SERVING MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL / MINNESOTA
Donate Now Sustaining Member

MinnPost thanks these major sponsors:




Sponsor of
Second Opinion



Our major advertisers


Our in-kind partners


MinnPost thanks these generous donors:

INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik

(See all donors here.)

This content is made possible by the generous sponsorship support of UCare.
  • Switch to Small Text Size
  • Switch to Medium Text Size
  • Switch to Large Text Size
Email Print Submit a Comment

    Study: Thinking about the past or future can be moving (literally)

    By Susan Perry | Published Fri, Jan 29 2010 1:12 pm

    The only way we can travel through time, of course, is in our mind.

    But as we do so — as we contemplate either our past or our future — our body moves ever so imperceptibly with us.

    Specifically, we sway slightly backward when we muse about the past and slightly forward when we turn our thoughts to the future.

    That’s the curious finding from a new study conducted by a team of researchers at the University of Aberdeen in Scotland and published earlier this month in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

    The finding suggests that the invisible process of mental time travel (chronesthesia) elicits an unconscious physical movement — a movement that reflects our metaphor for time (past = back; future = forward).

    In other words, our perceptions of time and space may be very closely linked.

    Here are the specifics about the study: The scientists fitted 20 young adults with a movement sensor. They then blindfolded the participants and asked them to recall what a typical day was like for them four years earlier or to envision what a day in their life might be like four years in the future. The sensors detected that the participants consistently leaned backward when dwelling mentally in the past and forward when imagining the future.

    Are there any other examples of this kind of coupling of thought and subtle physical movement?

    Not that he knows of, wrote psychologist Lynden Miles, the study’s lead author, in an email to me earlier this week.

    “The closest I know of,” he wrote, “is the link between the experience and expression of emotion — for instance, emotional states (e.g., happiness) can influence our facial expressions (e.g., smiling) and shape the way we move (e.g, walking speed, gait patterns, etc.). While this isn’t a direct coupling of thought to movement, it’s similar to the extent that emotions are essentially invisible until they are overtly manifest, for example, in patterns of movement.”

    I also asked Miles if his findings were cultural-specific — in other words, would people in cultures where time isn’t viewed in a straight line show different movements when thinking about the past and the future?

    “We don’t know yet,” he answered. “Some research suggests that not all cultures think of the past as being behind them and the future in front of them — for example, speakers of Aymara, an Amerindian language of the Andes, report the reverse mapping (i.e., past = forward, future = backward). However, this evidence comes from patterns of language use rather than movement. As such, it’s an open question as to whether this group would show movements consistent with our participants, or alternatively, consistent with their local patterns of language use.”

    The question is an important one, he added: “It may help inform us about the origins of the sorts of effects we are reporting. That is, do we come to associate time with space in particular ways because of repeated exposure to language, (e.g., metaphors) or is the mechanism grounded in more basic, non-linguistic processes?”

    Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.

    Advertisement:

    1 Comment: Hide/Show Comment

    E-mail address

    Password

     

    Forgot Password? | Register to Comment

    MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.

    We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.


    medium_UCareLogo125.jpg

    Health care that starts with you. That's what you'll find at UCare, the fourth-largest health plan in Minnesota, serving more than 225,000 members across Minnesota and 26 counties in western Wisconsin.

    minnpost.com/healthblog


    Susan Perry

    In "Second Opinion" Susan Perry will coordinate coverage to help MinnPost readers make their way through the thicket of health happenings, trends, studies and research. Perry has written several health-related books, and her articles have appeared in a wide variety of publications, including Minnesota Monthly, The History Channel Magazine and Woman's Day. She is a former writer/editor for Time-Life Books and a former editor of Nutrition Action Healthletter, published by the Center for Science in the Public Interest. Perry can be reached at sperry [at] minnpost [dot] com.

    Recent Second Opinion posts