
Our major sponsors
Sponsor of
Second Opinion
Sponsor of
Community Sketchbook
Our major advertisers
Our in-kind partners

MinnPost thanks these generous donors:
INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik
(See all donors here.)
By Jay Weiner | Published Wed, Dec 24 2008 11:25 am
Never one to take a day off, the Minnesota Supreme Court this morning issued an order formalizing the process to open the 1,600 or so improperly rejected absentee ballots yet to be counted in the Coleman-Franken recount.
The order follows a recommendation made to the justices yesterday by Secretary of State Mark Ritchie and the campaigns.
Key elements: Votes must be counted by Jan. 4, and the privacy of the voters will be maintained because the ballots will be opened as a group in St. Paul, not in each precinct.
The tricky issue: Via Data Practices Act requests, campaigns and others know which voters' ballots may have been rejected. If, in a small precinct, one absentee ballot was improperly rejected, it's possible to know whose ballot that is.
By aggregating all the improperly rejected ballots in St. Paul, votes can't be traced to specific counties and, so, voters.
Privacy is preserved.
For the full order (PDF), go to the Supreme Court's recount web site and scroll to the middle of the page, click on "Order 12-24-08."
That page has all the recount documents filed with the court, which could make for some time-consuming holiday reading.
Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.
0 Comments:
Forgot Password? | Register to Comment
MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.
We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.