
MinnPost thanks these major sponsors:
Sponsor of
Second Opinion
Sponsor of
Community Sketchbook
Our major advertisers
Our in-kind partners

MinnPost thanks these generous donors:
INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik
(See all donors here.)
By Eric Black | Published Fri, May 22 2009 10:38 am

In his big AEI speech on national security yesterday (transcript here), former Veep Dick Cheney slammed the Obama administration for, among other things, using "euphemisms" to talk about what his administration called "the global war on terror." The Obamian doublespeakers, Cheney complained, prefer to call it "overseas contingency operations."
I gather there may be a modicum of truth here. Some administration spokesters have indeed uttered the phrase in describing the U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the term does the have the air of pettifoggery about it.
I agree with Dick Cheney. Plain-speaking is a good thing. But for the former vice president to deliver a rebuke on the topic is a fairly stunning display of chutzpah.
His was an administration that pushed through a law making it easier to wiretap phones, monitor email, access medical and financial records and deport immigrants, and decided, because of their commitment to candor, to name it "the USA Patriot Act." It's education policy was "no child left behind." The transfer of prisoners to countries that employ torture was "extraordinary rendition." The Bush policy allowing more "harvesting" of trees was dubbed the "health forest initiative."
If you have other favorite euphemisms of the Bush years, feel free to reminisce in the comment thread.
But what the heck. Cheney is out of office now and free to return to his natural penchant for plain-speaking. And, as he said Thursday:
"It's one thing to adopt the euphemisms that suggest we're no longer engaged in a war. These are just words, and in the end it's the policies that matter most."
And most of his talk was a robust defense of a policy that he advocated and still defends, a policy that authorized the use of interrogation tactics that crossed boundaries into what previous administrations, and the current administration, have considered "torture." A blunt word, that, and still being disputed by Cheney and others, but certainly no euphemism.
No, but there is a euphemism for those tactics, coined and relentlessly repeated by the Bush-Cheney administration. The euphemism, which is really a classic of the genre, is "enhanced interrogation of high-value detainees." How's that for calling a spade a spade?
The plain-speaking former veep, who is offended by euphemizing, used the term "enhanced interrogation" 12 times in his fairly short speech.
Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.
22 Comments: Hide/Show Comments
Forgot Password? | Register to Comment
MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.
We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.