
MinnPost thanks these major sponsors:
Sponsor of
Second Opinion
Sponsor of
Community Sketchbook
Our major advertisers
Our in-kind partners

MinnPost thanks these generous donors:
INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik
(See all donors here.)
By Susan Perry | Published Mon, Aug 24 2009 11:05 am
An argument could be made — and frequently has been made — that the off-label use of certain drugs in certain situations is a good thing.
And, indeed, prescribing drugs off-label (for uses not specifically approved by the Food and Drug Administration) is quite common. A study published in 2006 found that about 21 percent of all physician-prescribed medications in the United States were for off-label purposes.
But when it comes to off-label prescribing, I would expect at least two things from my doctor:
1) that I be told that the drug I’m receiving has not been specifically approved for my medical condition, and
2) that my doctor know this.
Amazingly, a new survey has found that a “substantial minority” — 41 percent — of physicians are unaware that one or more of the uses for which they’re prescribing certain drugs are off-label.
In fact, of the 1,199 physicians surveyed (599 primary care physicians and 600 psychiatrists), only half were able to correctly identify the FDA-approval status of the 22 drug-indication pairs (particular drugs prescribed for particular conditions) included in the survey. (The survey used psychiatric medications because they’re among those most often prescribed for off-label uses by psychiatrists and generalists alike.)
A couple of disquieting examples of findings from the survey (which was published online this month in the journal Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety):
[A]mong the 42% of physicians who prescribed quetiapine (Seroquel) for dementia with agitation during the previous 12 months, nearly one in five (19%) erroneously believed it was FDA-approved for this use, when in fact quetiapine has never been FDA-approved for this indication and at the time of our survey carried a black-box warning for “increased risk of death compared to placebo” in elderly patients with dementia.
[A]mong the 72% of physicians who reported having used lorazepam to treat chronic anxiety during the previous year, one in three (33%) reported that it was FDA approved for this use, when in fact an FDA warning specifically advises against this application.
Yet 95 percent of the physicians surveyed reported — often wrongly, as it turned out — that they generally know the FDA-labeled indications of the medications they prescribe!
“These findings highlight a pressing need for more effective methods to inform physicians about the evidence base, or lack thereof, for drugs they prescribe off label,” concluded the survey's authors.
They also highlight the need for us patients to continually ask questions of our physicians.
Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.
3 Comments: Hide/Show Comments
Forgot Password? | Register to Comment
MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.
We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.