SERVING MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL / MINNESOTA
Donate Now Sustaining Member

MinnPost thanks these major sponsors:




Sponsor of
Second Opinion



Our major advertisers


Our in-kind partners


MinnPost thanks these generous donors:

INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik

(See all donors here.)

This content is made possible by the generous sponsorship support of UCare.
  • Switch to Small Text Size
  • Switch to Medium Text Size
  • Switch to Large Text Size
Email Print Submit a Comment

    Forbes highlights misleading drug ads

    By Susan Perry | Published Fri, Feb 5 2010 10:21 am

    Forbes magazine has put up a must-see slide show of “Ten Misleading Drug Ads.”

    These are among the 41 advertising and promotional campaigns that generated warning letters in 2009 from the apparently newly energized U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which regulates such advertising. (Hat tip: Gary Schwitzer’s HealthNewsReview blog.)

    As Forbes reporter Rebecca Ruiz notes, the FDA issued twice as many enforcement letters in 2009, under President Obama’s administration, than it did the previous year under President George W. Bush’s watch. (I posted on Monday about FDA warning letters sent to pharmaceutical companies last year regarding online ads.)

    But that's still way below the 142 that were sent out in 1997, the year, as Ruiz puts it, when the "FDA issued new rules for direct-to-consumer advertising, opening the floodgates for drug companies to advertise on television."

    As one source quoted by Forbes said (with considerable understatement), during the Bush administration "FDA leadership made it clear they were not going to be zealous in keeping the industry's feet to the fire on such ads."

    We'll have to wait and see exactly how zealous the agency will be under President Obama.

    Pharmaceutical chutzpah

    The misinformation that appears in some drug ads is quite remarkable. Writes Ruiz:

    Sometimes companies egregiously exaggerate how well their drugs work. In a brochure given to doctors and nurses last year, the Japanese drug company Eisai claimed that its Dacogen drug helped 38% of patients with a rare blood cell disorder in a clinical study. This figure was false, the FDA said in a November 2009 warning letter. In fact, the figure was taken from a tiny subgroup of patients who responded well to the drug. When all patients in the study were included, the real response rate was a much less impressive 20%, the FDA noted.
    "It’s almost impossible for the public to actually parse the ads and come to their own independent conclusions," says Cleveland Clinic cardiologist Steven Nissen, a fierce critic of drug ads.
    But Nissen is suspicious of most drugs that are advertised because he thinks that the marketing campaigns distract and mislead consumers. His advice: avoid the most heavily advertised drugs and stick to generics.

    Each of the 10 ads featured in the Forbes article comes with a brief explanation of the FDA’s concerns — things like not fully reporting a drug’s side effects, or exaggerating its benefits, or suggesting that it be used “off-label” (for a purpose that hasn’t been approved by the FDA). For readers who want more details, the article also includes links to the actual warning letters that the agency sent to manufacturer of the drug or medical device.

    Here’s a list of the products in the ads featured by Forbes:

    • Latisse (a prescription eyelash thickening agent)
    • Cymbalta (a prescription drug used to treat fibromyalgia and depression)
    • Kaletra (an AIDS drug)
    • Mirena (a hormone-releasing intrauterine device)
    • Treximet (a drug used for migraine relief)
    • Depakote ER (a drug used for treating bi-polar disorder)
    • Ertaczo (a drug used for treating the fungus that causes athlete’s foot)
    • Fosrenol (a drug used for treating kidney failure)
    • Visipaque (a drug used in heart imaging procedures)
    • Dacogen (a drug used to treat rare blood-cell disorders and blood cancers)

    Like Gary Schwitzer, I, too, wish Forbes hadn't decided to stop at 10.

    Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.

    Advertisement:

    3 Comments: Hide/Show Comments

    E-mail address

    Password

     

    Forgot Password? | Register to Comment

    MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.

    We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.


    medium_UCareLogo125.jpg

    Health care that starts with you. That's what you'll find at UCare, the fourth-largest health plan in Minnesota, serving more than 225,000 members across Minnesota and 26 counties in western Wisconsin.

    minnpost.com/healthblog


    Susan Perry

    In "Second Opinion" Susan Perry will coordinate coverage to help MinnPost readers make their way through the thicket of health happenings, trends, studies and research. Perry has written several health-related books, and her articles have appeared in a wide variety of publications, including Minnesota Monthly, The History Channel Magazine and Woman's Day. She is a former writer/editor for Time-Life Books and a former editor of Nutrition Action Healthletter, published by the Center for Science in the Public Interest. Perry can be reached at sperry [at] minnpost [dot] com.

    Recent Second Opinion posts