SERVING MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL / MINNESOTA

MinnPost.com Job Listing of the Day!
MinnPost.com Job Listing of the Day!

Browse
Minnesota Jobs
Direct from Company Websites!

Unadvertised,
Current,
Highest-quality

Start Searching Now!

 





 

SECOND OPINION

  • Switch to Small Text Size
  • Switch to Medium Text Size
  • Switch to Large Text Size
Recommend to a friend Print Submit a Comment

    Will the FDA finally enforce its food labeling rules?

    By Susan Perry | Published Thu, Oct 29 2009 10:24 am

    Maybe we’ll finally see an end to those misleading labels on breakfast cereals (and other processed foods).

    Last week, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced that it had begun a long-overdue analysis of nutritional claims on food labels to determine if any of them are misleading and thus violate federal food labeling rules. The FDA also said it intended to develop new science-based standards for front-of-the-package nutrition labeling.

    Almost immediately, Kellogg, Kraft, Minnesota-headquartered General Mills and 11 other food companies announced they were voluntarily suspending their Smart Choices food-labeling program. That’s the program, introduced last August, that uses green labels on the front of packages to let us harried and oh-so-gullible consumers think that some processed foods are healthier than others.

    No matter that the label could be found on Fruit Loops, Cocoa Puffs, Fudgesicles and other products that may contain up to 50 percent sugar and/or up to 80 percent of the recommended daily dietary fat allowance!

    According to Forbes magazine, the food companies spent $1.47 million to develop this highly dubious marketing ploy.

    Bad habits are hard to break, however. If you’ve hiked down your local grocery store’s cereal aisle lately, you may have noticed the breathless new banner plastered (in very large font) across the front of the sugary, chocolate-laden cereal Cocoa Krispies:

    “Now Helps Support Your Child’s Immunity.”

    I wasn’t the only person to think this label was a cynical attempt to cash in on parents’ worries this fall about the H1N1 (swine flu) virus. On Tuesday, San Francisco’s city attorney, Dennis Herrera, sent off a sharply worded letter to Kellogg’s CEO, David Mackay, asking for the scientific evidence behind the immunity claim.

    “The Immunity Claims may falsely suggest to parents that cereals like Cocoa Krispies are more healthy for their children than other breakfast foods that are not high in sugar and not highly processed,” the letter noted. “The Immunity Claims may also mislead parents into believing that serving this sugary cereal will actually boost their child’s immunity, leaving parents less likely to take more productive steps to protect their children’s health.”

    Of course, by the time the matter is resolved and the label is taken off cereal boxes (undoubtedly “voluntarily”), the flu season will be over — and Kellogg and the other food companies will be dreaming up questionable product claims for next year.

    Let’s hope the FDA finally puts some teeth into its food labeling rules. 

    Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.

    Advertisement:

    1 Comments: Hide/Show Comments

    1 Comment: Hide/Show Comment

    0 Comments:

    E-mail address

    Password

     

    Forgot Password? | Register to Comment

    MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.

    We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.


    Illustration by Hugh Bennewitz


    minnpost.com/healthblog



    In "Second Opinion" Susan Perry will coordinate coverage to help MinnPost readers make their way through the thicket of health happenings, trends, studies and research. Perry has written several health-related books, and her articles have appeared in a wide variety of publications, including Minnesota Monthly, The History Channel Magazine and Woman's Day. She is a former writer/editor for Time-Life Books and a former editor of Nutrition Action Healthletter, published by the Center for Science in the Public Interest. Perry can be reached at sperry [at] minnpost [dot] com.

    Recent Second Opinion posts