
MinnPost thanks these major sponsors:
Sponsor of
Second Opinion
Sponsor of
Community Sketchbook
Our major advertisers
Our in-kind partners

MinnPost thanks these generous donors:
INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik
(See all donors here.)
By Susan Perry | Published Fri, Sep 3 2010 8:52 am
In his Frontal Cortex blog at Wired.com, science writer Jonah Lehrer discusses possible reasons for why small towns and cities (fewer than 500,000 people) produce a significantly greater percentage of professional athletes than larger cities.
“While approximately 52 percent of the United States population resides in metropolitan areas with more than 500,000 people, such cities only produce 13% of the players in the NHL, 29% of the players in the NBA, 15% of the players in MLB, and 13% of players in the PGA,” Lehrer writes.
The Canadian psychologists who uncovered those statistics offer one explanation:
These small communities may offer more psychosocially supportive environments that are more intimate. In particular, sport programs in small communities may offer more opportunities for relationship development with coaches, parents, and peers, a greater sense of belonging and a better integration of the program within the community.
But Lehrer, citing University of Chicago psychologist Sian Beilock, whose book “Choke” is soon to be published, suggests an additional possibility:
She proposes that an important advantage of small towns is that they’re actually less competitive, thus allowing kids to sample and explore many different sports. … While conventional wisdom assumes that it’s best to focus on a single sport as soon as possible and to compete in the most rigorous arena — this is the essential lesson of Tiger Woods — Beilock argues that that’s probably a mistake, both for psychological and physical reasons.
Psychologically, the kids risk burnout, Beilock says. And, physically, they risk sports-related injuries that may, ironically, end their athletic career.
“This is a nice addendum to the 10,000 hour rule [the idea that people need to spend about 10,000 hours of practice before they become an expert],” writes Lehrer. “While deliberate practice remains absolutely crucial, it’s important to remember that the most important skills we develop at an early age are not domain specific. (In other words, Tiger Woods is not using the same golf swing he relied on as a 5 year old.) Instead, the real importance of early childhood has to do with the development of general cognitive and non-cognitive traits, such as self-control, patience, grit, and the willingness to practice.”
You can read Lehrer’s entire column here.
Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.
5 Comments: Hide/Show Comments
Forgot Password? | Register to Comment
MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.
We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.