Skip to Content

Bachmann and Grayson in Time: "Welcome to the Funhouse."

An essay just posted in Time magazine takes Minnesota's own Michele Bachmann, mixes the recently prominent liberal flamethrower from Florida, Rep. Alan Grayson, and uses them to symbolize the death of political civility and the new formula that enables junior members of Congress to become national celebrities: Call the other side names.

Grayson, a freshman, if you haven't tapped into him yet, got suddenly famous a few weeks ago for saying, on the floor of the House, that the Republican health care plan was based on two messages, To the well: "Don't get sick;" To the sick: "Die quickly." He has declined several gazillion demands that he apologize.

In the case of Bachmann, Time relied heavily on a couple of her recent statements, about the health care plan providing sex/abortion cliinics via high schools, about Obama's "gangster" government. Minnesotan's are aware that she's been saying what, in Minnesotaspeak are called "interesting" things for quite a while.

A couple of excerpts:

"For Grayson and Bachmann, the objective is both to rally their loyalists and to rile the other side. Cable news embraces this sort of stuff...

Grayson and Bachmann have found ways to use the controversies surrounding their outbursts to raise money and broaden their reach. Their devoted followers respond to appeals. Grayson posted his CNN caveman quip on a website he created... (Almost 10,000 individuals gave Grayson more than $250,000 immediately after the 'die quickly' speech.) Bachmann, meanwhile, took her fundraising appeal to social media and talk radio, asking her supporters to send a message to 'Big Sister Pelosi and Big Brother Reid' and the 'gangster government.' It worked. 'The left can't ignore $118,000!!!' she announced on Twitter, boasting of a three-day online fundraising haul.

'The interesting dynamic here is that you used to be penalized by the public for not being civil,' says Republican strategist John Feehery, who worked for former House Speaker Dennis Hastert. 'Now it's almost glorified.'

'It's all theater,' says South Carolina's James Clyburn, the House Democratic whip. 'People have learned to speak in sound bites and look to generate headlines.' That insight is key. The headlines are what matter most, not the substance. And in Congress today, the loudest carnival barker gets the crowds."

Comments (7)

I haven't heard much of Grayson's rehtoric but calling the Republicans solution to health care, "Don't get sick and if you do die quickly" is entirely appropriate and an apt description for the effects of the current state of health insurance in America. In our company we recently were unable to change insurance companies due to one particular employee who had contracted lymphoma. As his cancer progressed more expensive treatments were required. Instead of participating in that wonderful marketplace of insurance policies and finding more affordable insurance for our employees we were forced to endure the constant premium increases as the result of that one ill employee. Certainly we couldn't change policies as he would never be covered due to pre-existing conditions. If he lives we still can't change comnpanies as the possibility of a reoccurence constitutes a pre-existing condition. When this employee tragically died our company was finally able to find other coverage to bring down the cost of health insurance to our employees. Like Grayson says, "Don't get sick and if you do die quickly".

William, at least your company had the decency to keep him onboard (presumably) until the end. The person in our case was unceremoniously let go.

Family values. Not.

Red meat in politics is nothing new, nor has it really risen dramatically this year. All that has changed is the target and Time seems uncomfortable with that. Complaining about corruption and dishonesty didn't bother during the last eight years for some unknown reason. And it's not like Minnesotans don't have a history of rewarding the red meat pundits. Look at our new senator.

After all these years, this seems to me pretty much like "been there, done that..."

The media exposure is new, probably, but the politically charged slams have been going on for at least 200 years here.

The partisan newspapers of the time did a pretty fair job of blasting any comment that would charge up the faithful back in the day. Rumors, off-hand comments, outright lies -- all were fodder then as well as now.

What changes? Not much.

Rush Limbaugh and Fox News used the most outrageous language and lies to rile up their audiences for years before the first return shot was fired in the form of Al Franken's book against Limbaugh.

Then, all of a sudden, I began to read articles in mainstream publications about "the decline of civility in public discourse."

In other words, lack of civility became a problem in the eyes of the mainstream media only after the left started fighting back. Before then, the talk radio guys and Fox News could accuse that ill-defined group known as "liberals" of every sin except cannibalism, and there were no reaction from the center.

I have long believed that right-wing media serve a distinct and insidious purpose: to take the justifiable anger of the American middle and working classes and channel it away from the people who are actually responsible for the mess this country is in (the fat cats in the military-industrial complex, the bought-off politicians who do their bidding) and toward a laundry list of scapegoats (immigrants, African-Americans, people on welfare, feminists, labor unions, teachers, environmentalists, ACORN), none of whom actually call the shots in this country.

It seems to me the raising of the civility issue had more to do with its increasing presence in both political and other discourse.

As for "distinct and insidious purpose", it always seems to me suspicious and possibly self serving when purposes are attributed by one side of an argument by the other side. Unless the One Who Can Read Hearts is doing the attributing, of course.

"attributed by one side TO the other side."

Sorry.