Gays, critics shoot at Target
What’s that Third Law of Physics again? The “opposite and equal reaction” thing? Target Corp. continues to feel it after word of its $150,000 donation to Tom Emmer’s campaign, via the new pro-business PAC MN Forward, came to light and blowback ignited in the gay community. Jason Hoppin’s PiPress story this morning says: “The controversy is particularly difficult for Target, which has cultivated an inclusive image. Its company policies and benefits for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered workers are among the best in the business, earning a perfect 100 percent score from the Human Rights Campaign. ‘Certainly the fact that they have donated to this committee is very troubling,’ Human Rights Campaign spokesman Michael Cole said. ... While there is no evidence the donation is affecting sales, there are risks to Target's bottom line. It has been expanding locations in urban centers, which typically vote Democratic and are more receptive to gay-friendly policies. In recent years, Target has opened stores in New York, Washington, D.C., and Chicago, and is seeking approval for a San Francisco store.”
MinnPost’s Joe Kimball posted Target CEO Greg Steinhafel’s e-mail to employees.
In a post titled “Target's tea bag-loving CEO lands company in hot water,” City Pages’ Hart van Denburg notes CEO Steinhafel (and wife’s) fondness for Michele Bachmann and all things Republican, and writes: “Target's public face on all of this has been to attribute its politics to support of business-friendly politicians. And Steinhafel's isn't apologizing in a recent letter to employees upset about their company's anti-gay politics. He reminded them of Target's support for GLBT-friendly policies, organizations and events — all of which run counter to the big money he and the company are putting behind anti-gay and pro-Tea Party candidates.There is just one sign, however, that Steinhafel recognizes Emmer's name is becoming PR toxic: He never mentioned Emmer's name once in the letter.”
NPR’s “Political Junkie” blog mentions Tuesday's Senate move to block consideration of the DISCLOSE bill, which would require those receiving corporate contributions, as MN Forward did, to tell everyone who put money in. “Larry Norton, a former counsel to the Federal Election Commission, says American business seems to be in wait-and-see mode — for now. [But when they decide to spend], he says, there's going to be one question asked over & over: ‘If we make this contribution to you, are you going to have to disclose that we gave it to you?’ Right now, with an ad like the one from Minnesota Forward, the answer is ‘probably.’ The company's name probably would be disclosed. Under the DISCLOSE bill, Norton says, the answer would have been a definite ‘yes.’ " If, of course, they get DISCLOSE past the inevitable GOP filibuster.
Finally, the issue is all over the blogs. For example, Autostraddle, a blog devoted to “News, Politics, Entertainment and Girl on Girl Culture,” writes: “Money trumps human rights, pretty much every time. Obviously, the key to world domination is to make ‘doing the right thing’ compatible with making money. If all gay people stop shopping at Target over this issue, then supporting Emmer no longer promotes their business interest. Vote with your dollars, as they say. While I’m willing to bet a boycott of Target will go over about as well as a boycott of American Apparel, it’s worth a shot.” As actions go, $150K is nothing to Target, but I think by the time this plays out they’ll have felt all that and more.
“All cash” is Bloomberg News’ description of the $1.5 billion deal UnitedHealth is working on to acquire Pennsylvania-based, Executive Health Resources Inc. Says the Bloomberg story: “Executive Health, founded in 1997 by Chief Executive Robert Corrato and backed by Abry Partners, provides hospitals with teams of outside physician advisers to improve regulatory compliance and efficiency. ‘Strategically, it makes sense for United,’ Collins Stewart analyst Brian Wright said. Facing declining profit growth in its core insurance business, ‘they've got to look outside those areas to produce meaningful growth.’ " A spokesman for UnitedHealth declined to comment. The story adds: “UnitedHealth generated $357 million in earnings from operations from its health services units in this year's second quarter, about 20 percent of its total operating profit, Hemsley said on the company's conference call. He said he wants to double that percentage in the coming years.’ ” Anyone want to bet against him?
Hey, according to the Strib’s Jim Buchta, we’re not Las Vegas, Miami or Phoenix. He writes: “From April to May the median sale price of all home sales in the Twin Cities rose from $169,800 to $175,000 — a 3.1 percent increase, according to data compiled by the Minneapolis Area Association of Realtors for the Twin Cities metro area. From May to June, the latest local data that's available, sale prices rose 4 percent.” That, is the best in the nation and waaaaaay ahead of those Sun Belt paradises we had to read so much about before the crash. He adds: “Nationwide 15 of the 20 metro areas in the Case-Shiller report showed year-over-year improvement in the annual comparison. Las Vegas led the decliners at minus 6.5 percent. In the month-to-month comparison, 19 of the 20 regions showed an increase. Beleaguered Las Vegas fell 0.5 percent.”
Did you catch the PiPress editorial arguing for a trial on climate change? This, in the wake of that juicy flare-up between St. Thomas prof John Abraham and “global warming denier” Lord Alexander Monckton of Britain. The editorial says: “We proposed this back in February, on a day when there were icy flurries outside our seventh-floor aerie. We come back to it today, as heat and humidity are mounting, as a way of isolating and publicizing the main points of contention, in a calm, deliberative, courtroom-like setting. We propose allowing citizens to reach verdicts that will not stop the shouting but which will be a step forward for rational debate. Which this issue desperately needs.” As theater goes, the idea might be fun. But since the denier crowd seizes on quite literally anything said by anyone (who isn’t Al Gore) as opposite and equal “refudiation,” a rational debate isn’t going to settle anything. Maybe if papers stopped reporting on science-free deniers as though they had an opposite and equal view?
MPR’s Tim Nelson files a short report on an independent prosecutor declining to pursue charges against Ramsey County Sheriff Bob Fletcher for his use of mailing list data. Writes Nelson: “Fletcher sent a mailing for a charity event to holders of concealed-carry gun permits late last year. A state review of the mailing found he had violated the law governing use of information on permit holders, which is tightly controlled.” But the prosecutor says he couldn’t make the case ...
Interesting “investigation” piece by Fox9’s Jeff Ballion on deer collisions on metro roadways. One takeaway stat: Of 24 deaths from vehicles hitting Bambi, 20 were motorcyclists.
As make-work projects go, arson is always a little problematic. Dan Holtz of the Eau Claire Leader-Telegram writes of the volunteer fireman who hired a kid to start grass fires so he could pick up a little extra cash putting them out. “Augusta-Bridge Creek firefighters responded to three suspicious fires in April in the town of Bridge Creek: an April 13 grass fire at E19595 Dolotta Road, an April 18 grass fire in a ditch and an April 21 fire at a pine tree plantation ... . Yule [the 18-year-old] told deputies he started the fire on Dolotta Road after pouring gas on a tree. He then reported the fire to authorities. Yule said he started the [next] fire ... by using a roman candle, a type of firework. The [last] fire, he said, was started by a torch using gas and lamp oil. In each instance, Yule said, he was with [the fireman, Joseph] Thalacker and [an accomplice]. When asked why he started the fires, Yule said Thalacker wanted to make extra money by responding to the fires. {The accomplice] told deputies Thalacker was the ‘getaway driver’ after the fires were started.” Thalacker made $8 an hour as a fireman and will now being paying $10,000 in restitution and fines.
Hoooo, boy. Someone needed anger management therapy and other forms of heavy-duty counseling before things got as out of control as they did. James Walsh’s Strib story about a Blaine guy out for revenge is a disturbing read: “A day after moving into their Blaine home, a young family's 4-year-old son wandered into a neighbor's yard to play. The boy's mother said she saw the neighbor pick up her son and tell the little boy, ‘Bet you can't touch me.’ The mother, aghast, tried calling the boy, but the neighbor held him. Before finally setting him down, he allegedly kissed the boy on the lips. On Aug. 3, 2008, the boy's parents reported the incident to Blaine police, who questioned the neighbor, Barry Ardolf. Six months later, according to court documents and police reports filed by the family, Ardolf allegedly began exacting revenge.” Among his moves was “... a bogus e-mail account in the neighbor's name, and hijacking the neighbor's wireless, [Ardolf] began sending a series of e-mails containing child pornography and lewd messages to the neighbor's boss and co-workers. Eventually, Ardolf even allegedly sent threats to elected officials — including Vice President Joe Biden — again, in the name of the neighbor.”
More like this
- Meet Randi Reitan, the woman who's taking on Target over its controversial donation to MN Forward
- In the bull's-eye: How Target -- and Minnesota -- landed at ground zero of an expensive U.S. debate
- In the bull's-eye, Part 2: Despite Target apology, San Francisco stores stand on shaky political ground
- Rybak: Target CEO gave to my guv campaign before Emmer's
- Vote stats show Dayton ran poorly in key metro cities
Recent Stories
Most Commented
-
30 comments
-
27 comments
-
26 comments
-
23 comments
-
22 comments
Comments (24)
Whoa, there, Bri.
The Bullseye is well within it's corporate rights to donate to any and all PACs.
To speculate on / call out CEO Steinhafel's (and even his wife's - !)personal politics is a rather disturbing tactic. It's OK when a CEO like Vance Opperman's company gushes money into liberal coffers though, right?
Why don't you let it be that Target earns a 100% rating for the GLBTs "rights" via their corporate HR?
Almost as disturbing as painting Emmer an "anti-gay" candidate when he is quite simply and openly anti-same sex marriage (as are the majority of Minnesotans, natch).
Mucho difference, amigo.
Try to get your blatant hypocrisies in order, my man.
I relish the prospect of putting global warming on trial.
Gads, the spectacle of watching warmers trying to prove they've met any level of scientific rigor under the strict confines of a courtroom setting would be a delight to savor in these dark days.
Of course it will never happen.
So much simpler to declare an unsupported, unilateral conclusion and send forth flocks of the simple minded to carry the message.
I don't think anyone ever said Target isn't within its rights to donate as they do, nor its CEO. I just think it is regarded as extraordinarily stupid of them to do so. They could become the new Dominoes.
Oh, and speaking of spectacles; does anyone know of the Targeteers planning any protests?
The sight of Target's coddled "sand is food" employees dropping their aprons and taking up wack-a-loop signs in front of their own places of employment would be tre sweet....appropos of nothing (which is the correct form), I'd show up with $20.00 in pennies to toss around and wait for Anderson Cooper to come interview me.
BD sez: "Almost as disturbing as painting Emmer an "anti-gay" candidate when he is quite simply and openly anti-same sex marriage (as are the majority of Minnesotans, natch).
Yeah, why would you want to paint as an "anti-gay candidate" a fine man like Tom Emmer, who donates to and vigorously supports an organization that says countries that execute gays are more moral than the U.S. That would be Bradlee Dean's You Can Run But You Cannot Hide cult in Annandale. Dean has some choice words for Jews too.
These are "good people," says Emmer. I'm sure the majority of Minnesotans would agree with Emmer and get behind the idea of executing gays, natch.
Read all about Emmer's close ties to these "good people" here, since no one else covering the Emmer-Target flap, including MinnPost, seems interested in touching it.
http://tinyurl.com/Emmer-Dean-Kill-Gays
BD, you forgot to end your post with "We're MN Forward and we approved this message"
If anything, I'm disgusted with the fact that the Media's focused solely on the gay issue to contrast Target's public vs. private face. Put Emmer's platform side by side with the Target Foundations list of grants and donations. The contradictions are endless.
And I don't think the Oppermans' have ever tried to hide their "liberalness" behind a smokescreen. When the Steinhafels come out publicly behind Bachmann, maybe then you'll have a valid point.
Time to beat the Tom Emmer / Target Corporation / Tea Party / Michelle Bachmann extreme right-wing wingnut campaign. The best way to do this is to not shop at Target stores. Target will keep claiming their ultra right wing politics is not affecting their sales, but I think there are enough of us out there who care about the United States to make a difference. Say no To Greg Steinhafel, his wife, and their vicious politics.
The essential tenets of global climate change science are uncontested by every scientific body of national or international standing. Given this, if the court system works, such a trial would be nothing to fear for "warmers" (er, "scientists", that is) but would be wholly necessary if those who find reality to be ideologically inconvenient did not waste all of our time politicizing science.
I am a 40-year Target shopper. If this continues I will drop them without delay, and with very little regret. Steinhafel's arrogance and disregard for the carefully crafted progressive policies of his company is breathtaking. Target's stockholders have to be wondering if he should be the person leading their company during these turbulent times.
BD, since when has any side of a debate had any problem pointing out the political activities of anyone they disagree with? It's not uncommon at all, both sides do it, You just did it regarding Opperman. Why is it a disturbing tatic? And if it is, why do you turn around and do it yourself?It's just the way of the world. If you don't like TCF having a liberal as a top manager, let them know, maybe it will change his behavior. Since you're commenting here, it seems like you don't have a problem with informtion flowing around. I don't get it.
The "essential tenets" of global climate change, Jeff?
Do you understand the meaning of the word "tenents", Jeff?
Science deals with verifiable facts and supported data, Jeff, not doctrine.
See, this is exactly what I'm talking about. This issue has been ripped from the hands of those who might have an ice-cubes chance in hell of discovering usable information and blown out into the wind for the uninformed, papspewing mob to bloviate about.
Thanks for the input though. Really.
If we would simply place a constitutional ban on money from any PAC, corporation or non-local citizen being spent for or against any candidate for any office, it would eliminate a lot of the problem. Target employees and shareholders who live in MN already can contribute their legal amount to their candidate and are allowed one vote per person. Allowing corporations, PACs (Unions included) or outside citizents to donate or spend additional money on behalf or against any candidate denies each voting citizen their equal representation. It is just a way for people to avoid campaign finance laws that are meant to keep campaigns and candidates from being beholden to a particular group or organization. The ultimate would be to simply give any qualified candidate a set amount of money and air-time. Imagine the money and power that the Democratic and Republican parties would lose if that were to happen. We might actually get candidates running on their merits who have wide appeal to the masses instead of partisan politicians running for the sake of the Party and it's fundraising agenda...
Lambert's tiresome anti-corporation, liberal knee-jerk eat the rich attack methodology called out Target's CE0 and his wife for their (possible) personal political leanings, as some sort of evidence of evil intent regarding the company's PAC donation.
He's getting called on it.
It's like saying Emmer wants gays killed because he supports a ministry that advocates for the bible.
"Do you understand the meaning of the word "tenets", Jeff?"
Well, according to Google dictionary
"The tenets of a theory or belief are the main principles on which it is based"
For the operative word "or" I'm not choosing belief but instead "theory" - in the scientific sense, which I'm sure you're willfully ignorant of, and in this case principles are the data, which I guess if you want to be bull-headed about it is a slightly inaccurate use of the word.
In any case, your attempt at obfuscation does nothing to refute the clear and unambiguous statements made by the organizations in question.
Steinhafel's entitled to donate to whomever he pleases. Target shareholders shouldn't take the heat for that. Shareholders may, however, want to let him and others in management know what (and who) they want their money to support. It will be interesting to see how this plays out over time, particularly when institutional investors enter the discussion. (Have we heard from union retirement funds yet?)
I'm all for a climate change 'trial' and am waiting for the PP to put up the first $ to conduct it, along with other news orgs.
BD, you're up to your neck in Tea Party KoolAid.
What Lambert did was link the connection between a CEO's politics and a donation led by the company he runs. The point was the hypocrisy between that donation and Target's marketing image.
You really reveal your true colors by stating Bradlee Dean's group is a "ministry advocating for the bible". Sorry, that's the role of your garden-variety church. If you think that's what Dean's running, you pal, are a lost cause.
The KMart store closest to where I live (within a few blocks of the closest Target) has been substantially cleaned up, restocked, and it's stock upgraded so that it's now virtually indistinguishable from Target. Prices are comparable. It will be very easy for me to avoid the red bullseye, which I will do until an equal donation is made to more progressive politicians.
Although I admire many of the Target Foundation's grants and Target's personnel policies, this huge donation to an organization which supports only the kinds of candidates who would like to turn back the clock and severely restrict if not wipe out the gains GLBT people have made over the past few decades runs the risk of negating all the good the Target foundation does and all Target's enlightened personnel policies.
At least for me, those are the reasons the donation to MNForward trumps all the good things Target has been doing in the recent past and leads me to ignore Target's existence until something is done to remedy the situation on their part.
I believe this donation is costing Target sales. Yesterday my daughter wanted to go shopping for camp supplies at Target. We talked about the Target contribution to Emmer's campaign (and what Emmer stands for, such as resolving Minnesota's economic woes by reducing the minimum wage for waitresses and his anti gay marriage stance) and we decide to shop at CVS in stead. $150 dollar in Target sales lost. I expect I am not the only one. Not buying from a store is really the only thing a consumer can do to show displeasure about the store's activities.
BD, Why is it an anti-corporate, knee-jerk methodology for Brian Lambert to point out that some folks in the gay community have reacted angrily to Target's donation to MN Forward. For all of us, our actions have consequences. I really don't believe that Tom Emmer wants gays killed, but it would improve my opinion of him if he would denounce the people in Africa who favor making being gay a capital offence, and denounce as well anyone here at home who supports such a group. That is what this story boils down to isn't it? It's not because of opposition of anyone advocating for the Bible.
B.T.W. I think that the Eat the Rich thing was just a joke and that if anyone out there wants to eat them, it's just a very small minority.
I've never understood single-issue voters or people but they have their right to their opinions. If it means that the checkout lines at Target, Best Buy, and other Minnesota companies are shorter, so be it. Have MAK, Dayton, and Entenza joined the boycotts too or are they still concerned about jobs, jobs, jobs?
The Target episode should remind businesses that can now make campaign contributions from corporate accounts that they run the risk of alienating customers or irritating shareholders. Or both.
Greg (#17):
To compensate for the loss of your business, I may need to fore-go the blue-light specials at my K-Mart, and do my family shopping at Target.
K-Mart is owned by Sears Holdings Corporation, which gave $326,500 to federal candidates in the 2006 election cycle through its political action committee - 37% to Democrats and 63% to Republicans. I am sure K-Mart will be happy to see you.
Ben (#18)
So what is CVS doing with the profit from your purchases? Hard to say.
Excerpts from Political Accountability:
“CVS Caremark has been an active political spender over the past decade. The company has contributed approximately $1.2 million in corporate funds to political activities since 2002. The true figure is difficult to determine because reporting at the state-level is incomplete and can be misleading.” … “CVS Caremark does not publicly disclose its political contributions …”
http://www.politicalaccountability.net/index.php?ht=a/GetDocumentAction/...
I, for one, prefer to eat the rich. They are soft and tender.
Have you ever tried to eat the poor? Ugh. Tough, stringy, and gamey.
Give me the tender flesh of the rich any day!