SERVING MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL / MINNESOTA
Donate Now Sustaining Member

MinnPost thanks these major sponsors:




Sponsor of
Second Opinion



Our major advertisers


Our in-kind partners


MinnPost thanks these generous donors:

INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik

(See all donors here.)

This content is made possible by the generous sponsorship support of UCare.
  • Switch to Small Text Size
  • Switch to Medium Text Size
  • Switch to Large Text Size
Email Print Submit a Comment

    Feeling creative? Maybe you're in love

    By Susan Perry | Published Fri, Oct 2 2009 9:56 am

    Can falling in love — or even thinking about it — make you more creative?

    Yes, according to some new and intriguing experiments by a team of Dutch researchers. They’ve found our minds work differently when we’re in a romantic relationship.

    Being smitten with the love bug apparently makes us think more “globally” and less analytically — a neural shift known to promote creative problem-solving.

    Here’s no surprise: Love also accentuates the halo effect, the psychological phenomenon by which we tend to pile all sorts of positive (and often non-existing) traits on a person because he or she has one trait we like (or love). What is surprising, though, is that when we’re in love we tend to extend that halo effect to our evaluations of other objects — even inanimate ones, like chairs! The halo effect, say psychologists, is a reflection of global (and thus more creative) thought processes.

    Ah, but don’t confuse thoughts of love with thoughts of sex. The same experiments found that when subliminally presented with words that put them in a “sex condition” as opposed to a “love condition” (don’t you enjoy scientists’ jargon?), volunteers solved fewer creativity problems — but more analytical ones.

    Being in a “sex condition” also caused the halo effect to diminish.

    You’ll find a great discussion of this research at Scientific American’s Mind Matters blog. As psychologists Nira Liberman and Oren Shapira note in their summary of the studies, “The takeaway lesson is that thinking about love, or anything that promotes a distal perspective or global processing, can make us more creative. Perhaps love is an especially potent way to induce in us a sense of transcendence — being in the here and now yet also contemplating the distant future and maybe even eternity.”

    Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.

    Advertisement:

    0 Comments:

    E-mail address

    Password

     

    Forgot Password? | Register to Comment

    MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.

    We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.


    medium_UCareLogo125.jpg

    Health care that starts with you. That's what you'll find at UCare, the fourth-largest health plan in Minnesota, serving more than 225,000 members across Minnesota and 26 counties in western Wisconsin.

    minnpost.com/healthblog


    Susan Perry

    In "Second Opinion" Susan Perry will coordinate coverage to help MinnPost readers make their way through the thicket of health happenings, trends, studies and research. Perry has written several health-related books, and her articles have appeared in a wide variety of publications, including Minnesota Monthly, The History Channel Magazine and Woman's Day. She is a former writer/editor for Time-Life Books and a former editor of Nutrition Action Healthletter, published by the Center for Science in the Public Interest. Perry can be reached at sperry [at] minnpost [dot] com.

    Recent Second Opinion posts