U of M's Bruininks: Legislative cuts 'make no sense'
University of Minnesota President Robert Bruininks lashed out today against proposed cuts to higher education and the University now being considered by the state Senate:
“It should come as no surprise that I do not support the budget recommendation of the Senate Higher Education Committee. The recommended cut of $243 million or 18.9% is a deeper cut than the one recommended by the House last week and significantly deeper then the recommendation of the Governor despite a 13:1 return on the state’s investment in the U and a statewide economic impact estimated — conservatively — at $8.6 billion per year. This makes no sense.
“In addition, the proposed cut rolls our state support back to levels not seen since before 1998. Think about that: this fall’s incoming freshmen were just starting kindergarten the last time state funding was at the level proposed today. Ask yourselves, what will this mean for the children of today? Thirteen years from now, will our best and brightest apply in record numbers to the U? Or will they see a once-great university in shambles and look elsewhere?
“Make no mistake: We know we have a role to play in helping Minnesota balance its budget, and we will continue to do our part — both in terms of significantly reducing costs and spending, and generating the external support, outstanding graduates, and breakthrough discoveries that fuel our economy. But cuts of this magnitude in the Senate bill will devastate our ability to deliver on our mission, which serves the needs of every region of Minnesota. This is a backward budget proposal that penalizes productivity and denies a decade of unprecedented performance. As I indicated last week, if the legislature chooses to solve a decade’s worth of state financial mismanagement by pulling the rug out from under the University of Minnesota, the damage will be statewide and permanent.
“I am also concerned about the anti-research provisions of this bill. We are the place that has pioneered the treatments and cures that have improved the lives of families in Minnesota and around the world. Regulation that limits the ability of the University to achieve scientific advances to prevent and cure disease will seriously erode the economic competitiveness of the University and the state.”
Bruininks is stepping down from the presidency this summer, after nearly nine years in the position.
More like this
- U of M makes compelling return-on-investment case; question is, will it help at the Capitol?
- Students, pols rally to reduce proposed 'U' budget cuts
- Faced with state budget cuts, U releases study showing $8 billion annual impact
- Dayton hears from educators about higher-ed cuts
- U President Bruininks makes opening legislative pitch to preserve funding and limit budget cuts
Recent Stories
Most Commented
-
27 comments
-
22 comments
-
19 comments
-
18 comments
-
15 comments
Comments (1)
Hopefully, this sorry performance by the U of M president will not be repeated again by the next one.
To argue that we should get money from the legislature "because we're worth it" and to use the so-called unbiased services of Tripp Umbach to prove it is yet another example of poor strategy that has been characteristic of this administration. Tripp Umbach has gotten how much money from the U of M over the years? And based on the performance at the last Board of Regents meeting they will be only too happy to help us in the future, presumably not gratis.
For an illustration of some work TU has done in the past please see:
http://ptable.blogspot.com/2011/03/little-biotech-company-that-wasnt.html
What might have worked better is some real cuts in administration and a transparent explanation of how much it costs to educate an undergraduate for one year at the U of M. The cost of research - not covered by outside grants - should also be revealed as should the source of funds that make up this deficit.
Wait 'til next year...