Skip to Content

Maureen Reed drops out, Tarryl Clark can now focus on Michele Bachmann

Dr. Maureen Reed
Dr. Maureen Reed

Less than two weeks after filing for Congress in the Sixth District as a DFL primary challenger against DFL endorsee Tarryl Clark, Dr. Maureen Reed announced over the weekend that she was dropping out.

That's good news for Clark, of course, who can now focus al her resources on November and the daunting goal of unseating U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann. But the Reed drop-out doesn't feel like a game changer. Political insiders and the commentariat consider Bachmann the favorite, but not quite a lock to win her third term representing the north Suburban Sixth Distrtict.

Reed, a physician, has been a high official in some health care organizations, chaired the U of M's Board of Regents, and was the lieutenant gov. nominee on the Indpendence Party ticket in 2008. She got into the congressional race before Clark, back when the 2008 nominee, Elwyn Tinklenberg, was still planning to run against Bachmann again.

But Clark, a state senator and member of the DFL legislative leadership, is a favorite in DFL circles. Since entering the race, she has been among the most successful congressional challengers nationally in fund-raising. (In her first quarter in the race, she raised more than any other House challenger.) Clark came in seeking the DFL endorsement and pledging to abide by it, which was easy since she seemed to have it locked up from the beginning.

Reed also sought the endorsement, but never firmly pledged to abide. When it became clear that she had no chance to be endorsed, Reed kept open the option to run in the Aug. 10 primary. On Sunday, she announced that she would drop that race. Her statement said that "I have come to the conclusion that a prolonged primary fight only assists Michele Bachmann" is obviously correct, but could have been clear before she filed papers for a primary run. More likely, it was simply becoming more obvious that Reed had no chance against Clark in the primary and that widespread conclusion surely made it harder to raise campaign funds.

As she had for months, Reed would have presented herself as a moderate, and therefore more electable in the Sixth than Clark, whose legislative record will make her easy for Republicans to caricature as a tax-and-spend, pro-choice liberal. It's not a terrible argument, but it didn't seem to be getting her anywhere (although I'm unaware of any public polling of a Clark v. Reed primary matchup).

State Sen. Tarryl Clark
State Sen. Tarryl Clark

Clark clearly was going to win the primary, but the Reed drop-out does allow Team Clark to focus sooner and more totally on identifying and courting swing voters that can help her defeat Bachmann.

In her withdrawal statement, Reed said: "I feel that it is time for the DFL to unify behind one candidate in this race," but could not quite bring herself to mention Clark by name. There have certainly been more enthusiastic shows of party unity and uniting behind the victor of an intra-party fight. The Clark campaign and DFL Chair Brian Melendez both put out press releases thanking Reed and welcoming the opportunity to focus on Bachmann.

Perhaps the best news for Clark is that, in calling for DFL unity, Reed foreclosed any concern that she would switch back to the Independence Party. The Sixth District has been one of the stronger areas for the IP. It was the heart of Jesse Ventura's big 1998 upset win, and IP candidates for Congress have run reasonably strong in the past two cycles, having received eight percent of the vote in 2006, when Bachmann was first elected, and 10 percent in 2008. Bob Anderson, who got that 10 percent, is running again this time. No one seems quite sure how much Anderson's showing had to do with this friendly name, enduring IP strength in the district or Anderson's somewhat libertarian issue positions. But the IP vote is a potential factor in the 6th.

A fourth candidate, Psychology Prof. Aubrey Immelman of College of St. Benedict/St. John’s University, also qualified for the ballot through petition signatures.

Rep. Michele Bachmann
MinnPost/Raoul Benavides
Rep. Michele Bachmann

National Republican Campaign Committee spokester Tom Erickson put out a press release saying that Republicans should be grateful for the Reed withdrawal since it ensures that Bachmann will be matched up against Clark, whom Erickson characterized as a "far outside the mainstream... unelectable, tax-and-spend liberal... [with a] penchant for backing massive job-killing tax increases and cheering on the reckless Obama agenda.” One senses that these phrases may be used again.

And, speaking of concepts you will continue to hear if you pay attention to this race, the DFL press release does not attack Bachmann for ideological extremism but characterizes her as "Minnesota’s most ineffective, absentee member of Congress who will do anything except work for the people of her district."

Congressional Quarterly and Cook Political Report rate the race "likely Republican," which means they do not consider Bachmann safe, but that she is in better shape for reelection for than those who are rated "lean Republican" and certainly not a toss-up. Rothenberg Political Report rates the 6th District as "Republican favored," which is a similar ranking.

Comments (10)

This is great news for the people of the Mn 6th District who want effective representation in the US House of Representatives.

Both Reed and Clark are well-qualified, moderate, effective-government candidates .... by Reed graciously bowing out, the race becomes one between grandstanding at the expense of legislating - if Michele Bachmann is re-elected, OR effective representation of the Mn 6th's interest by a talented and articulate member of the majority governing party - if Tarryl Clark is elected.

Perhaps the Independent Party's nominee will also see the wisdom of shutting down the spoiler campaign that it currently is, giving an even better chance for the Mn 6th to have vigorous effective representation by Tarryl Clark.

I think about this race in the context of the Gov's race. I'm assuming Emmer wins this district easily, though Horner could come in 2nd. What Clark needs is for the Horner vote to split her way, rather than going with Anderson. I suspect that's a long shot & expect similar results to 2008, with Clark getting comparable results as Tinklenberg.

Michele Bachmann twice voted against energy conservation legislation that put hundreds of Andersen Windows workers back on the job in her district.

http://dumpbachmann.blogspot.com/2010/05/michele-bachmann-votes-against....

And lately Bachmann has been trotting out Polaris Industries CEO Scott Wine as her best business buddy--the same Polaris Industries that is shutting down a plant in Osceola and shipping 800 jobs to Mexico.

http://bachmann.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=189168

http://www.polarisindustries.com/en-us/OurCompany/News/PressReleases/Pag...

Who's the job killer in this election?

While Reed dropping out is a positive, I disagree that having the Independant(s) in the race will help rid the District of Bachmann. It must be remembered that Bachmann won previously precisely because there were Independants in the race -- thus she won with less than a majority. It seems the die is cast for the same happeining this time -- much to the dismay of moderates and liberals in the district, and to the continuing embarassment of our state.

I cannot wait to read "Taxing Tarrly's" campaign literature.

Tarryl Clark has one unshakable liability that dooms her campaign, regardless of what Bachmann does or says: O B A M A.

The May jobs report of a pathetic 40,000 jobs signals a 1931 - 1932 deepening of the current economic depression.

The Obama Wall Street dominated White House deliberately excluded the wildly popular Glass Steagall Act restitution in its recent "financial reform" bill. The Obama doormat liberals Franken/Klobuchar, and by implication, Tarryl Clark, voted for this exclusion, thus sustaining a continuing Wall Street insane policy that is the root of the economic depression.

Glenn Mesaros raises an interesting point - with bad economic news, the party in power usually takes a hit.

i'd argue that such a reasonable analysis may not apply in the Mn 6th, for a couple of reasons.

Tarryl Clark was not in Congress during this period of time. Michele Bachmann was, and had her political positions prevailed -she voted against the stimulus, she voted against mortgage relief, when she bothered to vote - had her positions prevailed there would be deeper recession rather than recovery, and job numbers would be tanking instead of recovering

It's long time that conservatives cared more about governing than just the question of tax levels. Tarryl Clark gets that, Michele Bachmann doesn't

"[Reed's] statement said that "I have come to the conclusion that a prolonged primary fight only assists Michele Bachmann" is obviously correct...."

I must be pretty thick because I don't understand why that's true at all, let alone obviously so.

In Iowa, the land of MN cheerleader jokes, I was taught that contested primaries made the party stronger by keeping public interest high in a race that might otherwise vanish from the news. Contested primaries let candidates develop their chops in friendly settings, hopefully letting them get their mulligans in while they still don't count.

I know political activists from coast to coast but only in Minnesota (or when talking to DNC types) do I ever hear that uncontested primaries are a good thing.

Only in Minnesota.

[Iowa, btw, has a Democratic governor, something endorsement-driven DFLers haven't pulled off in decades.]

One of the great disappointments of moving here was to discover that Michele Bachmann was NOT appointed to office by Tim Pawlenty – something that would have made a certain kind of cynical political sense – but was actually elected by at least some of the people in her Congressional District. This has done much to damage my faith in the good sense of Minnesotans in general, and residents of the 6th District in particular.

When I lived in Colorado, I was “represented” by, first, Tom Tancredo, and later, by Marilyn Musgrave. Tancredo’s myopia has him seeing immigration as a deciding factor in virtually every issue, while Musgrave’s myopia seemed concentrated on gay marriage, to the exclusion of other national concerns. Fortunately, neither of those people are now in Congress, and by sheer chance, when I settled in the Twin Cities area, the house I bought happens to be three blocks OUTSIDE the 6th District, thus ending, at least until the next redistricting, what I was sure was some sort of curse placed on my retirement.

The best thing about this race? It’s two WOMEN fighting it out for a Congressional seat. My late mother would have been appalled by Michele Bachmann, but pleased to see that both candidates were female.

For some of us, there seems to be a silver lining here:

Doesn't this mean there will be an OPEN seat for the state senate?