
MinnPost thanks these major sponsors:
Sponsor of
Second Opinion
Sponsor of
Community Sketchbook
Our major advertisers
Our in-kind partners

MinnPost thanks these generous donors:
INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik
(See all donors here.)
By Eric Black | Published Mon, Feb 8 2010 9:47 am
The headline above is a shameless come-on. So far, former Gov. Sarah Palin enters history mostly as the first Alaskan and only the second woman ever on the presidential ticket of major party. Her ultimate place in history will be determined by where she goes from her current spot as the darling of the Tea Party movement and potential candidate for president in 2012. Her recent statements on Fox News certainly left the door wide open to a presidential candidacy, and given the fact that she has assembled the bones of a campaign staff and is doing at least one of the main things that pre-presidential candidates do (running around the country giving speeches), she should probably considered a candidate, although at a less certain stage of candidateness than our Guv, Tim Pawlenty.
The place in history gag is this: Over recent history, almost every single vice presidential nominee from the losing ticket in the previous election has run for or seriously explored running for president in the next cycle. It's almost automatic. Being number two on the ticket makes you famous and almost inevitably apparently, makes you think that if you had been number one, you could really have done something.
So I made a little list and here's the bottom line: In the last 10 presidential cycles, the losing running mate from the previous cycle has announced a presidential candidacy in the next cycle six times. Of the four who didn't get as far as announcing, three engaged in serious explorations of running (and one of them ran the next time around). Only one of the 10, Geraldine Ferraro, never gave a presidential candidacy much consideration, and that could be that before the next cycle, her husband had been indicted (although Ferraro did make a subsequent bid for the U.S. Senate). I'll recap the list below.
In short, it is not at all remarkable that Palin is thinking about running and would be far more remarkable if she wasn't.
On the other hand, history does not suggest that the route to the presidency -- nor even to the nomination -- runs through the second spot on the previous losing ticket. Only one of the previous 10 actually was nominated in the net cycle. Another of them was nominated in a later cycle. And only one of the 44 presidents had previous experience as running mate on a losing ticket.
Triple trivia question alert
That case, makes an excellent question for political history trivia buffs. In fact, before I divulge all below, feel free to test yourself against these questions.
Okay, the list of the last 10 VPCLTs (which includes the answers to two of the three questions, so don't peek if you want full credit).
Oh yeah: Trivia question #3. A fact that escapes the memory of many trivia buffs. In 1920, Republican nominee Warren G. Harding won what was, by some measures, the biggst landslide in presidential history over the hapless Dem nominee, Ohio Gov. James Middleton Cox. Cox's running (and therefore an official VPCLT) was an affable, and still ambulatory, assistant secretary of the Navy named Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.
13 Comments: Hide/Show Comments
Forgot Password? | Register to Comment
MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.
We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.