SERVING MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL / MINNESOTA
Donate Now Sustaining Member

MinnPost thanks these major sponsors:




Sponsor of
Second Opinion



Our major advertisers


Our in-kind partners


MinnPost thanks these generous donors:

INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik

(See all donors here.)

This content is made possible by the generous sponsorship support of UCare.
  • Switch to Small Text Size
  • Switch to Medium Text Size
  • Switch to Large Text Size
Email Print Submit a Comment

    Is Friday the 13th bad for your health?

    By Susan Perry | Published Fri, Nov 13 2009 10:30 am

    Believe it or not, a handful of studies have actually investigated this issue. After all, superstitious beliefs can affect behavior, and behavior definitely affects health.

    But let me quickly reassure those of you who might be slightly paraskevidekatriaphobic (irrationally fearful of Friday the 13th): Although few and small, the studies on this topic strongly suggest that you’re not at increased risk of having an accident  today — well, unless your fear and anxiety about today gets the better of you.

    A gender dispute
    I’ll start with the completely good-news study: In 2008, statisticians working for a Dutch insurance company reported that people in the Netherlands experienced fewer accidents (and fires and thefts) on Fridays that fell on the 13th of the month than on Fridays that fell on other dates  (7,500 versus 7,800 reports, on average).

    On the other hand, a 2002 Finnish study came up with a more worrisome finding. It reported that on Friday the 13th, the risk of dying in a traffic accident for women (not men) increased by 63 percent. The study’s author suggested that the increased risk might be caused by women’s “twice-as-high prevalence of neurotic disorders and anxiety symptoms,” which makes them “more susceptible to superstition and worsening of driving performance.”

    Needless to say, that finding didn’t go down well, particularly when all sorts of methodological problems were found with the study. A couple of years later, two other Finnish researchers reported that their investigation revealed no increase in traffic accidents — among women or men — on Friday the 13th.

    “However,” they concluded, a bit ominously, “this does not imply a non-existent effect of superstition related anxiety on accident risk as no exposure-to-risk data are available. People who are anxious of ‘Black Friday’ may stay home, or at least avoid driving a car.”

    Will the boss agree?
    By far, though, my favorite study on this topic (for its readability alone) remains a 1993 one published in the British Medical Journal. It made the slightly startling finding that although fewer British people drove on Friday the 13th, compared with other Fridays, driving-related accidents increased by as much as 52 percent on that day.

    The authors’ must-be-tongue-in-cheek conclusion: “Staying at home is recommended.”

    Here’s what they say:

    Friday the 13th may indeed be a very unlucky day. If the change in behaviour reveals itself by increased fear and anxiety, or perhaps a sense of destiny, it may reduce concentration and increase the likelihood of an accident. Are people’s perceptions and beliefs self fulfilling — if you believe something strongly enough will it in fact happen to you? While we await the answers to these difficult questions we may just have to accept that Friday the 13th is indeed unlucky for some and it might be safer to stay at home.

    Now, how to convince the boss?

    Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.

    Advertisement:

    2 Comments: Hide/Show Comments

    E-mail address

    Password

     

    Forgot Password? | Register to Comment

    MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.

    We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.


    medium_UCareLogo125.jpg

    Health care that starts with you. That's what you'll find at UCare, the fourth-largest health plan in Minnesota, serving more than 225,000 members across Minnesota and 26 counties in western Wisconsin.

    minnpost.com/healthblog


    Susan Perry

    In "Second Opinion" Susan Perry will coordinate coverage to help MinnPost readers make their way through the thicket of health happenings, trends, studies and research. Perry has written several health-related books, and her articles have appeared in a wide variety of publications, including Minnesota Monthly, The History Channel Magazine and Woman's Day. She is a former writer/editor for Time-Life Books and a former editor of Nutrition Action Healthletter, published by the Center for Science in the Public Interest. Perry can be reached at sperry [at] minnpost [dot] com.

    Recent Second Opinion posts