscal policy, they're a political ploy to buy votes from the chosen ones.
It turns out that the tax revenue from "taxing the rich", i.e. allowing only some of us to keep the same tax rate that we paid under George Bush, would amount to about $85 billion a year.
Even if the democrats didn't turn around and spend it on something new, which is highly unlikely if you listen to people like Rep. Ellison, that's enough money to fund the federal government for about 8.5 days.
($3.795 trillion/365 = $10 billion per day * 8.5 days = $85 billion)
Cut taxes for everyone or cut taxes for no one.
tax hikes
Some say that, unless all provisions of 2001 and 2003 Tax bills are extended or finally made permanent, all tax payers will in effect pay more of income to Federal taxes. We must also wonder if President Obama is successful in just raising taxes on income over the $250,000 threashold and really keeping the rest at the same percent paid under current tax law, what happens with inflation, higher taxes on business sector always rolls downhill to the consumers.