
MinnPost thanks these major sponsors:
Sponsor of
Second Opinion
Sponsor of
Community Sketchbook
Our major advertisers
Our in-kind partners

MinnPost thanks these generous donors:
INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik
(See all donors here.)
By Susan Perry | Published Fri, Jul 31 2009 10:39 am
I had to laugh when I read the headlines in the British press today:
“Average 50-something fitter than 25-year-old, study claims”
“How the average 50-year-old is healthier than someone half their age”
“50-year-olds are fitter and healthier than 25-year-olds, claims new study”
Really?
I don’t know about you, dear MinnPost reader, but even though I pretty much practice what I preach (eat a fairly healthful diet and exercise daily), my 20-something children could easily leave me in the dust if we were to set out on a 5K run today. Yes, that includes my daughter, who gave birth just three weeks ago.
They have youth on their side.
That’s not to say there aren’t 50-somethings out there who could outrun my children. And, as I know from running races, I can outpace some people half my age.
But is the average 50-something fitter than the average 20-something? I doubt it.
And, indeed, that’s not what the “study” (which was really a survey commissioned by a herbal supplement company) found. It did not attempt to determine anybody’s health status.
What the survey actually revealed was the not-so-shocking fact that middle-aged people tend, on average, to pay more attention to their health than their younger peers. And why wouldn’t we? We’re more aware that the clock is ticking.
Here are some of the findings from the survey (which involved 4,000 people, aged 16 to 80), as reported in the Scottish Daily Record:
The average 25-year-old in Britain consumes more than 2,300 calories a day, exercises only three times a week and scoffs 12 types of junk food a month.
But the typical 50-year-old has only 1,990 calories each day, does at least four forms of exercise and treats themselves to just one piece of junk food each week.
And while those in their mid-20s have three takeaways a month, the older generation have only one.
But I was more intrigued by a couple of other findings:
• More than 25 percent of all the Brits surveyed said they bicycled to see friends or to go shopping.
• Almost 4 in 10 of the respondents said they walked either all the way to work or part of the way (to a train station).
(Compare that last figure to a 2005 U.S. Census Bureau analysis that found 9 out of 10 Americans drive to work.)
So what do you think? Are the 50-somethings in your life fitter than the 20-somethings?
Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.
2 Comments: Hide/Show Comments
Forgot Password? | Register to Comment
MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.
We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.