Skip to Content

Support MinnPost

MinnPost logo 7th Anniversary

MinnPost’s online auction is now live!
Register and start bidding today

Minnesota Council of Churches launches campaign against voting amendment

Bishop Peter Rogness of the St. Paul Synod of the Evangelical Lutheran Church
MinnPost photo by James Nord
Bishop Peter Rogness of the St. Paul Synod of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America outlines why a group of churches representing 1 million Christians opposes the voting amendment.

In the final weeks before Election Day, a coalition of churches representing about 1 million Minnesota Christians has jumped into the fight against the proposed voting amendment, citing many of the same concerns opponents have been campaigning on for months.

The Minnesota Council of Churches announced Tuesday that it would be working to block the amendment, which would require voters to present a photo ID at the polls and could drastically alter the state’s current election system.

The group is concerned about the measure’s potential effects on those on the fringes of society, such as the poor, disabled and elderly.

“If there ever was a reason to vote, the time is now. Vote to save the right to vote,” the Rev. Peg Chemberlin, executive director of the MCC, said at a press conference outside of Central Lutheran Church in downtown Minneapolis.

“The Voter ID amendment seems innocuous enough, but when we start to unwrap all that it means, we begin to see the threat this could pose to the right to vote for tens of thousands.”

The MCC joins another multi-faith coalition of religious groups that announced an opposition campaign last month. Although polling has improved for opponents of the amendment since then, it’s still an uphill battle to Nov. 6.

Chemberlin said members of the churches would be directed to the official anti-amendment campaign, Our Vote Our Future, although the MCC is not an official partner.

She also said the group would employ direct mailings and encourage conversations within churches to oppose the amendment. Chemberlin downplayed the potential discord that taking an official position against the ballot question could cause, and said she’s excited for “vigorous debate.”

Bishop Peter Rogness, president of the MCC, also stressed the churches' near-unanimous support for working against the amendment.

 “There is a fundamental value issue in play that led us to stand up even though we know there is a variety of opinions …  around the state.”

The MCC represents the following denominations: African Methodist Episcopal Church, American Baptist Churches USA, Christian Church (Disciples of Christ), Church of God in Christ, Church of the Brethren, The Episcopal Church, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America, Mennonite Church, Moravian Church, National Association of Congregational Christian Churches, National Baptist Convention, Presbyterian Church (USA), United Church of Christ, United Methodist Church. 

Get MinnPost's top stories in your inbox

Related Tags:

About the Author:

Comments (1)

Probably only a few readers realize that this group of

churches is a bleating "radical left group."

A bunch of real lefties: ELCA, AME, Episcopalians, Methodists, Presbyterians... Why even those left wingers in the Greek Orthodox Church have signed on with this radical left group.

But Mitch P. Berg, our erstwhile right wing blogger, tweeter, and squawk radio host knows this group is radical left. Recall that Mr. Berg is one of the go to guys for right wing comments on MinnPost.

He tweeted earlier today:

"Fixed! "@GretaABergstrom MN Council of Churches, radical left group largely concealed from church members, bleats about #VoterID" #stribpol"

In this case "Fixed" means mutated the tweet 180 degrees away from the original author's intent.

Sad that the right resorts to such low tactics in pushing an amendment that will effectively disenfranchise too many citizens.

And sad that the right will dismiss church men and women as radical lefties when the opinion of these people of conscience differs from their own.