SERVING MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL / MINNESOTA
Donate Now Sustaining Member

MinnPost thanks these major sponsors:




Sponsor of
Second Opinion



Our major advertisers


Our in-kind partners


MinnPost thanks these generous donors:

INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik

(See all donors here.)

This content is made possible by the generous sponsorship support of UCare.
  • Switch to Small Text Size
  • Switch to Medium Text Size
  • Switch to Large Text Size
Email Print Submit a Comment

    'Fall back' time switch may be harder on larks than night owls

    By Susan Perry | Published Mon, Nov 2 2009 11:03 am

    You may have gained an hour over the weekend as we ditched daylight saving time for standard time.

    But do you feel more rested?

    In theory, you should. After all, you had an extra 60 minutes this morning to get your act together before heading out to work (if you still have a job in this recession, that is). And, if you had wanted to, you could have spent that hour asleep under your comforter, reliving in your dreams the Minnesota Vikings’ great victory yesterday. 

    But a small Finnish study published late last year came to an interesting conclusion about the transition out of (in the fall) and into (in the spring) daylight saving time. 

    It found that the fall transition was more difficult for morning-type people. Those are the people whose internal biological clocks, including the ones that determine alertness, rev up early in the morning. You know — the people (mea culpa) who are annoyingly chipper at the breakfast table, even without a cup of coffee. 

    This finding surprised the study’s authors, as standard time contributes a bonus hour of light to the mornings — the period of the day so beloved by morning people. 

    Almost all the participants in the Finnish study — morning and evening people alike — slept less efficiently in the days after the fall time change than after the spring change. (Sleep efficiency = actual sleep time divided by time in bed.) Their sleep was, on average, 54 percent more fragmented and disrupted in the fall compared to 37 percent in the spring. 

    But it was the morning people who seemed to feel the effects of that fragmented sleep. 

    Of course, evening-type people (those who mumble their way through breakfast but who are wide-eyed at midnight) have their own time-adjustment struggles. But their nemesis is the hour they lose in the spring, when we switch back to daylight saving time. In fact, their biological clocks may never truly adapt to the change. 

    A final note: Last year, a Swedish study found a small association between heart attacks and our twice-yearly time shifts. Heart attacks increased for the first three weekdays after the transition to daylight saving time in the spring, but only for one day after the change to standard time in the fall. 

    Um, that one day is today. 

    So take it easy. And for all you morning people who are feeling a bit sluggish today: Try an extra cup of coffee this morning.

    Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.

    Advertisement:

    0 Comments:

    E-mail address

    Password

     

    Forgot Password? | Register to Comment

    MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.

    We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.


    medium_UCareLogo125.jpg

    Health care that starts with you. That's what you'll find at UCare, the fourth-largest health plan in Minnesota, serving more than 225,000 members across Minnesota and 26 counties in western Wisconsin.

    minnpost.com/healthblog


    Susan Perry

    In "Second Opinion" Susan Perry will coordinate coverage to help MinnPost readers make their way through the thicket of health happenings, trends, studies and research. Perry has written several health-related books, and her articles have appeared in a wide variety of publications, including Minnesota Monthly, The History Channel Magazine and Woman's Day. She is a former writer/editor for Time-Life Books and a former editor of Nutrition Action Healthletter, published by the Center for Science in the Public Interest. Perry can be reached at sperry [at] minnpost [dot] com.

    Recent Second Opinion posts