
MinnPost thanks these major sponsors:
Sponsor of
Second Opinion
Sponsor of
Community Sketchbook
Our major advertisers
Our in-kind partners

MinnPost thanks these generous donors:
INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik
(See all donors here.)
By Derek Wallbank | Published Wed, Mar 10 2010 4:19 pm
WASHINGTON — A trio of House Democrats, including Rep. Keith Ellison and the chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee, today proposed a sweeping plan to save or create 1 million jobs, chiefly by spending $75 billion over the next two years so local governments and community groups can hire staff. The overall measure would cost about $100 billion over two years.
Ellison compared the measure to massive public works programs begun in the 1930s to combat unemployment during the Great Depression. “I don’t think our generation can do any less,” he said.
“If this was a hurricane, we’d already be there with emergency assistance,” agreed Ed and Labor Chairman George Miller, a California Democrat and close confidant of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
The bill suggests itself as a sort of omnibus jobs package, as it includes already approved provisions like $1.18 billion to hire 5,500 law enforcement officers, or $500 million to “retain, rehire and hire” firefighters.
Elizabeth Kautz, mayor of Burnsville and head of the U.S. Conference of Mayors, said the money would “respond to the needs of ‘Main Street America’” by giving communities the funds to re-hire positions they otherwise couldn’t fund. “We have cut and cut to the point that only bone is left,” she said.
It remains unclear how such an effort would be paid for. Miller said it’s an issue for “leadership to decide,” but suggested the money could come from unspent stimulus funds or simply add to the deficit under the logic that the deficit won’t improve until the nation’s employment picture improves. The latter may, however, be a violation of pay-as-you-go (PAYGO) rules recently passed by Congress.
Also unclear is how such a broad plan might be received in the Senate, where Majority Leader Harry Reid stripped a bipartisan $85 billion jobs plan down to $15 billion. That plan passed the House by a narrow margin - despite charges from progressives that it didn’t do nearly enough to actually create jobs.
Update: John Kline, ranking member of the Education and Labor committee, signalled that few Republicans would likely back Ellison and Miller's bill.
“Democrats in Washington are wildly out of touch with the American people," Kline said in a statement. "There’s no other explanation for their plan to spend another $100 billion we do not have on an initiative that will not promote lasting economic recovery and growth."
"“Keeping states and local communities dependent on the federal government while ignoring private sector job creation will only exacerbate our long-term economic challenges. State governments will never be able to cover their budget deficits if families in their communities are kept out of the job market. Our children and grandchildren simply cannot afford another unaccountable federal spending binge."
Kline's remarks were backed by Georgia Republican Tom Price, who added that "spending more money that we simply don’t have just to bolster government payrolls defies all economic logic and brings us no closer to sustainable job growth."
Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.
2 Comments: Hide/Show Comments
Forgot Password? | Register to Comment
MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.
We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.