SERVING MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL / MINNESOTA

MinnPost thanks these major sponsors:


Sponsor of
Second Opinion



MinnPost thanks these generous donors of $25,000 or more:

MAJOR FOUNDATIONS

John S. and James L.
Knight Foundation
Blandin Foundation
McKnight Foundation
Minneapolis Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation

INDIVIDUALS & FAMILY FOUNDATIONS
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Sam & Stacey Heins
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown
Foundation
(See all donors here.)

MinnPost.com Job Listing of the Day!
MinnPost.com Job Listing of the Day!

Browse
Minnesota Jobs
Direct from Company Websites!

Unadvertised,
Current,
Highest-quality

Start Searching Now!

This content is made possible by the generous sponsorship support of UCare.
  • Switch to Small Text Size
  • Switch to Medium Text Size
  • Switch to Large Text Size
Recommend to a friend Print Submit a Comment

    Common chemical in plastic linked to male sexual problems

    By Susan Perry | Published Mon, Nov 16 2009 12:27 pm

    The manufacturers of bisphenol-A (BPA), the controversial compound found in literally thousands of consumer products (including many food containers), took a big PR blow last week with the publication of a new study linking BPA with male sexual dysfunction.

    The study, funded by the U.S. government and published in the journal Human Reproduction, is the first to investigate the impact of BPA on the human reproductive system. Previous studies had uncovered disturbing adverse health effects on laboratory animals, including damage to the brain and nervous system and cellular changes associated with breast and testicular cancer.

    For the current study, researchers followed 634 male factory workers in China over five years. The men who were exposed to high workplace levels of BPA reported significantly more sexual dysfunction than their peers who worked in factories where BPA wasn’t present.

    Specifically, the BPA-exposed workers were four times more likely to experience erectile dysfunction and reduced sexual desire and seven times more likely to have difficulty with ejaculation.

    And the sexual problems developed within only months of taking a job with high BPA exposure.

    True, the levels of BPA exposure experienced by the Chinese workers were 50 times those faced by the average American man. Yet this study raises the troubling question of whether lesser levels of the chemical could also affect sexual function.

    An interesting perspective

    Blogging for U.S. News and World Report, physician-journalist Ford Vox, MD, brings up an important point about the just-published study: The factory workers in this study inhaled the BPA particles at their workplace. In the U.S., BPA typically enters the body through the digestive system. Could that make a difference? Writes Vox:

    We're more akin to the men who were used as controls in the study: the men who live in the same city but who don't work in the BPA factories. They were still exposed, of course, but in the same way we are here, by BPA in plastics infiltrating the food we eat. The urine BPA concentrations in [the] control groups are also similar to those seen in Americans. Their reported sexual dysfunction is similar to that seen in surveyed American men.

    The study’s authors, Vox reports, are already diving into the data to see if different levels of BPA in the control population correlate with different levels of sexual complaints. “That study will mean much more to American men,” says Vox.

    Vox also points out that BPA may be among men’s “least likely excuses for sexual misfires.” He writes:

    Simply being between 40 and 70 years old gives you a fifty-fifty chance of having a minor malfunction the next time you're with your partner. [Erectile dysfunction] is so common that stress (or even a pessimistic attitude) generates odds similar to those ... reported in the BPA-bathed factory workers. Combine psychology and relationship variables with the better understood "organic" mechanisms (diabetes, heart disease, drinking, smoking, drug side effects), and avoiding BPA would have to rank pretty low on your personal to-do health list. After you've controlled your cholesterol, blood pressure, resting heart rate, blood sugar, etc., by all means attempt to limit your BPA exposure.

    Reducing your exposure

    Limiting exposure to BPA is not easy, however. In its December issue, Consumer Reports published a study that found BPA leaching into the food of almost all the metal food cans it tested — including those labeled “BPA-free” or “organic.”

    The highest levels of BPA were found in canned green beans and canned soup.

    “A 165-pound adult eating one serving of canned green beans from our sample, which averaged 123.5 ppb, could ingest about 0.2 micrograms of BPA per kilogram of body weight per day, about 80 times higher than our experts' recommended daily upper limit,” notes Consumer Reports. “And children eating multiple servings per day of canned foods with BPA levels comparable to the ones we found in some tested products could get a dose of BPA approaching levels that have caused adverse effects in several animal studies.”

    Consumer Union, which publishes Consumer Reports, has called for Congress and food manufacturers to eliminate BPA from all materials that come in contact with food. (The Food and Drug Administration is currently reassessing the safety of the chemical.)  In the meantime, it recommends that you take the following three easy steps to reduce your exposure to BPA:

    • Choose fresh food whenever possible.
    • Consider alternatives to canned food, beverages, juices and infant formula.
    • Use glass containers when heating food in microwave ovens.

     

    Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.

    Advertisement:

    1 Comments: Hide/Show Comments

    1 Comment: Hide/Show Comment

    0 Comments:

    E-mail address

    Password

     

    Forgot Password? | Register to Comment

    MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.

    We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.


    medium_UCareLogo125.jpg

    Health care that starts with you. That's what you'll find at UCare, the fourth-largest health plan in Minnesota, serving more than 185,000 members across Minnesota and 26 counties in western Wisconsin.

    Recent Second Opinion posts

    Illustration by Hugh Bennewitz


    minnpost.com/healthblog


    In "Second Opinion" Susan Perry will coordinate coverage to help MinnPost readers make their way through the thicket of health happenings, trends, studies and research. Perry has written several health-related books, and her articles have appeared in a wide variety of publications, including Minnesota Monthly, The History Channel Magazine and Woman's Day. She is a former writer/editor for Time-Life Books and a former editor of Nutrition Action Healthletter, published by the Center for Science in the Public Interest. Perry can be reached at sperry [at] minnpost [dot] com.