SERVING MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL / MINNESOTA
Donate Now Sustaining Member

MinnPost thanks these major sponsors:




Sponsor of
Second Opinion



Our major advertisers


Our in-kind partners


MinnPost thanks these generous donors:

INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik

(See all donors here.)

ERIC BLACK INK

  • Switch to Small Text Size
  • Switch to Medium Text Size
  • Switch to Large Text Size
Email Print Submit a Comment

    Investors target Target over Emmer donations

    By Eric Black | Published Fri, Aug 20 2010 5:55 am

    Target Corp. continues to deal with headaches over its financial support for the Tom Emmer for Governor campaign. My buddy Tom Hamburger of the L.A. Times breaks has the latest scooplet in the Friday editions, reporting that several institutional investors -- which together hold more than $50 million worth of Target shares -- are sponsoring a shareholders' resolution asking for a review of the policy for making political contributions to avoid future problems.

    Target's CEO GreggSteinhafel has already called for a review of the policy, but, perhaps since Steinhafel was responsible for the donation that caused all the trouble, the investors are asking for a review by Steinhafel's bosses -- the Board of Directors.

    A correction and an addendum: This post originally said that the investors who are demanding the review owned more than 50 million shares of Target. My mistake. Should have said 50 million shares. Thanks to commenter Joseph Skar for pointing out the error which is now corrected above.

    Also, MinnPost teammate David Brauer notes that the investor groups demanding this review are all in the category of "socially responsible investors" that incorporate human rights, diversity, environmental and other moral stands into their investment decisions. Brauer suggests -- as neither my post, the Strib story, nor the L.A. Times story that the Strib and I followed note -- that the reaction to the Target-Emmer kerfuffle by socialy responsible funds may not be a reliable guide to the reaction of other investors who are just trying to maximize return.

    Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.

    Advertisement:

    8 Comments: Hide/Show Comments

    E-mail address

    Password

     

    Forgot Password? | Register to Comment

    MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.

    We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.


    Eric Black

    Eric Black Ink

    minnpost.com/ericblack


    Eric Black is a former reporter for the Star Tribune and Twin Cities blogger. He writes about politics and government of Minnesota and the United States, the historical background of topics and other issues. Click here to view Eric's previous postings at former blog, Eric Black Ink. He can be reached at eblack [at] minnpost [dot] com.

    Recent Posts by Eric Black