Skip to Content

Minnesota close to losing a congressional seat after census

Getting an accurate -- and full -- count of Minnesotans in the 2010 U.S. Census will be crucial for maintaining the state's eight congressional districts, a state census official said in Bemidji Tuesday.

Quoted in  the Bemidji Pioneer, Ryan Dolan, Census 2010 campaign coordinator for the State Demographic Center, said: “We predict we’re 1,787 people away from losing the last seat. We have about 1,700 townships in the state, so if we miss one person in every township, we lose a congressional seat. That’s just one person in every small town in our state.”

He spoke at a town hall meeting on the census and said the 7th Congressional District, now held by Rep. Collin Peterson, a DFLer from Detroit Lakes, would see the most pressure, as the 7th stretches from the Canadian border to within 40 miles of the Iowa border. The 8th District, held by Rep. Jim Oberstar, a Democrat from Chisholm, is mostly compact and could extend across northern Minnesota with the loss of a seat.


“This is a significant loss of power to the state of Minnesota. We already know what if feels like to be one senator short. If we’re one House member short, that’s a whole quagmire we’ll be dealing with in redrawing the (apportionment) map.”

Census results also affect distribution of federal dollars to the states, he said.

 “About $300 billion is tied to the Census numbers every single year in federal money to the states. With the new administration, it’s nearly $400 billion.” So for every person missed in Minnesota’s census count, $1,000 to $1,200 per person in lost federal aid, he said.

“If we miss one person in the Census, we lose $10,000 to $12,000 over a 10-year period,” he said.

Related Tags:

Comments (4)

If we do lose one, can we voluntarily choose that it be Bachmann?

Matt,
I believe Bachmannn has volunteered because she doesn't want to fill out the census.

Matt, the subplot, nationwide, is that the 2010 elections will, in most cases, elect the governors and/or legislatures that will do the redistricting based on the 2010 census. So, step 1 is to determine which states lose seats & which gain; step 2 is to adjust borders of various districts to properly apportion the voters among the various districts.

I wonder what the ROI would be if we, as a state, conducted a recruiting campaign to attract residents from faster-growing states: i.e. reduce the chances of, say, TX gaining seats while increasing our chance of holding all of ours.

Gee! To hear Governor Tim and the Republicans tell it, Minnesota is an absolute magnet for folks wanting to move here for our massive welfare benefits, and of course, through their "no new taxes" philosophy, they've established the best business climate in the nation, haven't they?

Where are all these people moving here for the wonderful business climate and the wonderful government benefits? Could it be they don't exist because the facts to back up the welfare magnet and business climate claims also don't exist?

Could it be those claims are political slogans by which they draw in the lazy thinkers, the weak-minded and incurious - you know, the same ones who, as your classmates in high school never wanted to do their homework?