Skip to Content

Wow: GOP leader says he 'hates' Gaiman; author responds

AFTERNOON EDITION

Even by the score-settling and petty enemy-debasing standards of the average state Legislature, this is a little weird. First, Mike Kaszuba of the Strib covers the latest GOP move to re-direct Legacy Amendment funding ... away from those considered unhelpful: “House Republicans are reexamining state funding for some key arts and cultural heritage groups — a move that may take political aim at Minnesota Public Radio, the Minnesota Zoo and other entities that have gotten special appropriations. In an unusual move on Tuesday, Rep. Dean Urdahl, who chairs the House Legacy Funding Division panel, introduced a new version of a Legacy amendment funding bill that would remove specific money recommendations for the state's influential public radio network and other cultural organizations and said they would instead compete for grants. Urdahl, who struggled at times during a hearing to explain the sudden move, said it was partly the suggestion of Republican legislative leaders.”


Kaszuba’s story also includes this classic : “House Majority Leader Matt Dean said he reminded Urdahl of the "importance of making sure he has [Republican] caucus support" for Legacy funding for arts and cultural heritage projects, an area of spending that Dean acknowledged had rankled some Republicans. ‘MPR, it's safe to say, has been a concern in the past,’ said Dean. Dean also singled out a $45,000 payment of Legacy money that was made last year to science fiction writer Neil Gaiman for a four-hour speaking appearance. Dean said that Gaiman, ‘who I hate,’ was a ‘pencil-necked little weasel who stole $45,000 from the state of Minnesota.' "

Since it’s not every day you hear that you, a private citizen, are “hated” by some politician, much less described as “pencil necked,” Gaiman, not exactly defenseless when it comes to verbiage, has been firing back. Laurie Hertzel of the Strib reports: “Wow.  I'm speechless.  But Gaiman isn't. He's been Tweeting all morning ... On Twitter, Gaiman fired back. ‘Sad &  funny. Minnesota Republicans have a 'hate' list. Like Nixon did. I'm on it,’ he posted this morning, followed by, ‘It's strange watching a grownup high school bully in power. But the bully vocabulary remains the same.’ A few minutes later, ‘Any nice, sane Minnesota Republicans reading this, please vote for someone who isn't a bully with a hate list next time.’ And, a few minutes after that, ‘Bizarrely, the twit who called me a pencilnecked weasel has posted my blog on his and claims copyright on it.’ Gaiman then posted a link to Dean's blog, which very quickly crashed. Gaiman tweeted one more time to apologize.” As usual, I’m not certain where the jobs-generating benefit is in this one.

The high-profile national lefty blog Firedoglake gets in on the action, with a post saying: “What is your major malfunction, Matt Dean? I mean, really? Are cheap shots wrapped in non sequiturs your strong suit, or what? Are you jealous that Gaiman’s fantasy writings are much better than our party’s fantasy writings — such as that pathetic excuse for a budget bill your party had Accenture write?  And for this they put you in charge of the House? And as for your partners in crime at the StarTribune, who are trying to stick up the state’s taxpayers for $791 million for a new Vikings stadium (that works out to 17,577.77 four-hour appearances by Neil Gaiman, or 17,250.77 more appearances than the Vikings will make in that stadium during its likely thirty-year lifespan), they should be ashamed of themselves for their hypocrisy as well as their facilitating your idiocy. What’s next, attacking Terry Pratchett?”

Exciting morning in St. Paul, and I’m not talking about the Capitol. As the PiPress tells it: “Just after 9 a.m., a Route 94 bus was traveling through the intersection at Cedar and Sixth streets. A black Chevrolet Silverado went through a red light and hit the bus, [Metro Transit spokesman John] Siqveland said. The bus and the truck went onto the sidewalk, and at least the bus struck the side of the Alliance Bank Center, Siqveland said. The truck driver was trapped in his vehicle, he said. ‘It was a tangled mess there on the sidewalk,’ Siqveland said. ‘It was a pretty dramatic scene.’ Seven people on the bus, including a baby and the driver, were taken to the hospital, Siqveland said. Four people were in the pick-up truck and two of them went to the hospital, he said. All the injured were conscious and breathing at the scene.”

It’ll be a relief not to hear anything more about this story. The ex-nurse in Faibault convicted in those creepy online assisted suicides has been handed a 360-day sentence. Randy Furst of the Strib writes: “[William] Melchert-Dinkel was found guilty on March 15 by Rice County District Judge Thomas Neuville, who concluded that the defendant had ‘intentionally advised and encouraged’ Mark Drybrough, 32, of Coventry, England, and Kajouji, 18, of Ottawa, Ont., to commit suicide. Under the unusual terms of the sentence, Melchert-Dinkel would serve 160 days in jail for the death of each victim and an additional two days a year for each death for the next 10 years; those two-day periods would be served in the month in which each person died. Melchert-Dinkel also was placed on probation for 15 years and ordered to have no contact with the victims' families or access to the Internet except in connection with work, and that must be approved by a probation officer. He also is prohibited from having any contact with vulnerable adults.”

MPR’s PoliGraph blogger Catharine Richert gives low credence to GOP 8th District Congressman Chip Cravaack’s recent assertion about Paul Ryan's big Medicare reform plan. She writes: “U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan's budget proposal includes a big change to Medicare. Most notably, the Republican chairman of the House Budget Committee aims to convert the program into a system that offers what he calls "premium support," which his detractors call vouchers. Among those defending Ryan's proposal is Rep. Chip Cravaack of Minnesota. ‘The [new Medicare] benefits being proposed is what I receive in Congress right now,’ Cravaack assured listeners of April 14, 2011, ‘Midmorning’ broadcast. ... The Verdict ... There's a nugget of truth in Cravaack's claim: the Republican plan envisions that Medicare and federal employee benefits would have to meet standards set by the same branch of government, and that both groups would get to choose from an array of private plans. But Cravaack's statement that the GOP Medicare proposal is 'what I receive in Congress right now’ is misleading to the point of being false because the government is guaranteed to cover 75 percent of his premium costs, regardless of how expensive health care gets. That's not the case for the new Medicare plan proposed by the GOP; in fact, it is likely beneficiaries will end up paying far more than they do now.” But ... but ... what if the word “same” doesn’t mean the same to Mr. Cravaack as it does to you and me?

Our guy T-Paw had better do well in Thursday’s big GOP presidential contenders debate in South Carolina ... since he may be the only one there. Reuters is saying: “In the latest evidence of the sputtering start to the 2012 White House race, Republicans will hold their first candidate debate on Thursday with a depleted line-up without the party's most high-profile contenders. The nationally televised debate in South Carolina will feature only one top-tier candidate, former Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty, and four lesser-known contenders for the right to challenge President Barack Obama next year. Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, who has formed a committee to raise money and explore a possible run, is skipping the event. Four other potential candidates who score well in early opinion polls — Sarah Palin, Mike Huckabee, Donald Trump and Newt Gingrich — have made no move to run. The debate's co-sponsors, Fox News and the South Carolina Republican Party, decided to go forward despite the no-shows.” Obviously, it can’t be a first-class event unless Trump is there. "Joining Pawlenty at the debate will be Representative Ron Paul, former Senator Rick Santorum, former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson and former Godfather's Pizza executive Herman Cain."

If you’ve been out on St. Alban’s Bay in Lake Minnetonka, you’ve seen the house. I mean it’s on its own island! Jim Buchta of the Strib notes that the place poses a bit of a mystery: “The house is basically on a private island connected to the main land by bridge in St. Alban's Bay with almost 1,200 feet of shoreline. The house has nearly 19,000 square feet and there's a 15-car subterranean garage. There's a catch: The house is unfinished, it's corporate-owned and is being sold as-is, so you'll have to finish it yourself.” Did I mention that $5.9 million asking price? Oh, and the comments are pretty good. Like the one that says, “I've heard a lot of stories about that house. That it was a rich divorced couple and the woman spent all of her portion on it. That the little bridge that they built to get to the ‘island’ cost tens of thousands of dollars. Bunch of old wives tales ... I would be curious to know the truth.”

Sam Black of the Business Journal covered the formal curtain-raising on the Block E Casino concept. He writes: “The downtown Minneapolis casino project proposed by Alatus LLC is a one-time opportunity for the Minnesota state Legislature, according to Alatus Principal Bob Lux. If the proposal isn't approved this session, Alatus plans to start working on another plan for the property, Lux said in an interview after Wednesday mornings press conference. ... The bill calls for the state to own and run the casino. It's unclear what role Alatus will play when the project is complete, besides owning and operating boutique retail on the site, Lux said. Alatus would control and be able to lease out between 20,000 and 40,000 square feet of restaurant and retail space in the first phase. Lux said the second phase hasn't been ‘programmed’ yet so he didn't have a number of square feet to share.”

Comments (14)

"Wow" is right. A science fiction writer got $45,000 in taxpayer money for four hours work? Who made the decision to pay that much? I never heard of the guy. Is Neil Gaiman really that good?

Hmmm."Wow" is right. A science fiction writer gets $45,000 in taxpayer money for 4 hours' work. Rosalind might want to read a little more widely.

On the other hand, $791 million, assuming the Vikings at least make the playoffs every year, and average 11 home games every year for the 30-year life of the typical stadium, and further assuming that taxpayers get stuck with paying for 1/3 of the stadium's construction cost, the result is that every 3-hour+/- Vikings game during the stadium's life will be costing taxpayers about $2,400,000.

Are the Vikings really that good?

But seriously, shouldn't it be "whom I hate?"

I'm here all week.

Yes, Rosalind, that many times honored, internationally famous author and film maker was paid $45,000 for an appearance in Stillwater. The taxpayers you speak of pushed and passed the Legacy Amendment so that Minnesota would continue to provide arts and cultural experiences that enrich our lives and broaden our worldview. You're not interested? Thought so. Not surprised.

BTW, when he got the money he donated it to charity, unlike, say, Saint Reagan, who collected a minimum of $100,000 per speech on the rubber chicken circuit--to say nothing of the other has-been wingnuts who money-grub by appearing before similar adoring fans anywhere/anytime as long as they get paid.

Yes, he is that good. Read a book sometime. You might even enjoy it.

Re Matt Dean, if you haven't met him in person, I urge you to do so, as I have. You'll find that he's not nearly as small as his words and actions would lead you to believe. His take on Neil Gaiman confirms an observation of mine years ago that if you want a really, really good hater, you need look no further than a right wing republican. They've got that end of things locked up tighter than a drum.

I wonder if he'll apologize, like Democrats do when they speak out of turn. Remember when Tom Rukovina called the state auditor "Osama bin Awada?" She deserved it, of course, but he apologized several hours later. Will Dean do the same? Don't hold your breath. He's a republican, after all. Principles, and all that, y'know....

Re Urdahl...aghhh...to say this is not the brightest bulb on the Christmas tree is to risk utter humiliation by having everybody in earshot retorting (....wait for it...) "NO Sh*T?????".

Remember a few years ago when the legislature wanted to raise taxes to fix highways, TP vetoed it, and the legislature
overrode his veto? Who voted with TP, even though his district had miles and miles of highways that threatened front end damage to anyone who drove on them and whose constituents were screaming for help? You guessed it. Although, it's hard to feel sorry for voters who keep sending this halfwit to St Paul.

Wingnuts. Life would be so dull without them. Although I must say I'd like to give it a try.

//The author, who lives in Wisconsin, says he gave the money he received for speaking at the Stillwater library to charity.//

Apparently Rep. Urdahl was not aware of "the rest of the story" as Paul Harvey used to say......

Yes, Rosalind, he is that good. He wrote Sandman, Stardust, and Coraline to name a few, and has lived in Minnesota or Wisconsin for most of the past two decades. If you do more research than Rep. Dean did, you'd also find that Gaiman gave the money to charity, and because it was money from the Legacy Amendment, Stillwater had to spend the money or lose it and was not allowed to use it on purchasing books or computers. The charity Gaiman gave the money to used it to buy books and library equipment. This was all covered last year when Gaiman gave the speech.

If you should be upset about anything besides our "leaders" calling private individuals names and putting them on an enemies list, it should be about using the State's constitution to do budgeting that could have been done as a law. Had Stillwater been able to spend the funds on something else, they would have done it, but their hands were tied. So avoid this in the future and vote no on all upcoming amendments, because it's really hard to change your mind later, as we're seeing now with the Legacy amendment, which I voted against simply because it could have been passed as a law instead of a constitutional amendment.

The irony in the Neil Gaiman speaking engagement Republican attack is over the big top in their elephants on parade circus. This is the same crowd who wants to give the richest of the rich even more tax breaks and now they are trying to defend the average guy. Wow ! It's hilarious. You couldn't make this up.This Dean fellow is now like his political bedfellow being Trumped.

Where can I sign up to make $45K for four hours of work and have it paid out of the Legacy Fund?

That's the point, which got lost in the stupid rhetoric.

Do you think the voters were agreeing to pay $45K for a speaker with their Legacy fund dollars?

No way.

And this does speak volumes about how loosy goosy the Legacy money is being used.

Gaiman has a large and dedicated following, after winning many awards and having several projects turned into films. He set his speaking price high to discourage less serious parties, then donates 100% of his fee to charities, including abuse shelters and library funding.

"Where can I sign up to make $45K for four hours of work and have it paid out of the Legacy Fund?" - Madeline Anderson

Um, you don't get to "sign up," any more than Gaiman did. If you really want that kind of thing, be a gifted individual who works hard at his craft and produces books and other media that enrich people's lives. Develop an international following whose loyalty is deep and growing. Come to the attention of people who believe you have something significant to contribute to your community. Be sure to donate your speaking fees to charitable institutions and causes that enrich and broaden those communities. Caution: you personally will not financially benefit from this.

This was not "lost in the stupid rhetoric." You just missed it. Do a little research.

Oh, and good luck.

@Will Lynoff - I agree with you about meeting Rep. Dean in person. I saw him subbing for Zellers at the Ask Minnpost event Doug Grow hosted a few months back. Dean, an architect by trade, tried to argue economics theory with an Economics professor with a PhD. He also had nothing to say to Sen. George Pillsbury, who introduced himself as an exiled Republican, when he told him that their all cuts budget plan wasn't going to work and why. All Dean could say is "We want you back." He had no answers besides the party line and could not back any of it up with data or a well reasoned argument.

Seriously, who let this guy be House Majority Leader?

Mr. Dean, et al, just want people to get their "big" money from the government the old fashioned way - through "privatization" and crony-connected no-bid political-reward contracts.

And how much money was it that TPaw made as a consultant off that telephone company while he was running for governor (money for which he clearly performed NO work whatsoever)?

The fact that Mr. Gaiman could probably buy and sell Mr. Dean a couple of times over (or more) probably doesn't help Mr. Dean's mood. Could there be a bit of jealousy, there, at the fact that there actually ARE truly talented people in the state and Mr. Dean is not and NEVER WILL BE among them?

Will the good people of Minnesota ever learn NOT to elect immature, intellectually-stunted, overgrown playground bullies (i.e. thugs) to office?

"Seriously, who let this guy be House Majority Leader?" - Peter Wagstrom

Don't blame me, I voted for Rebecca Otto.

Who cares if the guy had a PhD? What does he know? Dean has his ideology to keep him righteous.