- Home
- MN/Region
- World/Nation
- Politics
- Health/Science
- Business
- Arts
- Posts
- Sports
- Community Voices
- MN Jobs

MinnPost thanks these major sponsors:
Sponsor of
Second Opinion
Sponsor of
Community Voices
Sponsor of
Community Sketchbook

MinnPost thanks these generous donors of $25,000 or more:
MAJOR FOUNDATIONS
John S. and James L.
Knight Foundation
Blandin Foundation
McKnight Foundation
Minneapolis Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
INDIVIDUALS & FAMILY FOUNDATIONS
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Sam & Stacey Heins
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown
Foundation
(See all donors here.)
By Joe Kimball | Published Fri, Dec 19 2008 2:42 pm
Light rail planners now say the old Gillette plant in St. Paul's Lowertown is the best choice for a Central Corridor train maintenance facility.
Previously, officials had planned to build a new facility on county-owned land on the eastern edge of downtown, between Kellogg Boulevard and Warner Road.
But the empty 178,000-square-foot plant -- most recently used by Diamond Products -- would be better for many reasons, including lower costs to prepare and to operate.
Planners say it would cost about $72 million to build on the county site and connect it to the light rail tracks. Cost to buy and remodel the Gillette/Diamond building is about $69 million.
In other light rail news, Minnesota Public Radio President Bill Kling said flatly this week: "Either the line moves — or we move." He spoke with the Pioneer Press after MinnPost reported Tuesday that MPR might sue to have the proposed light rail route moved from the street in front of its headquarters building in downtown St. Paul.
The newspaper says the current route represents a long-sought consensus and is the best chance to get the project built.
Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.
3 Comments: Hide/Show Comments
Forgot Password? | Register to Comment
MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.
We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.