Lobbying the Legislature: Who's spending what?

Campaign finance reports released this week document massive spending in Minnesota’s 2010 races — especially in the governor’s race where the campaign of Mark Dayton spent $5.3 million and Tom Emmer spent $2.8 million.
Underneath all of the election year spending there was also the steady drumbeat of workaday lobbying to influence the actions of Minnesota’s legislators, commissions, public officials, and county and city governments.
Data obtained from the Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board details the efforts of hundreds of organizations to influence many layers of power in the state.
I’ll be drilling into the data here at The Intelligencer, beginning today with an overview of legislative lobbying. All told, lobbying organizations reported spending close to $11 million dollars in 2010.
At nearly $1 million, Minnesota Business Partnership spent more money than any other organization working to influence legislative action, which can include action by committees, subcommittees, resolutions, nominations, appointments, and even gubernatorial response to a bill. The Minnesota Chamber of Commerce comes in a close second at $918,000 with Education Minnesota at a distant third at $700,000.
The data becomes a bit more interesting when organization spending is split up by category. All lobbying reports must include a breakdown of spending by category, such as media advertising, telephone and communications costs, staff salaries, even food and beverages.
Media advertising
|
Organization |
Total reported 2010 | Rank in total spending |
| Education Minnesota | $447,345 | 3 |
|
AARP |
$37,657 | 20 |
| Lignite Energy Council | $26,969 | 54 |
|
National Association of Industrial & Office Properties |
$26,314 | 4 |
|
Minnesota Cable Communications Association |
$19,971 | 96 |
Support staff salary and administrative costs
| Organization | Total reported 2010 | Rank in total spending |
| Education Minnesota | $174,404 | 3 |
| Association of Minnesota Counties | $173,300 | 9 |
| National Association of Industrial & Office Properties | $128,140 | 4 |
| Association of Metropolitan School Districts | $93,153 | 12 |
| Minnesota Business Partnerships | $73,255 | 1 |
Telephone and communications
| Organization | Total reported 2010 | Rank in total spending |
| AARP | $27,427 | 20 |
| Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity | $25,000 | 69 |
| Minnesota Chamber of Commerce | $19,004 | 2 |
| Minnesota Environmental Partnership | $16,449 | 59 |
| AFSCME Council 5 | $8,897 | 19 |
Postage and distribution
| Organization | Total reported 2010 | Rank in total spending |
| Coalition of Minnesota Businesses |
$24,209 | 5 |
| Minnesota Dental Association | $7,418 | 86 |
| Allied Charities of Minnesota | $7,150 | 72 |
| Minnesota Chamber of Commerce | $5,346 | 2 |
| Joint Religious Legislative Coalition | $5,218 | 24 |
Food and beverage
| Organization | Total reported 2010 | Rank in total spending |
| Minnesota Business Partnership | $120,543 | 1 |
| AFSCME Council 5 | $54,732 | 19 |
| Minnesota Nurses Association | $42,334 | 26 |
| Minnesota Association of Realtors | $24,028 | 13 |
| Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities | $16,283 | 6 |
Source: Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board
More like this
- Minnesota Chamber lawsuit seeks clarity, and state conformity, on high court's campaign finance ruling
- Court hearing to revisit Minnesota corporate campaign finance law
- Glum times -- and bad news -- for Best Buy and Supervalu
- Drilling deeper into the Supreme Court's corporate campaign-finance decision
- Franken wants Chamber investigated over election spending
Recent Stories
Most Commented
-
34 comments
-
21 comments
-
17 comments
-
11 comments
-
10 comments
Comments (4)
So... the constant complaint on the part of our Revenant Republican would-be overlords that Education Minnesota was running the state capital in recent years...
Was just a smokescreen for the FACT that the Minnesota Business Partnership and the Chamber of Commerce were actually the ones desperately attempting a (now largely successful) takeover with only Governor Dayton standing in the way of impoverishing the rest of us and de-funding our state's physical, social, health, environmental and educational infrastructures in order to further selfishly and self-servingly pad their already overstuffed pockets.
Of course they'll soon sound just like the cranks in all of our own towns who complain the most loudly and bitterly about the pot holes on their streets while at the same demanding cuts in the very taxes that go to pay for repairing those pot holes.
There is no logic in the desire of these fat cats to damage and destroy all the things that have enabled their businesses to be so successful here in Minnesota, but then again, these are wealthy Revenant Republicans and their sycophants, so money trumps logic each and every time the two come up against each other.
Their solution: STOP TEACHING OUR KIDS LOGIC!
Where are the Anti-gay marriage DVD costs from the Catholic church? Where is the money Target and Best Buy gave to Pawlenty's buddies?
This doesn't seem complete.
Rich (#2)
The Archbishop's DVDs were supplied by an anonymous, wealthy donor, who also paid the postage.
The Target and Best Buy donations went to groups like the Minnesota Business Partnership and Norm Coleman's new nonprofit (I'm not remembering the name at the moment), who then donated it to campaigns without have to tell anyone where the money came from. (Send your thank you letter or a strong complaint to the Supreme Court that made the disastrous Citizens v. United decision.)
Hey Jeff: Good piece, but tell us why you think splitting the spending out by categories is interesting. And, a clarification: your article is about what these groups spent lobbying the 2010 legislature, NOT campaign spending, right? How about a little more information about the groups - National Association of Industrial & Office Properties was No 4 on staff spending in MN - who they?? Looking forward to more!