Vikings express disappointment over 'no progress,' say stadium issue must be resolved next year
The Vikings issued a statement this afternoon expressing disappointment with no progress on the new stadium front at the just-completed legislative session.
"This [stadium] solution must be finalized in the 2011 session," the statement read.
Here it is in full:
The Minnesota Vikings want to thank the tens of thousands of Vikings fans for their tremendous support for a new stadium. We appreciate the army of fans who stand with us at this watershed moment for the future of the franchise in Minnesota.
The Vikings organization is extremely disappointed that the Governor and State Legislature did not move the stadium issue forward this year. While we greatly respect the challenges and priorities faced by the State of Minnesota, resolution of this issue has now been pushed to the final year of the lease. This lack of action will only increase the costs of the project for everyone, plus we missed the opportunity to put thousands of Minnesotans back to work.
The Vikings and the NFL have made significant commitments to this market — commitments that cannot be sustained at the Metrodome. In 2006, the Vikings were asked by Governor Pawlenty and State leaders to step back and allow the Twins and Gophers stadium issues to be resolved. Those State leaders committed to work with the team to resolve this issue. More than four years later, those commitments have not been honored.
We appeal to our State’s leaders to join the bi-partisan group of legislators who have stepped up to work on securing the long-term future of the Vikings in Minnesota. This group of leaders has acknowledged that having an NFL team in Minnesota requires a stadium solution. This solution must be finalized in the 2011 Session.
More like this
- Governor says no special session for Vikings stadium
- Urgency fading in Vikings stadium talks, Strib says
- Dome to get new roof; Dayton narrows stadium finance vision
- Vikings stadium: How will Pawlenty's decision affect the future of the state's popular NFL franchise?
- Worthington paper calls session 'ugly and forgettable'
Recent Stories
Most Commented
-
30 comments
-
27 comments
-
27 comments
-
26 comments
-
23 comments
Comments (4)
Why wait until 2011 for resolution? Let's resolve it right now. "No."
I couldn't agree more, Mr. Cantor. The next session will have far more important things to address, given the failure of this session to do more than put duct tape over the holes in the budget.
I've created a Facebook group for those who are tired of listening to the Vikings' complaints: "Won't somebody take the Minnesota Vikings, please? For those tired of saying 'no' to Zygi Wilf's repeated demands for a new stadium built on our dime."
The Vikings sold the HHH Metrodome name to the
Mall of America for "low seven figures" we are
told. Certain gates are up for sale as well. Do they have any idea how stupid it looks to name our Hump after a mall several miles away? Are they going to sell Hubert Humphrey's statue to a
club of pigeon fanciers? The Met Sports Commission
has no shame. This along with the dropping the airport terminal names, I smell the work of too many
Pawlenty appointees.