SERVING MINNEAPOLIS / ST. PAUL / MINNESOTA
Donate Now Sustaining Member


Our major sponsors




Sponsor of
Second Opinion



Our major advertisers


Our in-kind partners


MinnPost thanks these generous donors:

INDIVIDUALS AND FOUNDATI0NS
Blandin Foundation
Otto Bremer Foundation
Bush Foundation
Sage & John Cowles
David & Vicki Cox
Toby & Mae Dayton
Jack & Claire Dempsey
Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation
Sam & Stacey Heins
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Joel & Laurie Kramer
Lee Lynch & Terry Saario
Martin & Brown Foundation
The McKnight Foundation
The Minneapolis Foundation
The Saint Paul Foundation
Rebecca & Mark Shavlik

(See all donors here.)

POLITICAL AGENDA

  • Switch to Small Text Size
  • Switch to Medium Text Size
  • Switch to Large Text Size
Email Print Submit a Comment

    Supreme Court responds to Coleman's recount request

    By Eric Black | Published Fri, Jan 2 2009 2:39 pm

    Early this afternoon, the Minnesota Supreme Court made its first response to Norm Coleman’s request that it revise the last stage of the recount procedure. The court order gives little clue about how the Supremes will treat Coleman’s request. The justices asked only that the Al Franken campaign, and several counties that were mentioned in Coleman’s Wednesday petition, file with the court a description of how they dealt with Coleman’s efforts to have 654 additional absentee ballots reconsidered.

    They asked for those submission by 9 a.m. tomorrow. Saturday is also a day when the secretary of state’s office will be opening and counting absentee ballots that the counties decided (with the agreement of both campaigns) had been wrongfully rejected on Election Night.

    The Supreme Court instructed the parties to await notice of whether the court might want to hold a hearing and hear arguments on Coleman’s petition. Coleman, who had no luck getting additional absentee ballots considered on the last round, had asked that potentially valid absentee ballots be sent to the secretary of state’s office, so their potential acceptance for counting can be handled in a uniform manner.

    Today’s court order doesn’t change the state of play much, but raises the possibility that the court will hold a hearing and make a ruling on Coleman’s petition.

    Secretary of State Mark Ritchie put out a statement indicating he would file the requested information with the court, and reaffirming that his office is on track to complete the counting of wrongly rejected absentee ballots on Sunday.

    If the court doesn’t order a change in the process, it is possible that the state Canvassing Board will complete the recount on Monday.

     

    Like what you just read? Support high-quality journalism in Minnesota by becoming a member of MinnPost.

    Advertisement:

    2 Comments: Hide/Show Comments

    E-mail address

    Password

     

    Forgot Password? | Register to Comment

    MinnPost does not permit the use of foul language, personal attacks or the use of language that may be libelous or interpreted as inciting hate or sexual harassment. User comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure that comments meet these standards and adhere to MinnPost's terms of use and privacy policy.

    We intend for this area to be used by our readers as a place for civil, thought-provoking and high-quality public discussion. In order to achieve this, MinnPost requires that all commenters register and post comments with their actual names and place of residence. Register here to comment.




    minnpost.com/politicalagenda



    Political Agenda is a place for quick-hit news about Minnesota's political scene and players. MinnPost's staff, including Joe Kimball and Doug Grow, will contribute items about local and state government, plus national political doings that have a Minnesota angle. Items will appear throughout the day, so check back often.

    MinnPost Topic Pages



    Recent Political Agenda Posts