
MinnPost thanks these major sponsors:
Sponsor of
Second Opinion
Sponsor of
Community Sketchbook
Our major advertisers
Our in-kind partners

MinnPost thanks these generous donors:
INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik
(See all donors here.)
By Susan Perry | Published Fri, Jun 18 2010 10:16 am
Are you over 40 and wondering if it’s too late for you to write your Great American Novel?
Hey, don’t worry.
Despite New York Times Book Review editor Sam Tanenhaus’ essay last week on the “essential truth about fiction writers,” that they “often compose their best and most lasting work when they are young,” you may still have time to create your masterpiece.
And that goes for those of you whose creative muse inhabits a non-literary field, say, painting or composing or even biology.
At least, that’s what science writer Jonah Lehrer proposes in his blog, Frontal Cortex (and I'm at an age where I want to believe him).
Unlike Tanenhaus, who relies on anecdotes for his argument, Lehrer (who’s under 30, I might add) cites some research on the topic:
[A] psychologist at UC-Davis, Dean Simonton, has assembled the historiometric data. He finds that the vast majority of disciplines obey an inverted U curve of creativity. … For instance, Simonton has found that poets and physicists tend to produce their finest work in their late 20s, while geologists, biologists and novelists tend to peak much later, often not until they reach late middle age. Simonton argues that those disciplines with an “intricate, highly articulated body of domain knowledge,” such as physics, chess and poetry, tend to encourage youthful productivity. In contrast, fields that are more loosely defined, in which the basic concepts are ambiguous and unclear — examples include history, literary criticism and biology—lead to later peak productive ages.
Lehrer also cites research by David Galenson, an economist at the University of Chicago:
Galenson divides creators into two distinct categories: conceptual innovators and experimental innovators. In general, conceptual innovators make sudden and radical breakthroughs by formulating new ideas, often at an early age. In contrast, experimental innovators work by trial and error, and typically require decades of tinkering before they produce a major work.
Whew! There's still time.
Creative anecdotes
Although Lehrer says anecdotes aren’t helpful to this argument (they can cut both ways), I personally find them … well, reassuring. So I asked my friend, local writer and illustrator Eric Hanson, to send me a few examples of people who produced some of their greatest works in their fifth decade — or beyond — from his own post-40 creative masterpiece, “A Book of Ages.” Here are some of the examples he sent me:
“The most successful artists … aren’t slaves to their chronological age,” writes Lehrer. “Instead, they succeed by speaking to the age in which they live.”
Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.
0 Comments:
Forgot Password? | Register to Comment
MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.
We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.