SERVING MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL / MINNESOTA
Donate Now Sustaining Member

MinnPost thanks these major sponsors:




Sponsor of
Second Opinion



Our major advertisers


Our in-kind partners


MinnPost thanks these generous donors:

INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik

(See all donors here.)

ERIC BLACK INK

  • Switch to Small Text Size
  • Switch to Medium Text Size
  • Switch to Large Text Size
Email Print Submit a Comment

    Obama's Lake Wobegon approval ratings

    By By Eric Black | Published Fri, May 29 2009 3:29 pm

    I keep hearing people describe Pres. Obama as a "very popular" president. A Gallup analysis suggests that is a small exaggeration.

    Obama's average approval rating for May is 65 percent. This is fine. This is no cause for alarm. And, like all the children of Lake Wobegon, this is above average. But just barely.

    Of the last eight presidents, this ties Pres. Obama for fourth place -- with Jimmy Carter.

    Presidents Kennedy (77 percent), Eisenhower (74) and Reagan (68) had higher approval ratings in May of their first year in office. Carter tied Obama at 65. Obama comes in ahead of Presidents Nixon (63), the first Bush (60), the second Bush (55) and Clinton (45!).

    All of which tells me that it's too soon to reach any conclusions. Look at the list and think about who was reelected and who wasn't. Of course, JFK didn't live to seek a second term, but of those who did, the highest rated (Eisenhower) and the lowest rated (Clinton) were both reelected by substantial margins.

    By the way, Gallup also compared the first reactions to the nomination of Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court (47 percent rated the choice "excellent or good," 33 percent said "only fair or poor" and 20 percent had no opinion) with the first public reactions to the last three court nominees.

    Like the approval ratings of the man who chose her, Sotomayor's ratings are above average, but nothing remarkable. First reactions to Pres. Bush's nomination of John Roberts were slightly better, first reactions to Bush's nominations of Samuel Alito and the subsequently withdrawn nomination of Harriet Miers were worse. But even the disastrous Miers nomination received more excellent or good ratings (44 percent) than fair or poor (41 percent).

    Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.

    Advertisement:

    2 Comments: Hide/Show Comments

    E-mail address

    Password

     

    Forgot Password? | Register to Comment

    MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.

    We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.


    Eric Black

    Eric Black Ink

    minnpost.com/ericblack


    Eric Black is a former reporter for the Star Tribune and Twin Cities blogger. He writes about politics and government of Minnesota and the United States, the historical background of topics and other issues. Click here to view Eric's previous postings at former blog, Eric Black Ink. He can be reached at eblack [at] minnpost [dot] com.

    Recent Posts by Eric Black