GOP legislative leaders promise to 'restore confidence'
MORNING EDITION
In a Strib editorial, state GOP leaders Kurt Zellers and Matt Dean offer a bold and fresh new agenda for this year’s legislative session: “This session, we will restore confidence in our economy to foster private-sector job growth, improve education to provide a highly skilled workforce, and make government more-efficient and cost-effective through reform. Business owners aren't looking for government handouts. They need government to get out of the way and allow them to do what they do best — create jobs. Our reform agenda will focus on creating a more competitive tax climate, reduced regulatory burdens, fewer mandates and rules, and reduced government interference in order to get our economy back on track.” As I said, a startling departure.
Today in Bachmannia: Our Gal made her triumphant return to her home state ... of Minnesota. Rupa Shenoy of MPR paid attention: “Bachmann made her first appearance in Minnesota since dropping out of the Republican presidential race on Sunday at an annual anti-abortion protest. Hundreds of people opposed to legal abortion came by school buses from across the state to mark the 39th anniversary of the Supreme Court's Roe vs. Wade decision. Bachmann said the Supreme Court decision should be repealed within the next year. ‘Here on our watch we will stand, we will stand for life, we will never forget, we will never give up, and next year we will gather in a day of celebration when we have finally ended abortion in this all important election,’ she said.”
Unless you were hibernating all weekend, you’ve probably already seen theInternet video of Jewel the mama bear giving birth to two cubs. If you missed it ...
Good story from Dan Browning of the Strib on a guy who faces allegations that might rate him as “The King of Fraud” … if it weren’t for a couple of local legends: “Jim Hoffman had big plans when he dropped out of college to run the family's lucrative farming operation in central Minnesota after his dad died. But before long, bills went unpaid, creditors came calling and his family lost faith. Hoffman's 30-year run of alleged frauds, bad dealings and dishonesty had begun. ... Former business associates, creditors and attorneys depict Hoffman in court records and interviews as a man who's spent most of his life living large on other people's money, then ducking for cover when the bills came due. ... The FBI said in a recent court filing that Jim Hoffman apparently ‘has done nothing but fraud schemes’ to make a living since 1995.”
While not quite in the same league as Mr. Hoffman, above, this guy may have an ironic sense of humor. According to the AP story: “A Duluth man convicted in North Dakota for impersonating a lawyer has filed an appeal in federal court. A Bismarck jury found Howard O. Kieffer guilty in 2010 on charges of mail fraud and false statements. Authorities said he lied on his application to practice law in federal court and worked on federal cases in at least 10 states. Kieffer was sentenced to four years and three months in prison and ordered to repay $152,750 to clients. Kieffer claims in an appeal filed last week that his lawyers did a poor job of representing him. He's asking for a new trial or sentencing hearing.” I repeat, your honor, this has been a grievous breach and miscarriage of injustice.
If climate change continues as it has, the mosquito may have competition for state insect. Says Bill McAuliffe at the Strib: “Midges are also at the heart of the study because of their unusual ability to thrive in the winter, when they serve as trout food. When most other insects are idling, with eggs and larvae hidden away from the cold, midges, armed with a sort of internal antifreeze, produce several generations of offspring. Stream anglers, skiers and others who might poke into the deeper recesses of southeastern Minnesota during winter see them flying in clouds above the water or speckling the streamside snow.”
Frederick Melo of the PiPress casts St. Paul’s thinking regarding either the Minneapolis or Arden Hills Vikings stadium as ... resigned: “One facet of a Minneapolis stadium plan, the proposed debt forgiveness for the Target Center, would create an uneven playing field for Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul leaders say. The two arenas compete for national acts. Other concerns abound, including a possible new commercial district in Arden Hills hurting St. Paul businesses, and the possibility of removing thousands of potential riders from the Central Corridor Light Rail line at a time when rail still is trying to prove itself as a viable transit option. ... if a stadium deal materializes in Minneapolis, it could include a proposal to forgive the debt on Target Center, a downtown Minneapolis hot spot that competes with the Xcel in St. Paul for big-name arena acts like Lady Gaga and Bruce Springsteen. That would put the Xcel at a competitive disadvantage, as shows often are able to land bigger profits at sites that are more publicly subsidized and cheaper to book. Officials privately have said that St. Paul and Minneapolis already enter into virtual bidding wars for shows.”
Taking a break from mewling about taxes in the PiPress, Ol’ Sooch weighed in on the stadium scuffle over the weekend: “We were told that the Metrodome was going to be the biggest boost to downtown development since the invention of the flour mill. Hotels were going to spring up, bars, restaurants, plazas. By the time they got done spinning their web of deception, Dad was going to be at the football game while Mom was going to be lost in a sea of jewelry stores and arcades and haute-couture salons. Mom was going to dazzle them when she got back to Crookston. With the exception of Hubert's, lonely Hubert's, it never happened. So make it happen now. That's the challenge. The bar scene already exists at the Basilica end of town, which would seem to diminish the governor's idea of additional development. Not only is the Metrodome the cheapest site — and already a light-rail stop — but the land around it, the ironically named Industry Square, remains undeveloped and begging for the updates that were promised 32 years ago. If the Vikings have to play at TCF Bank Stadium for a couple of years, that's too bad.”
After its flop in Britain, Best Buy may have another buyer for its “sheds,” as the Brits refer to our big boxes. The story in the Telegraph, by Harry Wallop, says: “[Decathlon] The family-owned French company is understood to be in negotiations over several of the 11 Best Buy shops, though not all of them. This would put it head-to-head with Morrisons, the supermarket group, which is in the lead for most of the sites, as revealed by The Sunday Telegraph this month. The 11 Best Buy sites, all of which are enormous ‘sheds’ in retail parks, are up for sale following Carphone Warehouse's decision late last year to pull its disastrous joint-venture with the American electrical goods giant.”
More like this
- While discussing abortion, Bachmann makes 'surprise disclosure' of her miscarriage
- Failed Virginia bill on miscarriages reveals ignorance about women's health
- YPN5Q: Katie Kieffer
- North Dakota steps into nation's abortion-fight spotlight
- Betty McCollum to discuss proposed federal family planning cuts
Recent Stories
Most Commented
-
27 comments
-
22 comments
-
19 comments
-
18 comments
-
15 comments
Comments (14)
Since the waning "confidence" in the GOP is the result of the public giving them control of both houses of the legislature,...
and given that control, the subsequent revelation that their entire promised agenda of "jobs, jobs, jobs",...
was nothing more than a bait and switch confidence game in which their promises were long forgotten while they gleefully pursued their usual agenda:
enriching the rich and cutting their taxes while punishing those in need of any kind of government services (even those long established),...
and trying to make it far more difficult for large swaths of the population to vote while pursuing a conservative social agenda which the majority of Minnesotans find extremely distasteful,...
and petulantly shutting down the government when they didn't get their way;...
considering that their entire approach has been revealed as one massive con game,...
I can't help but wonder what they're going to be trying to restore confidence in.
Surely not themselves.
If so, I'd suggest they start with Ms. Koch giving us a resounding lecture on the sanctity of straight marriage.
"next year we will gather in a day of celebration when we have finally ended abortion"
Well, no, you will not have "ended abortion", you will simply have made it illegal, which means:
-- abortions will no longer be performed by doctors in safe, clean medical facilities;
-- the resultant maiming and death of women (especially poor, underprivileged women who can't afford to travel to places where abortion is legal);
-- the same women (the ones who live, that is) being subject to criminal charges, as if they needed more tragedy in their lives;
-- the live birth of babies suffering from horrifying ilnesses that cannot be cured and which will only live for days or weeks of hellish suffering;
-- More father's day cards for rapists?
Enjoy your cellebration, Michele!
Maybe one of these days, Ol' Sooch will mewl about you mewling about his mewling, Brian. Wouldn't that be fun?
If abortion is made Illegal in the United States it would be a boon to both foreign travel and American poverty.
Since Our Gal was preening on the MCCL stage about making the "choice" of life, that obviously suggests that she's all for people making their own choices—except that she isn't.
Like most Repubs, choice is a one-sided coin, where their view of what's right and just is your "choice" but anything else should be prohibited.
Too bad these so-called evangelicals haven't actually read the Bible: nowhere does it say that abortion is wrong, or a sin, etc. Or, maybe they have read it and are instead choosing to ignore that major inconvenience to their argument.
Mark observes: "nowhere does it [the bible] say that abortion is wrong, or a sin, etc."
"Thou Shalt Not Kill" ring any bells? Sheesh...
I may actually agree with Sooch. Oh no, I think I'm going to be ill...
In reference to Mark's comment in #5 that nowhere in the Bible does it say abortion is a sin:
Actually, it does. In Ex. 20:13 it says "You shall not murder." The reason that Leftists ignore this commandment in reference to abortion is because they believe the preborn baby is the same as a tumor or infection. It's not murder to destroy a tumor or infection. It is murder, however, if the preborn baby is a human being.
"A startling departure?" The words spoken by the Republican leadership are all code for continuing their effort to roll back the New Deal, so the poor can all be "self reliant" again like they were before the Roosevelt administration. Minnesota members of the American Legislative Exchange Council no doubt just attended its winter program in Arizona and are armed with yet more ideas about making government more "efficient" while serving corporate power very nicely, thank you.
A friend who is a NAMI member sent me the list of legislation and amendments they are keeping an eye on because of the potential (or for sure) harm passing them will do to those in need. You can see it at www.namihelps.org.
---------------------------
Re: Arden Hills. Not only would an Arden Hills stadium leach customers from businesses in the Central Corridor, but I think we could bet real money on having to build a light rail line to the stadium and Mr. W's "village."
@#6
Yeah...and it kind of reminds me of Texas for some reason. Nothing like a healthy dose of hypocrisy to start my afternoon!
@#8. I've never heard a liberal say a fetus is the same as a tumor or infection. Are you making this stuff up? Of course you are. That's what I've come to expect.
To Rachel W. You are right. The technical term for an aborted baby is Product of Conception, or P.O.C. It doesn't sound like something you would want to carry home in a knit cap and fuzzy blanket, does it?
@#12
Yes, that is the medical term. It may perhaps be intentional that it doesn't sound like something you'd want to carry home in a knit cap and fuzzy blanket. But it's not what your average (pro-choice or otherwise) person calls them.
By the way, there's no such thing as a "preborn" baby, as babies can't be aquired without a gestation period (unless you believe the stork brings them, still). Because babies actually require a gestation period (and must be born), they are a very real risk to the mother's health. While most people choose to take that risk, not all are given the opportunity to choose to become pregnant. Even after they are born, they are not simply dolls that you can coo over and dress up without having to worry about anything but how cute they are. Children, especially babies, are a HUGE responsibility. And there are not nearly enough people out there willing to take that responsibility for the people who aren't.
As for tumors and infection, that's a very gauche way to put it--but then, I suspect that's intentional. Give something a term like "preborn baby" so that it sounds cute and cuddly, while demonizing those who disagree with you by accusing them of calling a fetus a tumor or an infection. But, if you must accuse people of being monstrous, let's accuse the female body. All of them. The human female body will abort a fertilized egg with little provocation. Sometimes, it takes longer for the body to decide to destroy an embryo. Up to 70% of conceptions end in miscarriages before the first trimester ends. Between 15 and 30% of those pregnancies that advance to a stage where the woman knows she is pregnant end in miscarriages. This would indicate that most fertile women have destroyed an embryo simply by conceiving. The body knows that it should not produce a baby when it knows it can't handle it. Yet, to decide consciously is considered murder?
#8
So here on these pages you are going to enlighten us all that you have determined for all of us just when life begins. How is it that you have the answer just now when so many have puzzled over this all through the ages. Traditionally abortion has been with us, yes even in Biblical times. There was an understanding that 'quickening' or 'drawing breath' was a point of no return. I am curious why it was just within my lifetime that the Catholic Church has determined when life began. And why they felt it necessary to bury the hatchet with protestants on this issue alone. Could it be political?
How do you reconcile 'thou shall not kill' with the rights support of capital punishment and their thirst for war? Or even the crowds response at a recent debate to the ill fellow without insurance. And is contraception off the table? The Philippines can not feed themselves, and they are adding 2 M new babies each year. Is starvation preferable to family planning help? The Catholic church there is saying they will bury any one who supports contraception.