
MinnPost thanks these major sponsors:
Sponsor of
Second Opinion
Sponsor of
Community Sketchbook
Our major advertisers
Our in-kind partners

MinnPost thanks these generous donors:
INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik
(See all donors here.)
By Eric Black | Published Sun, Mar 29 2009 3:29 pm
I mentioned a week ago that Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) was seriously weakened politically heading into 2010. Confirmation continues to come in. The Cook Political Report, which ranks every Senate race, updated its ranking on Friday and moved Dodd's seat two categories in the direction of more imperiled (that's a big move in these matters) from "likely Dem" to "toss-up."
Chris Cillizza, who blogs politics for the Wash Post, publishes a top 10 list of the seats most likely to change parties. On Cillizza's latest list, published Friday, Dodd's seat, which wasn't mentioned in the top 10 of the previous edition, appears as the fourth most endangered (also, a very big move for those who watch these kinds of rankings).
But the overall picture remains very bleak for the Senate GOP caucus. In fact, of the top eight seats that Cillizza rates most likely to change parties, seven are currently held by Repubs (Dodd's seat being the only exception). As you know, assuming that Al Franken will be seated before 2010, the Dems would need just one net pickup to reach the nominally filibuster-proof majority of 60.
Cook's new rankings are a little happier for Repubs, but not much. Charlie has seven seats in the toss-up category, five now held by Repubs. (If you're curious, the other Dem seat that Cook rates a toss-up is the Illinois seat held by the recently-appointed Roland Burris. But I assume that vulnerability declines considerably if, as seems likely, the Dems nominate anyone other than the Blago-tainted Burris.
And, if you didn't click through to see Cillizza's list (and his explanations) for yourself, his most vulnerable list goes thus:
I'm sure I obsess a bit much on the 2010 Senate lineup, with miles to go before the electorate weighs in. But I do think this: Repub efforts to restrain the Obama and Dem Congress from fully implementing their program will be a theme this year and next and will create some smoke about who gets credit/blame for whatever good/bad happens. If the Dems hold the White House, a big House majority and a filibuster-proof Senate majority heading into 2012, it will set up a huge referendum on how the country feels about letting one party run the government, whether the big Dem gains of 2008 were a sustainable realignment, and how long the country is going to hold Bush against the GOP.
Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.
3 Comments: Hide/Show Comments
Forgot Password? | Register to Comment
MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.
We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.